Making ML Make Sense @ https://xitter.cf/t.co/mD4mMifuVg 👾

Philadelphia, PA
Joined November 2021
Looking to go beyond basic LLM experiments and build real, production-grade applications? We have two free virtual courses designed for AI engineers of all levels who want to master RAG and LLM evaluations. Here’s what you’ll learn 🧵
2
8
60
30,847
🏆🏆🏆🏆 Four papers at COLM were awarded outstanding paper awards. Congratulations to the authors!
1
39
11
260
91,878
The new @wandb RAG++ course uses the v2 API and the new command-r models. In addition to learning about nuanced RAG techniques, you also get to work with the new API in the course colabs thanks to the credits from @cohere. Register here: wandb.me/rag
We’ve released updated versions of our APIs! This upgrade aims to improve the developer experience, making it easier and faster for developers to build with Cohere. cohere.com/blog/new-api-v2
1
6
1
16
2,660
📣 I am happy to announce that @wandb Weave is now integrated with Instructor (@jxnlco)! 🧶 Weave will automatically capture traces for Instructor. To start tracking, call `weave.init()` and use the library as normal. 👉 Learn more at weave-docs.wandb.ai/guides/i…
1
8
20
2,979
Announcing our new RAG++ course, now available in collaboration with @CohereAI and @Weaviate_io. Created for engineers looking to build production-ready RAG systems. The course covers everything from evaluation strategies and data preprocessing to advanced retrieval techniques and prompt optimization and includes hands-on exercises with code notebooks and Cohere credits. Register here: wandb.courses/courses/rag-in…
1
25
8
92
17,550
Defining your grading criteria for LLM outputs is an organic process that evolves the more time you spend on it In “Who Validates the Validators” @sh_reya et al highlight this This weekend in our SF office a good chunk % of hackers will learn this 😃 lu.ma/judge
This. This is the hardest problem in using LLMs beyond any benchmarks
4
8
3,149
Today I gave @llama_index's workflows a go to tackle the NeurIPS AI hackercup competition. I created a Workflow to iterate from an initial solution, run the generated solution, and check against the expected output. It is effortless to define steps with the expected inputs and outputs. Define your Events and their attributes, and the workflow will be triggered in order when you hit run. I love how the @wandb Weave + step decorators play nice together. Try on colab: colab.research.google.com/gi… Thanks to @LoganMarkewich for all the help! #hackercupai
4
6
2
24
13,720
I've been evaluating chunking mechanisms while prepping our RAG course's data ingestion lesson. Structured, semantic, and syntactic chunking each uniquely impact RAG performance. Learn to choose the right approach for your use case: wandb.me/rag-course
4
8
1,213
⚡️ AI Hacker Cup Lightning Comp Today we're kicking off a ⚡️ 7-day competition to solve all 5 of the 2023 practice Hacker Cup challenges with @MistralAI models Our current baseline is 2/5 with the starter RAG agent (with reflection) @MistralAI api access provided Details👇
2
12
5
37
18,580
Join us on September 10 to learn how to build production-ready RAG systems. Learn from @ash0ts about optimizing pipelines, enhancing queries, and scaling solutions for real-world applications. Ideal for tech leads and product managers driving AI innovation. Register now: wandb.ai/site/resources/even…
1
1
8
1,100
Join me tomorrow. I'm presentimg a codegen agent featuring RAG-based episodic memory and reflexion. Whether you're aiming to enhance your LLM toolkit or just curious about the latest techniques, this talk will deliver essential insights. 🔗events.bizzabo.com/NeurIPSha…
7
3
10
2,632
Stoked to partner with the team to host 7 lectures, a lot of agents creativity needed 📺 wandb.me/hackercup NeurIPS Meta Hacker Cup AI track gonna be 🔥
We've kicked off the NeurIPS Meta Hacker Cup AI track! I mostly use LLMs to code and they've been great at removing the drudgery of boiler-platy code but for harder problems they are meh Both the big-boi llamas and GPT-4 fall flat on their face!
1
4
1
10
3,563
Had a super insightful webinar with @GroqInc on debugging AI-generated code! Their inference speed with Llama 3.1 is mind-blowing, making trial and error so much smoother. youtube.com/watch?v=B70jJYPV…
2
5
1
18
4,990
Key takeaways from the @GroqInc webinar: Iteration is key: Groq's speed lets you experiment with prompts super quickly! Sandbox your code: Use @e2b_dev 's secure environments to test without risking production systems. 🧪 Track everything with @wandb Weave = figure out what works best and why. 📊
1
4
8
2,477
Bonus tips for avoiding AI code hallucinations: Curate your datasets carefully! Garbage in, garbage out. 🗑️ Watch out for those pesky imports in the outputs! Don't forget unit testing & code reviews in your prompting! ✅
1
94
I will be talking tomorrow on- - LLM landscape - Need for structured output - function calling, json, constrained decoding, more - RAG - LLM system evaluation - @wandb Weave for building LLM applications correctly If it excites you, consider showing up. 💫⭐🌟
Will be speaking on 9th, Aug at the @AnalyticsVidhya's Data Hack Summit 24. More details here: analyticsvidhya.com/datahack…
1
4
1
18
2,237
Hallucinations in AI-assisted coding are a significant challenge for developers. Join Daniel Loman from @GroqInc and @ash0ts from Weights & Biases as they share strategies to overcome this issue in our technical webinar on August 6. Register now: streamyard.com/watch/hikcAge…
4
10
3,380
Evaluated Llama 3.1 70B (@FireworksAI_HQ) as well and is performant at the same level as Mistral Large 2 128B. - Llama is outperforming on GSM8k (math) while Mistral is outperforming on MATH benchmark.😅 - Llama > Mistral (reasoning tasks) - Mistral > Llama (Q&A tasks)
I am excited to share some evaluation results done on the MixEval hard benchmark. It was done to see the performance of the two newly launched models - @AIatMeta's Llama 3 405b and @MistralAI's Mistral Large 2. Check out the results below! 👇
1
5
9
1,096
Ran Chain of Density over the full 90 page Llama 3 paper. The user instruction was probably asking for too many things given the available output length. Any other questions I should ask to the paper? Check out the Chain of Density process breakdown at: wandb.ai/wandb_fc/arxiv-read…
2
2
5
984
Check out the tool I use here called Weave @ wandb.me/weave
39