Can’t wait for Kaiser to get sued for similar stuff. Fck wholesale medicinal care
Ughhhh they had a clinic PA seeing over 20 patients a day and this led to provider missing ACS (acute coronary syndrome) in a 53 year old male patient (who happened to be an exec at Ernst & Young). Patient was evaluated twice for chest pain … and both times the PA appears to have misdiagnosed him with something benign.
Now you know why @bgurley loves OSS.
The TSO, or Technology Support Office, was established in April to 'covertly disrupt and sabotage foreign technology programs considered threats to American military superiority.'
In September the Washington Sun reported that the NSA told lawmakers in classified intelligence briefings that it estimates it has spent billions of dollars 'evaluating and testing' models this year already.
In the draft S-1 leaked by the WSJ yesterday, Anthropic said that one-fifth of its $16.3 billion in revenue in the first half of 2026 came from just two customers.
Motive, means, and opportunity. I think a lot of money is being spent by agencies through Project Glasswing or channels related to it, and they have probably covertly penetrated every nation on earth to look at anything even potentially considered a threat. There is no defense against the current internal version of Mythos unless you have access to it. No foreign intelligence agency on earth has anything even close. It's actions would also almost certainly be undetectable. Assume US agencies know much more about any technological progress in China than they are letting on; given Dario's openly stated position on China, this would almost certainly be done with his approval.
That’s a cute way to spin it $CBRS.
Cerebras CEO Andrew Feldman reveals OpenAI went with Nvidia for its next generation because its first Cerebras deployment was so successful OpenAI wanted to go vastly wider, and Cerebras just didn’t have the capacity
“First, somebody like Sam and Greg, at their level of wealth in 2013, ‘14, ‘15, ‘16, they’re making hundreds and hundreds of angel investments, and they’re doing it at modest amounts, right?"
"So I don’t think their position in us moves the dial at all. They did it early, too, in Series A, when the world was different. That’s the first thing."
"The second thing is that we won and began deploying GPT-5.6 Sol, and we did that at 750, 800 tokens per second."
"There was so much success there that one of the things OpenAI wanted to do was, with the next generation, go vastly wider. And we just didn’t have the capacity for them."
"We didn’t have the data centers, and that goes back to your first point. Our deal with them is we put up data centers for them and then put our compute in it and then sell them tokens. And we just didn’t have the capacity.”
The ticker is the least of their problems $CBRS
Let there be peace.
@insane_analyst I prefer you and @dylan522p on the same side of bashing $CBRS.
How should I think about $AMD and $CBRS going fwd. dead man walking.
Outsourcing thinking to AI is how we make real alpha.
The best part about this entire episode is that lady is probably worth high eight figures. Which goes to show morons win.
After the failed "dots" demo a few days ago, the same lady recorded a NINE MINUTE(!) video trying to prove she could book a flight with dots, and then never even booked it!
fwiw, finding and booking flights is already so beautifully optimized online that this isn't a relevant use case - it's already easy and fast.
It will BECOME RELEVANT when Microsoft and Google - who have access to your email, video meetings, calendar, passwords, rewards info, payment info, travel history, etc. - observe that you just agreed to a meeting in another city and, without you even asking, have their agents ask you if you want flights and hotel, propose windows for travel, show you options based on your demonstrated preferences, and then go do it without you having to guide it.
OpenAI has not earned - and is unlikely to earn - the right to do that for most people, much less for most businesses.
“Could” every successful stock pitch’s overused word.
$CBRS
Cerebras could power more advanced models, and there’s a strong chance it will be used for fast version of Astra.
Their cloud capacity is still very limited and insufficient to meet the enormous demand. That makes it plausible that Cerebras will be used to power more expensive, higher-end models.
Let’s keep a close eye on this.
If you replace “AI” or model with “OS” you would see why $MSFT is pushing this. They never thought this was a issue when pushing Windows apparently
Any pursuit of superintelligence has to be grounded in the core principle that if the AI we build is not helping humanity and under human control, it's not worth pursuing.
We also need to accelerate and spread the benefits of AI, such that they are diffused broadly across countries, communities, and companies. This requires a frontier ecosystem in which both closed and open-source models can thrive.
And for firms, it’s imperative that they retain full control over their unique and tacit knowledge. Every organization should be able to build its own continuous learning loop/hill climbing machine, without becoming dependent on any one model provider, and have the ability to embed its own knowledge into models and weights they control.
So, in this context, we welcome the research, focus, and deliberate pacing needed to get alignment right as the design goal. We also welcome ideas like "embedded evaluators" and the broader efforts to develop the mechanisms to make this more than just talk.
The key is that this cannot be controlled by a handful of entities, but must have broad representation across the ecosystem, countries, and fields, including academia.
This is the approach we are taking: broad access and choice at every layer of the AI stack; enterprise control of learning loops and models; and the “Code of Conduct” that underlies our own first party MAI models that we’ll publish tomorrow for public consultation.




















