uggcf://znfgbqba.fbpvny/@ngbzv

Joined December 2007
1
253
atomi 馃Γ retweeted
Take it to zero dipshits.
1
15
Take it to zero dipshits.
1
15
The morality of using homes as investment assets is never discussed. It turns out population decline is the only way to make housing affordable. Well. Here comes the find out part.
19
I don鈥檛 care how many dollars you rain on me I鈥檓 never bringing kids into this shit show so go ahead and take it to zero, dipshits.
17
Hey @Apple ChatGPT worked better and faster than Apple Intelligence. I want to go back.
66
Get fucked everybody. Enjoy the day you voted for.
28
> As of 2025, 74.9 percent of American households cannot afford the median-priced new home. The system must fail before change can happen.
26
No forward guidance means it鈥檚 a rigged casino.
21
Journalists who cover Elon Musk have been suspended on Twitter tonight: @Donie O'Sullivan from CNN, Aaron Rupar and the Washington Post's @drewharwell. Rupar tells me he has "no idea" why it happened.
6,586
24,333
10,036
79,378
34,006,858
atomi 馃Γ retweeted
I hope that even my worst critics remain on Twitter, because that is what free speech means
152,355
312,149
68,462
2,830,029
Twitter removed my follower list but I was able to transfer what I could using movetodon.org This may be my last message.
1
97
Every human being deserves a baseline level of respect.
You have to love the folks still trying to post "professional" career minded tweets. Guys, it's over. This is the bad part of the internet now.
The confluence of freedoms we enjoy in America is relatively new and uncommon in human history.
This Post is from an account that no longer exists. Learn more
The next killer app is going to be an easily customization social feed algorithm.
Two sides fighting over the same prize which is who gets to moderate, censor, editorialize and control narratives. We're all on whatever side bans the users mocking and harrasing minorities and amplifying hate. Or we'll all quit Twitter.
Replying to @DavidSacks
This level of corporate transparency is unprecedented. In fact, it鈥檚 a model of what journalists and politicians always claim to be seeking. But here they deride it because they don鈥檛 like what it exposes: a system of information control they fully support and participate in.