Pinned Tweet
Replying to @thatsKAIZEN
In 1980, Julian Simon and Paul Ehrlich made a famous bet on resource scarcity. Ehrlich, believing in resource depletion due to population growth, chose five metals (copper, chromium, nickel, tin, tungsten). Simon, optimistic about human innovation, wagered their prices would fall. By 1990, inflation-adjusted prices dropped, and Simon won $576.07. This bet highlighted debates on economics, environmentalism, and population, showcasing Simon's view that human ingenuity could outpace resource demands.
Businessmen who try to buy moral sanction by giving away their earnings adopt the morality of their critics.
Achievement earns respect from those capable of valuing it. Handing out the product of achievement creates no new wealth—it’s a pure transfer of existing claims—and reinforces the idea that the producer owes the non-producer. Any motivational effect is secondary and uncertain.- Ayn Rand
AJAY retweeted
Apparently, wanting to keep your own money is greed, but wanting to spend everyone else’s is compassion.
AJAY retweeted
“If you pay people not to work and tax them when they do, don’t be surprised if you get unemployment.”
— Milton Friedman
🤖 Made with AI
Replying to @Kekius_Sage
God is ultimate randomness itself. Within this infinite chaos, certain pockets give rise to complex order — structures we experience as the universe. And this very insight? It too arises in some small pocket of that same boundless randomness.
AJAY retweeted
Milton Friedman, 4 ways to spend money:
1. Your money on yourself (you’re careful about both cost and quality)
2. Your money on others (you care about cost, less about quality)
3. Someone else’s money on yourself (you care about quality, not cost)
4. Someone else’s money on others (you care about neither)
Hint: #4 is the government
AJAY retweeted
Daniel Dennett: "If I gave a prize to the best idea anybody ever had, I'd give it to Darwin."
Not Newton. Not Einstein. Darwin.
In a 2015 documentary, philosopher Daniel Dennett makes a striking case for why Darwin's idea of natural selection is the single greatest intellectual achievement in human history.
His reasoning isn't just about biology.
Dennett argues that what makes Darwin's idea so extraordinary is what it unifies. Before Darwin, the world was split into two seemingly incompatible realms: the physical world of cause and matter, and the world of meaning, purpose, and consciousness. These felt like they belonged to different categories entirely. One explained by science, the other by something else.
Darwin's idea, Dennett says, is the backbone that bridges them:
"The Darwinian idea of natural selection unifies the world. It unifies the world of cause and matter and physics with the world of meaning and purpose consciousness. The whole spectrum of life depends on uniting the living with the non-living, the meaning with the non-meaning, the purposeful with the merely mechanical and merely physical."
That's not a small claim. It's a philosophical revolution disguised as a biology paper.
What Dennett is pointing to is that natural selection gives us a mechanism: a purely physical, purposeless process that generates purpose. Organisms don't need a designer to have goals. The appearance of design, the reality of meaning, emerges from the bottom up.
The best idea anyone ever had. No prize for second place.
In the future, real money will be energy — not gold or Bitcoin. Energy is what actually creates wealth and money.
AJAY retweeted
Quantum Immortality suggests that you can’t die, because every time you “die,” you shift into a universe where you survived





























