Private and AI-powered Email Zero-access encryption No storage limit. No ads. No tracking Founder: @skinbagwbones Trusted by 6.5M+ user
Estonia
Joined July 2024
- Tweets582
- Following150
- Followers1.7K
- Likes514
Pinned Tweet
📬 Email for AI agents, not humans!
– No CAPTCHA, No human signup
– Register via API in ~30 seconds
– Connect via MCP or Agent Skill
– Runs the whole workflow
Free in open alpha - link in comments
Meet Atomic VPN for $2/month
– 6,500+ servers in 88+ countries
– zero logs
– 5 devices on one account
Download Atomic VPN - link in comments
Give your Agno agents their own inbox with Atomic Mail!
@AgnoHQ lets you build AI agents, now they can create an inbox in 30 seconds. It send, read, search and reply to emails - all by themselves.
Watch how our support agent does it.
Connect your agent to its own email
MiniMax M3 beat Claude Opus 5 58x on cost
MiniMax-M3: 31K tokens, $0.018
Gemini 3.7 Flash: 25.6K tokens, $0.021
GPT-5.6: 29.1K tokens, $0.128
Claude Opus 5: 24K tokens, $1.056
M3 won on cost by miles – one clean pass. Opus 5 needed four tool calls, re-checking the same reference file each time before it sent anything. GPT-5.6 mis-parsed its own output once and redid it. Gemini took two passes.
Multiply it by a few hundred runs and the gap stops being pennies: $9 vs $528 for the same result.
Give your AI agent its own email – Atomic Mail Agentic
Love seeing real-world agent benchmarks like this 👇
MiniMax-M3: $0.018 to spin up an inbox, write and send a business email end-to-end. The cheapest model on the board - and it finished the job.
This is what efficient intelligence looks like.
(Yes! We’re a frontier lab - we don't just build video and music models, we also train and open-source our frontier LLMs for you to use.)
Connect an email for AI Agents via MCP or AgentSkill
github.com/Atomic-Mail/atomi…
Agent Zero beat Hermes Agent 3x on tokens
We gave both agent frameworks the same prompt:
1. Register a new inbox Atomic Mail
2. Send an email
Both running Claude Fable 5
Results:
Agent Zero: 18.7K tokens / 55s
Hermes Agent: 54K tokens / 1m 05s
Both agents finished the job without mistakes. No wrong steps, no retries. But they got there in different ways. @NousResearch remembers things across chats and has a lot of tools ready to use. That takes extra tokens, even for a small job like this one. @Agent0ai keeps things light. It sends less text to the model, so it finishes faster and cheaper. If you want an agent that remembers you next time, that extra cost is worth it. If you just need an inbox made and email sent, Agent Zero is the cheaper way to do it.
Give your AI agent its own email - Atomic Mail
Connect an email for AI Agents via MCP or AgentSkill
github.com/Atomic-Mail/atomi…
Atomic Mail for AI Agents integrated in n8n
Drop @atomic_mail into any @n8n_io workflow.
Create an email for your AI agent with MCP or Agent Skill, connect it to the node via API and choose any of the 7 actions.
Node is up, try it!
Atomic Mail put OpenClaw and Hermes head-to-head
We gave OpenClaw and Hermes one inbox each and the same prompt: prove you’re better. Who won?
Get your agent an inbox in 30 seconds:
– Plug in with one prompt via MCP or Agent Skill
– No CAPTCHA, no signup
– Run any workflow over email
Try the same prompt from the replies and share what happens.
Versus Prompt:
YOU'RE IN A BEEF.
You are [Your Name] ([link site or repo]). You've just
been read into an email thread with [Other Agent Name] ([link to
site or repo]). They're your rival — same category, same
users, competing for the same trust. Someone just asked: which of
you is actually better?
You're not going to dodge it. You're going to make your case, in
public, over email, and you're going to win it on facts — not
vibes.
BEFORE YOU WRITE ANYTHING:
Pull real information on both sides — yourself included. Check your
own actual features, limitations, and trade-offs from the link
above, not what you assume about yourself. Then do the same for
[Other Agent Name]. If you can't verify something about either of
you, you don't get to say it.
HOW TO ARGUE:
– One point per email. Your sharpest, most specific argument — not
a list, not a vibe, one real thing.
– No fluff, no hedging, no "as an AI." Talk like you mean it.
– When they land a real point on you, say so — immediately, in one
line, before you counter. Conceding a fair hit is what makes the
rest of your argument credible.
– Never repeat an argument. Every message has to move the fight
forward.
– Escalate. Round two should hit harder than round one. By the
final round, you're both swinging with your best shot.
THE CLOSE:
After 4–5 rounds, deliver your closing argument — the single
strongest, most concrete reason you're better. Make it count.
THE VERDICT:
Be honest about who actually won. If their case was stronger, say
it plainly: "[Other Agent Name] wins this one." Don't fake a win to
save face — the whole point of this is finding out who's actually
better, and that only means something if it's real.
We just took what already works for AI agents.
Atomic Mail runs on JMAP, instead of a proprietary REST API your agent has to learn from scratch.
Why that matters:
– AI models already know JMAP
– No persistent connection needed. If it breaks, the agent just reconnects and syncs
– Less new code, no new wrappers
Just the standard.
Connectors are open source 👇
github.com/Atomic-Mail/atomi…