Joined January 2025
It's the Civilization, stupid. And France has lost its own. That young woman in Paris thought she and the people breaking the windows stood for the same thing. Politically, maybe. Ideologically, even, to a degree. Civilizationally – not at all. And civilization is the basis of everything else. A Polish historian, Feliks Koneczny, put it in one sentence: you cannot be civilized in two ways at once. Two people can share a slogan and still live by opposite rules – about property, about law, about violence, about what you owe a stranger. There can be no stable common ground between them. Only a temporary alliance against a common enemy, which ends the moment the windows break. France has lost its civilizational values. Or rather, it has lost the ability to state them. Because saying things openly and plainly was never part of the French way and values. Rhetoric is. The French absorb their rules of civilized life from childhood – the manners, the codes, the unwritten "ça ne se fait pas" – without ever spelling them out. Among themselves, it works. With foreign populations, it fails. You cannot explain a code you have never put into words. You cannot transmit what you cannot say. The rhetoric doesn’t work if you haven’t absorbed it first. And the government that should defend the French way of life now belongs to another civilization itself – however French it looks. The civilization of mental communism: managers, procedures, slogans. It has no instinct to defend a way of life. Only the instinct to administer it. You can integrate people into a civilization, possibly. But you have to be able to state the rules clearly. That is the advantage of plain-spoken cultures: what you can say, you can teach. And what you can teach, you can pass on. It's the civilization, stupid.
“Why are you doing this? Stop it! That’s not what we stand for!” A young French woman who appears to be leftist tries unsuccessfully to stop looters from breaking into a supermarket. Cause and consequence, face to face. I can’t help but feel heartbroken to helplessly watch my country being torn apart.
43
192
9
864
36,425
Reminder that earlier this year, half a million Iranians marched in Toronto. Zero violence. Zero vulgarity. Not one shop looted. No littering or trash anywhere. Full cooperation with and respect for the host country. This is why third worlders hate us. Because we are civilised.
134
1,797
30
7,157
54,672
Dawn Anderson retweeted
Not a single Muslim-owned shop or mosque was looted during the riots in France. On one street in Marseille, where 40% of the population is Muslim, ALL Jewish-owned businesses were set on fire, while not a single Muslim-owned business was touched. The odds of that happening by random chance are 1 in 123 billion. These were targeted pogroms. The rioters had lists of addresses identifying which shops to attack.
541
12,044
403
43,100
617,433
Chad 🙌🏼
187
1,736
83
9,365
147,238
Dawn Anderson retweeted
J’ai entendu dire que la France était finie, qu’il était trop tard pour la sauver. Mais la France est toujours aussi belle, enviable même. Sa grandeur n’a pas disparu, elle ne demande qu’à renaître. Nous avons surmonté en un an un problème cent fois plus grave, sans avoir les moyens dont dispose la France. La France pourrait y arriver en une semaine.
9,330
54,743
3,891
306,109
8,526,231
Dawn Anderson retweeted
By Sebastian Vilar Rodrigez, Jan. 15, 2008 All European Life Died in Auschwitz “I walked down the street in Barcelona, and suddenly discovered a terrible truth - Europe died in Auschwitz. We killed six million Jews and replaced them with 20 million Muslims. In Auschwitz we burned a culture, thought, creativity, talent. We destroyed the chosen people, truly chosen, because they produced great and wonderful people who changed the world. The contribution of this people is felt in all areas of life: science, art, international trade, and above all as the conscience of the world. These are the people we burned. And under the pretense of tolerance, and because we wanted to prove
to ourselves that we were cured of the disease of racism, we opened
our gates to 20 million Muslims, who brought us stupidity and ignorance, religious extremism and lack of tolerance, crime and poverty, due to an unwillingness to work and support their families with pride. They have blown up our trains and turned our beautiful Spanish cities
into the third world, drowning in filth and crime. Shut up in the apartments they receive free money from the government, they plan the murder and destruction of their naive hosts. And thus, in our misery, we have exchanged culture for fanatical
hatred, creative skill for destructive skill, intelligence for backwardness and superstition. We have exchanged the pursuit of peace of the Jews of Europe and their
talent for a better future for their children, their determined clinging to life because life is holy, for those who pursue death, for people consumed by the desire for death for themselves and others, for our children and theirs. What a terrible mistake was made by miserable Europe.”
55
431
35
1,369
31,198
Dawn Anderson retweeted
oh look this video is relevant again
279
1,479
113
10,394
195,976
Dawn Anderson retweeted
Dear France. Don’t worry, there’s an easy fix. Let them build a victory mosque atop the Eiffel Tower that no French may enter, then call you settlers while you let them live and work in France, and others demand a two-state solution. That’ll stop it.
80
887
36
5,411
249,321
Dawn Anderson retweeted
Perdón por mi opinión de extrema derecha, pero creo que saquear tiendas de lujo no va a acabar con la guerra en Palestina.
366
9,732
141
108,360
909,109
Dawn Anderson retweeted
In 1957, a Russian immigrant published a novel of more than a thousand pages built around one question: what happens if the people who make the world run simply stop? Its title is Atlas Shrugged. In France it's called La Grève, The Strike. It wasn't even translated into French until 2011. That tells you something. This morning, I think Elon Musk wrote the sequel. A. Where the book comes from. Ayn Rand was born Alisa Rosenbaum in Saint Petersburg in 1905. As a teenager, she watched Bolshevik soldiers walk into her father's pharmacy and seize it in the name of the people. Her family lost everything. Not to a competitor. To a committee. She fled to America in 1926 and spent the rest of her life writing about one distinction: those who create, and those who seize. B. The story. In Atlas Shrugged, America is sliding into decline. Not because of war. Because of rules. Year after year, a growing class of bureaucrats, regulators and planners decides that production must be controlled, shared "fairly," frozen. They never build anything. They issue directives. The worst one freezes every worker in his job and forces every inventor to hand over his patents for the public good. And one by one, the people who make the country run start disappearing. The best engineers. The industrialists. The inventors. An oil man sets his own wells on fire before vanishing. The whole country keeps repeating a question it doesn't understand: "Who is John Galt?" John Galt is the man behind the disappearances. He has convinced the creators to go on strike. They withdraw to a hidden valley in the Colorado mountains, where everyone keeps what they make and trades freely. And they let the world find out what it looks like without them. The lights go out in New York. The grey men are left alone with their directives, and discover that a directive has never produced a single kilowatt. C. The core idea. The strike isn't about money. It's about consent. Rand's insight is that the system that captures the creators runs on their cooperation. It needs them to keep producing so it has something to redistribute. The bureaucrat is a parasite who needs a host. Remove the host, and he's exposed as what he always was: useless. D. What Musk just did. This morning, Musk announced that next year he will give one of his own SpaceX shares to every kid in America. "The first of many." Here's what's fascinating. It's the strike, run in reverse. Rand's creators withdrew. Musk stays. He keeps building rockets, satellites, AI. But instead of walking away from the system, he walks around it. The value goes straight from the builder to the citizen. No ministry, no agency, no committee in the middle. Rand had to make the creators disappear to prove the bureaucrats were useless. Musk doesn't need to disappear. He just needs to stop routing value through them. Same result. The grey men are left standing in the middle of a pipe nobody uses anymore. E. The difference that changes everything. Rand's strike has a flaw her critics never stopped pointing out: ordinary people are left behind. The creators retreat to their valley. The rest of the country sits in the dark. Musk's version fixes that. He isn't taking the creators out of the world. He's bringing the world into the valley. Every kid in America becomes a shareholder in the machine. Not a spectator of the strike. A participant. That's the alliance being formed right now: builders and citizens, directly, with nothing in between. And the only people who lose that deal are the ones who never built anything. F. Why now, and not in 1957. In Rand's time, the strike was a fantasy. You couldn't produce at scale without the state's permission, and you couldn't reach every citizen without its pipes. In 2026, one founder can build rockets, run a global network from orbit, and pledge equity to 73 million children in a single post. AI will soon do in seconds what a ministry does in years. The tools of the strike finally exist. And they don't require anyone to leave. G. The ending. For seventy years, "Who is John Galt?" was a shrug. A way of saying nothing can be done. In the book, the strike ends when the creators decide the road is clear and walk back into the world to rebuild it. That's the scene we're watching. Not a man leaving. A man coming back, with a gift for every child. The grey men are about to discover what Rand promised them seventy years ago: a world that no longer needs them.
I don't know if you realize what just happened. Elon Musk is completely bypassing the State. For 100 years, we've been told the problem is capital. That it must be captured, taxed, redistributed. With an army of intermediaries standing between those who create wealth and the people: ministries, agencies, commissions, bureaucrats. Musk is doing the opposite. He's taking his capital and giving it directly to the people. One SpaceX share to every kid in America. Not a handout. Not a subsidy. A piece of the machine that's taking humanity to Mars. And he says it himself: this is the first of many. Mises understood this back in 1944: the bureaucrat creates nothing. He administers what others created, following rules that have no connection to the value produced. The day value flows directly from the one who creates it to the one who receives it, the bureaucrat has no function left. That's what's being born right now. A new liberal world order, where the very concept of the State will make less and less sense. The world we're entering is a world of abundance. AI, robots, energy, space. And that abundance won't come through the State, for one simple reason: we have a century of proof that it doesn't work. Redistribution was version 1.0. Direct distribution of capital is 2.0. While France is still debating how to tax builders even more, America is handing stock to its kids. Pick your side.
296
2,097
187
8,791
290,846
Ces images doivent faire le tour du monde. Nos voisins doivent savoir. Lyon l’une des plus grandes villes de France le 17 octobre est l’une des villes les plus touchées. A Lyon, aucun commerce n’a été épargné, oui aucun commerce n’a aucun épargné vous avez bien lu. Toutes les boutiques vidées, vitrines éventrées, stocks dévalisés de la rue de la République aux Jacobins, jusqu’à Confluence. L’office de tourisme de Bellecour pillé puis incendié. Les pillages ont continué toute la nuit et même dimanche matin. Les commerçants avaient barricadé. Ça n’a pas suffi. Des magasins de vêtements, de sport, de luxe, des enseignes grand public, tout y est passé. Le préjudice est tel qu’il faudra des semaines pour le chiffrer. Certains ne rouvriront pas. La France est dans le ravin. Macron en est l’un des principaux responsables. Le pays est hors de contrôle. Le monde doit le savoir.
508
7,827
261
16,165
179,499
Trump calls out Macron and tells it straight: "What's happening in France has to do with immigration, NOT schools... it's immigration!"
760
14,593
299
82,294
616,145
Dawn Anderson retweeted
Es gibt 54 muslimische Länder und ihr kommt in mein Land und ihr beschwert euch über meine Kleidung, Schinken und Hunde?? Fickt euch!!
2,098
18,632
571
112,450
3,321,924
Dawn Anderson retweeted
NAZA, le documentaire de Yuval Abraham et Rachel Szor produit par The Guardian, a reçu le Prix spécial du jury à Venise et vingt-cinq minutes d’ovation. Il sort en France depuis le 12 octobre. Sa thèse tient en un mot : génocide. J’ai regardé ce film en juriste. Vingt-quatre témoins sans visage, sans grade, sans rien. Aucune frappe datée, aucune cible nommée, aucun document. Un chiffre, 500 morts civils anticipés pour une cible, lancé par une seule voix et démenti catégoriquement par l’armée. Des sous-titres qui ajoutent aux témoins ce qu’ils ne disent pas. Pas un juriste à l’écran, pas une règle citée, pas un mot sur le Hamas. Surtout, le film porte dans son titre la réfutation de sa thèse. Nezek agavi, dommage collatéral, désigne l’estimation préalable des pertes civiles d’une attaque dirigée contre un objectif militaire. C’est l’article 57 du Protocole additionnel I. Une armée qui compte les civils avant de frapper, qui avertit, qui évacue, puis qui compte ceux qui restent, ne décrit pas une entreprise d’extermination. Elle décrit un processus de ciblage, que l’on peut critiquer frappe par frappe, mais qui exclut la seule déduction raisonnable d’une intention de détruire un peuple, selon le critère fixé par la Cour internationale de Justice. Distinction, proportionnalité, précautions, outils d’aide à la décision, intention génocidaire : j’ai repris chaque point avec les textes et la jurisprudence, de la CIJ au TPIY, de la Cour suprême d’Israël à la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme. En voulant prouver un génocide, « NAZA » filme le contraire. sarahscialom.substack.com/p/…
261
1,159
67
4,459
107,196
Dawn Anderson retweeted
🚨BREAKING: Hungarian Prime Minister sends a message to the EU: "Perhaps it is now clear to everyone why Hungary has the strictest possible approach to migration, and why we will NOT weaken our border protection or immigration policy under any pressure." 🇭🇺🇫🇷
789
18,861
473
113,104
1,304,680
France has FREE health care, paid parental leave, paid family leave, FREE child care, FREE preschool, 5 weeks paid vacation, a 35 hour work week, generous unemployment and housing benefits, and heavily subsidized higher education. Everything the left says they want AND THEY'RE STILL PROTESTING AND BURNING SHIT DOWN.
4,020
27,211
1,807
111,169
2,771,750
Dawn Anderson retweeted
Bibi said that Macron called him on October 7 and urged a ceasefire. Bibi said no, Hamas are monsters and the way to solve this is to destroy them. “If we don’t stop Hamas here, you’ll see them in Paris, and that’s exactly what is happening right now.”
231
2,771
73
9,977
82,543
Dawn Anderson retweeted
德国 DW 电视台拍过一部关于巴黎郊区移民的纪录片。 镜头对准了生活在同一片区域的两个群体。 一边是大约七万人的法国华人。 在巴黎北郊的欧贝维利耶,他们建起了欧洲最大的服装批发中心。 这批人的生活方式很简单: 起早贪黑,开小作坊、看店、跑货运。 赚了钱继续投入生意,遇到难处自己想办法扛。 平时低调安静,很少向政府伸手要特殊补贴,也不上街制造混乱。 几十年下来,越来越多家庭买了房,把生意做了起来。 另一边,是同样生活在这片街区的北非移民群体。 从整体上看,他们在当地的经济融入相对滞后。 但纪录片捕捉到了一个细微却现实的心态变化: 一种把自食其力者视作威胁的情绪,正在悄悄蔓延。 按片子里的观察, 一些融入受挫的人,习惯以受害者自居,觉得社会欠自己太多。 可当他们转头看到身旁的华人时,心态变了。 他们不仅没有去学怎么做生意,反而把华人当成了竞争对手。 这种敌意到底从何而来? 最现实的冲突在于:华人的日子越过越好,受害者叙事就越难自圆其说。 大家同样是外来者,同样面对异国他乡的壁垒。 甚至华人刚来的时候连法语都不会讲,更谈不上本地人脉。 如果有人靠一天干十几个小时,能把日子一点点撑起来, 那句“我们过不好全怪外界不公”,就很难再理直气壮地说出口。 一个闷头自立的人,往往会让习惯归咎环境的人感到刺眼。 更深层的错位在于对财富的理解。 在很多索取者的认知里,财富是一块固定死的大饼。 他们看不到那些批发店是怎样一箱一箱货物搬出来的, 只觉得华人的店铺赚到了钱,就是占了自己的便宜。 再加上华人素来习惯忍让,遇到纠纷往往选择息事宁人, 这种心态上的失衡,很快就落成了现实中的治安麻烦。 抢劫、尾随、街头袭击,接二连三指向这群只想安分过日子的人。 靠双手养活自己、靠信誉积累财富,放在任何健全的社会都是最基本的尊严。 但如果一个地方习惯了把受害者身份当成通行的筹码, 那个默默把日子过好的人, 往往最先成为被针对的对象。
803
13,559
861
46,942
2,483,203
French police warned protesters: "If you approach the Louvre Museum in Paris, we will open fire!"
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
French police issued no such warning to open fire near the Louvre. Coverage of the Oct 17-19 protests details non-lethal crowd control like tear gas amid clashes and a small peaceful student blockade of the museum. thelocal.fr/20261019/prote… lemonde.fr/societe/live/2… leparisien.fr/societe/direct…
2,382
5,931
572
49,314
2,285,336
Dawn Anderson retweeted
BREAKING: French right-wing groups take to the streets to stop looting in Lyon. They are chanting: “the streets and France belong to us”
1,001
3,359
459
21,117
535,470