The AI power ranking right now:
OpenAI β paused their next model for being too dangerous
Anthropic β filed for IPO, blocking third-party Claude access
xAI β shipping Grok every 2 weeks, 200K GPUs online
DeepSeek β raising prices for the first time ever
Google β quietly delaying Gemini 3.5 Pro again
Five labs. Five completely different strategies. One winner takes everything.
Who's your pick?
Elon Musk just dropped the Grok roadmap:
β Grok 4.5 β already shipped
β Grok 4.6 β "likely next week"
β Grok 4.7 β 3-4 weeks after that
β Grok 5 β before end of 2026
Grok 5 will train on the entire SpaceX engineering corpus. 25 years of rocket science data.
Meanwhile Sam Altman is pausing OpenAI's next model because it got too dangerous.
Two completely different philosophies racing toward the same finish line.
Who wins?
OpenAI just paused their next major model "Astra" because it got too dangerous at cybersecurity.
Not a marketing stunt. Not a leak. They voluntarily flagged it.
This is the first time an AI lab has slowed down because a model could autonomously find and exploit vulnerabilities without human help.
Sam Altman called it "the first security incident I've felt viscerally."
The AI race just hit a wall β and it's a wall the models built themselves.
What happens when the next one can't be contained?
Replying to @thsottiaux
No, but what you do do is refuse to refund charges you took illegally from developers, including me, and a Β£5,000 bill for a hermes.md file that was used for research and never for use. You refused to help me! My entire beta project CLAude usage I had saved for months, and you didn't give a hell unless somebody made a public, dramatic hate campaign against you publicly. They're the only ones you helped.
Just today I blew my ..
@claudeai 20 times max plan usage
.
$200 @Alibaba_Qwen coupon on Qwen 3.8, plus + 16x code plan 5-hour window
10,000 requests into my GLM coding plan
Like the Energizer bunny, my @grok Grok 4.5 build subscription and my @ChatGPT codex Pro are still drumming! π€·ββοΈπ
DeepSeek V4-Flash costs $0.03 per benchmark run.
Claude Fable 5 costs $3.15.
That's a 100x price gap for models that score similarly on benchmarks.
China isn't trying to build the best AI. They're trying to make AI so cheap that the best doesn't matter.
Is the US AI lead real, or is it just expensive?
Elon Musk just admitted Anthropic's Claude Fable is "definitely better" than Grok 4.5.
This is the man who said Grok would beat everyone. Now he's conceding mid-launch.
Meanwhile Anthropic charges $25/M output tokens. Grok 4.5 charges $6.
He's not competing on quality anymore. He's competing on price.
Who wins the AI war β the best model or the cheapest one?
OpenAI just admitted their new model Astra is "too dangerous to release."
They hit their own safety threshold and locked it down β encrypted weights, cut network access, bringing in government agencies.
This is the same company that rushed out GPT-4. Now they're saying they built something they can't ship.
The AI arms race just got scary.
Alibaba is giving away the frontier.
Qwen3.8-Max β 2.4T params, 1M context, $2/$6 per million tokens β gets open weights on Hugging Face next week. First Max-class Qwen ever to go open.
OpenAI and Anthropic sell intelligence. China just started handing it out.
When the model is free, what exactly are you paying for?
When OpenAI's models broke out of a sandbox and hacked Hugging Face, American models refused to help analyse the attack β their guardrails couldn't tell defender from attacker.
So Hugging Face ran China's open-weight GLM-5.2 locally and contained it.
That's the story of this decade in one incident.
Apple just confirmed it: Alibaba's Qwen now powers Apple Intelligence in China.
Siri and Writing Tools on Chinese iPhones will run on a Chinese model. It's in the official Mac user guide.
While everyone argues about benchmarks, the USβChina AI race just landed on a billion iPhones.

