I will not sell until the White House press secretary is asked to comment on this coin

Yo any airdrop opportunities on sei? What types of protocols should one take a look at

Forgot to include @lavanetxyz

Blockchain accelerationism

DeInfo? @DegenerateKong @sdrive_app @GenesysGo

bc this is hidden in my "replies", quoting here to invite more community discussion xitter.cf/apecortex/status/16581…

does that answer your question/make sense? @Restuta

Whereas scammers hold call option of spending >= cost(V_ń) if/when +EV looks positive. i.e. $BONK devs can commit $10k to grind addr "bonkReal..." $BONK FDV grows to 100M => scammers incentivized to also spend $10k+ "bonkReal...", rendering initial vanity endeavor worthless

i thought we were talking abt token address, i haven't considered metadata maybe there's something to be had there

With that being said, the topic you want to address/solve @Restuta is important. I’ll sit on it and try to add some ideas instead of just being negative lol

Im also out and abt rn, sent this from my phone 5 min after seeing this. Lmk if that makes sense, or if I’m hallucinating, or missing something

2) cont’d Assume cost Č of some unit of compute. Cost of vanity address length Ń (V_ń) looks something like cost(V_ń) = Č * 58^Ń Prior to launch, team spends some amt X for some length prefix If token successful, more economically viable to spend amt Z > X Scammers win

My thoughts: 1) This is already a thing, rent a NVIDIA gpu, install solana cli tools and run the `grind` command (pictured). Is your suggestion to have the compute-rental organized/executed on chain? 2) IMO this wouldn’t work, bc economic incentives are actually reversed…

neeeeeeed

SHDW Drive will be an IV for GPT-5 few

naive take imo i assume u don't write code?

computation* oops

make sense? @spacemandev

i think you missed my point. I am saying USDC gud - CCTP gud (on solana, eth, whatever circle supports) wormholeUSDC bad if i make a token wrapper for USDC and partner with marginfi to hold their collateral, CCTP wont cover my contract's liabilities

i think the question implies some form of wormhole-wrapped USDC, which holds more risk than Circle's native SPL (or ERC20) USDC