$BBBYQ 🦋

PLANET OF THE APES
Joined November 2022
Liquidity retweeted
Next year, I will give one of my SpaceX shares to every kid in America. This will be the first of many.
45,497
63,788
14,666
624,628
36,195,398
Liquidity retweeted
250
252
83
1,711
163,149
Liquidity retweeted
So we have Elon Musk referencing BBBY and Amazon competitors, White House referencing GME, and RC buying millions of shares of GameStop. What a time to be alive. WE FUCKING WON
47
71
5
858
18,706
Liquidity retweeted
Busy in DC, and beyond. Will be back soon! Lots of good things coming!
Being told now the virtual session is a no go. The haters are going wild in Chicago @pulte - what happened?
187
162
28
1,148
147,050
Liquidity retweeted
Why did Ryan Cohen say his biggest mistake was investing into GameStop and not Bed bath and beyond which is now in chapter 11 with shareholders still in limbo? BOOMSKIIIII
62
27
2
530
27,341
Liquidity retweeted
hiring mobile engineers to work directly with me. on site in grapevine, tx. remote only if you outwork everyone. [email protected]
493
857
77
5,798
299,940
Liquidity retweeted
Did new bbby just hire a CFO from the same law firm that monitored proceedings with old bbby in Canada. Business combination incoming
18
47
438
15,304
JUST IN, BREAKING RUMORS MADE UP BY ME RYAN COHEN IS PLANNING TO LAUNCH A COMPETITOR TO EBAY CALLED TEDDY. MORE ON THIS STORY AS I MAKE IT UP
65
37
5
761
20,843
This is your last century being broke 🙏
38
15
415
11,363
Liquidity retweeted
DKBFLY bonds are ready to be exchanged for debt or cashed + interest. A gurantor agrees to backstop the full notional value amount. And IBKR still shows the guarantor.
7
32
389
12,002
I'm re-reading some due diligence for DK-Butterfly The bankruptcy plan is so fucking genius Install a Plan Administrator with a broad range of power to settle estate matters explicitly including mergers and amalgamations, make him financially incentivized and aligned with a strong financial outcome and to be in position, just in case there's a change of direction from liquidation to redistribution, while reporting to the Oversight Committee I can't wait to be right.
11
37
2
450
31,957
Ryan Cohen's letter to BBBY 👇 The $1.2bn in debt at the time was entirely the notes that were issued in 2014 Every dollar of those notes was created for the sole purpose of buybacks Gustavo and Tritton continued accelerating the share repurchases despite the company burning cash JPMorgan worked extensively with Gustavo on the buybacks JPMorgan were the underwriters of the notes JPMorgan were used by Ryan Cohen to sell his position, and they leaked the news to everyone before the sale hit the market publicly JPMorgan's head of Global M&A was concerned about Ryan Cohen and asked the BBBY board what their plan was to deal with him JPMorgan and MSC have colluded for fraud historically JPMorgan were removed as senior lenders by Sixth Street in early 2023 after a tug of war for control over the estate The lookback period for fraudulent conveyance in Chapter 11 is around 90 days, 90 days before Chapter 11 filing on April 23rd 2023 is Monday 23 January 2023, right at the time Sixth Street raised capital to pay JPMorgan to stop them forcing the company into Chapter 7 The HBC deal was facilitated to clear ABL obligations All the pieces indicate that JPMorgan fucked up, bad and dug themselves deeper. JPMorgan have paid billions in settlements since 2014. They will pay the waterfall for their reprehensible actions.
17
70
3
432
53,041
Liquidity retweeted
8–the Waterfall: xitter.cf/jake2b/status/20003722… 7–third party release, what is it? xitter.cf/jake2b/status/20007192… 6–released vs releasing party, who is who: xitter.cf/jake2b/status/20010663… 5–how the third party release works: xitter.cf/jake2b/status/20014133… 4–Section 1146: xitter.cf/jake2b/status/20021228…
welcome to the 12 Posts of $BBBYQ -mas. my goal is to try to review and simplify concepts from my research into $BBBY (old). no. 4! having concluded my thoughts about the third-party release I want to put the cherry on top by continuing with the distribution of beneficial interests that will come from the Reorganized NewCo. today we will explore Section 1146, non-voting equity securities and the Liquidating Trust as they are described in the Plan—yes, they are all there! ..and always have been. first we will look at Section 1146: 11 U.S. Code § 1146 - Special tax provisions The issuance, transfer, or exchange of a security, or the making or delivery of an instrument of transfer under a plan confirmed under section 1129 or 1191 of this title, may not be taxed under any law imposing a stamp tax or similar tax. that is a very specific legal definition and I will reiterate, it is not a coincidence that it is found in the Confirmed Plan for this Chapter 11! It exists to provide legal protections that are related to the transactions contemplated by the Plan: yep I do have an order to these posts and as we see in the Plan, the Section 1146 tax exemption is connected to the Asset Sale Transaction, which you will remember is a large component of the third-party release—I hope you’re reading all the posts. these are specific, contextual mentions throughout the Plan and cannot be dismissed as “boilerplate”. exciting! the issuance of securities that will come from the Reorganized entity will be non-voting equity securities. you may be wondering how I am so confident, well you guessed it I just read it from the Plan: a few things I want to go over here. Section 1123(a)(6) states; “11 U.S. Code § 1123 - Contents of plan (6) provide for the inclusion in the charter of the debtor, if the debtor is a corporation, or of any corporation referred to in paragraph (5)(B) or (5)(C) of this subsection, of a provision prohibiting the issuance of nonvoting equity securities, and providing, as to the several classes of securities possessing voting power, an appropriate distribution of such power among such classes, including, in the case of any class of equity securities having a preference over another class of equity securities with respect to dividends, adequate provisions for the election of directors representing such preferred class in the event of default in the payment of such dividends;..” emphasis mine. I highlight this because the reason for this disclosure at all is to make sure the Plan is compliant and confirmable according to the law. normally, non-voting securities are not generally permitted so that when the NewCo emerges there aren't issues with preferred voting power. however, for many reasons which I won’t get into now—i.e. cancellation of Common Stock, Class 6 not voting in favour of the Plan—non-voting securities are permitted. ..and revealed! notice the red square, do you see that interests is not capitalized? this is intentional and the Plan is communicating a general statement, not describing Interests as they are defined in the earlier section of the Plan. to summarize here, there will be beneficial interests that will come along with the assets deposited into the Liquidating Trust, they will meet the definition of being a security and they will be non-voting. spoiler: this is the rights offering, likely warrants. the Liquidating Trust is a big part of this and may get its own post but for now I would like to focus the attention on this section of the Plan: notice the distinction in naming “Holders of applicable Claims” instead of Holders of Claims? as we have said going back to the first post, the legal language is filled with clues that are left behind. this is deliberate use because it refers only to the DIP and FILO lenders. very cool. further down, here’s another really good one: “holder of Claims”; now that is a good one. you guessed it, a holder of Claims and a Holder of Claims imply two different meanings and you know what else? a holder of Claims incorporates a Holder of Interests according to the definitions in the Plan. (important!) we know this by reviewing the legal definition of a “Claim: (5) The term “claim” means— (A) right to payment, whether or not such right is reduced to judgment, liquidated, unliquidated, fixed, contingent, matured, unmatured, disputed, undisputed, legal, equitable, secured, or unsecured; or (B) right to an equitable remedy for breach of performance if such breach gives rise to a right to payment, whether or not such right to an equitable remedy is reduced to judgment, fixed, contingent, matured, unmatured, disputed, undisputed, secured, or unsecured.” a co-debtor, a creditor, a party in interest.. they would have a right to payment. a Holder of Interests may qualify under part (A) and definitely qualifies under part (B) if you have followed the post series when we reviewed the third-party release. aside from that let’s appreciate the plain admission in the second highlight that there are holders of Claims receiving interests in the Liquidating Trust. tough to discredit when it is right there. naturally the next question becomes how is it possible that all these things are not known and in the public eye? I’ll be honest I don’t think these attorneys bill 1000$ and higher for no reason. if you guessed that it’s explained in the plan then you get a bingo. from a great comment here: xitter.cf/youknowwho2b/status/20… we explored my belief that Section 107 allows that only involved parties need to have the full picture and public facing disclosure can be limited. there is a great ongoing discussion there if you are curious: thinking again about “this would not be written if it were not necessary” I would ask that everyone look at the image above and have a look at what I highlighted in the red box. isn't that something? remember: • the holder of Claims is receiving interests in the Liquidating Trust, and; • the holder of Claims incorporates the Holder of Interests, and; • I believe—and have extensively shared—the Holder of Interests can only be a Class 9 shareholder, therefore; • there is a documented and legally protected pathway in the Confirmed Plan, through the Liquidating Trust, where equity shareholders can receive a distribution of interests. until tomorrow!
1
40
1
172
21,899
Response just filed to Ryan Cohen's motion to dismiss the 16b lawsuit Anyone with PACER? courtlistener.com/docket/690…
21
74
7
513
40,568
Liquidity retweeted
It has gone full beyond
466
329
81
5,591
493,842
Liquidity retweeted
The $BBBYQ estate and Ryan Cohen have both requested a pre-motion conference to move for summary judgment on the 3rd anniversary of the Confirmation of the Bankruptcy Plan 🚨👀 One step closer to the finish line 🧸🏁 courtlistener.com/docket/690…
Expert discovery in 20230930-DK-Butterfly-1 v. Cohen concludes tomorrow 👀 Since expert discovery was required, under the Case Management Plan either side will have up to 60 days to move for summary judgment courtlistener.com/docket/690… $BBBYQ 🧱 x 🧱
19
87
13
534
87,812
Ryan Cohen continues to fight the 16b with the former BBBY estate with new dockets filed His core point: they had “no way of knowing his ten percent status” until BBBY publicly updated the share count on April 13, 2022, after he had stopped buying the former $BBBY It seems he wants to wrap this up 💥 Source courtlistener.com/docket/690…
23
46
435
14,831
Defendants Ryan Cohen & RC Ventures request a pre-motion conference on a motion for summary judgment in the DK-Butterfly (BBBY) 16b lawsuit. HE'S LOOKING TO WRAP THIS LAWSUIT UP ASAP!
21
87
8
627
111,199
Just a reminder. Plus there was the death spiral warning on BBBY. Just trying to help out.
Jan 31, 2023 - I tweet “Sell” Banking crisis ensues and banks fail. There is panic and stocks fall. Mar 13, 2023 - I tweet “This crisis could resolve very quickly. I am not seeing true danger here.” March 30, 2023 - I tweet “I was wrong to say sell.” /meme corrected
178
116
39
1,418
687,701