Replying to @JackEllis
I stop, when AI stops gaslighting me!
xitter.cf/angular2react/status/2…
Replying to @manuelmaly
Opus 5.5 -> Planning
Haiku 5.5 -> Implementing
Feels SOOO much better. Only downside, I have to use claude code and can't rely on Pi :-/
Replying to @BackersGamesF
I mean - good? Hopefully they one-up each other until it's not horrible slow? 5sec for a app to start?
Replying to @ryan_doser13
Similar vibe.
news.ycombinator.com/item?id…
It's OK if you don't understand the appeal. It was the same for me with Vercel. "It's a stupid AWS wrapper!?" - nah, that's not the interesting part people are willing to pay for.
No lie detected.
xitter.cf/TheGingerBill/status/2…
Replying to @TheGingerBill
Tried it out on my Macbook Pro M5 with 48GB of RAM - it lagged.
Worse experience than Macromedia Fireworks 8 on my Pentium 3 with 128MB RAM back in the days.
Replying to @manuelmaly
Interesting enough, it's smart enough to not use the build-in tool after this point and went for the CLI tool.
Replying to @mitsuhiko
I'd argue: No.
Quality isn't slop - no matter what or who produced it.
Replying to @michael_kove @mattepstein
AI does write a lot of slop.
Opus 5.5 does a lot better than OpenAI models, but I've yet to come across an implementation I can take as is.
Replying to @ThePrimeagen
NOt here. Don't jynx it for me. I'm not really over Sol yet. Can't lose Opus 5.5 so soon.
Replying to @michael_kove
Yes, agreed.
The more complex the system, the more it's tailored to huge corps.
Replying to @michael_kove
Got it. It's still off - but not by much. But at that level it slowly gets interesting to start to work with tax-write-offs.
I think that's the true purpose of our mad tax laws - subsidizing the tax accountants and their tricks.
Replying to @michael_kove
...that can't be true. You don't pay income tax for your first 13k
ChatGPT calculation looks more realistic. Although, if you just start out or do it as side-business, you'd get a SVS exception and only pay the accident insurance.
Replying to @manuelmaly
Got my big Anthropic subscription back. It's not even a competition currently
Replying to @usernameofryan
I like Terence Taos take. It rings true, that understanding the proofs well, while having enough oversight of the field to understand the higher order implications while being able to communicate these becomes the new game aka "Math 2.0"







