We have a judgment in Reese v. ATF, one of our two cases challenging the federal ban on FFL's selling handguns to adults under 21. SAF won this case at the Fifth Circuit, with the court finding that the ban violated the Second Amendment, and remanded the case back to the District Court for entry of a judgment to that effect. In the District Court a dispute arose between SAF and the Government as to the scope of the injunction: I.e. who was covered. SAF's position is that all SAF members are covered by the injunction, as the case was brought on behalf of all members. The Government took a much narrower approach, Regrettably the court appears to have adopted the Government's position in total. As a result, the injunction in the case (in the context of SAF members specifically) only covers SAF members who were members at the time the case was filed on November 6, 2020, and who are located in the geographical bounds of the Fifth Circuit (Texas, Mississippi and Louisiana). To make matters worse, the court has also required that the membership organizational plaintiffs provide full lists of all affected members within 21 days. To be clear: SAF will not be turning over any lists of membership information to the government. We are frustrated that this judgment acknowledges that the challenged law is unconstitutional, while preventing its enforcement against essentially no one. SAF and our partners are considering all of our legal options and will have updates forthcoming.