Coach, Leader, Agilst. Avid learner, Teacher, Husband, Father. Tweets are my own.

Michigan
Joined February 2007
AJ Morris retweeted
Same design. Two launch days. AI vibe-coded: gray LinkedIn card, no sitemap, a contact form that goes nowhere, and a Friday security advisory nobody is aware of. WordPress: a quiet Friday. itlooksdone.com
4
5
2
20
1,279
We do not get outside enough these days. @apple tries to track time in daylight but that’s not the best dimension to track. If you are near a window it can track as if you are outside. I’ve found a way to track through multiple data sources a way to track whether you are truly outside or not. Does this type of app interest you?
1
73
This is an entrepreneur I follow on X. I like his content. But then I saw the "Made with AI" tag, which seems to be a new feature on X. A handful of implications here, and where I think the future of text-based content is going: 1. This tag decreases perceived value. - As soon as you say something was "Made With AI," you remove the reader's need for critical thinking. They will automatically assume the content is "bad" or "slop"—even if it's not. For example, I enjoyed this post. And I agreed with it. Regardless of whether or not AI wrote every word or a person did. 2. Adding this tag to text-based content also has major implications for collaboration. - For example, if founders use ghostwriters, why don't posts say, "Written by my ghostwriter?" Or what if a founder writes it but has a VA post and schedule the content. Should posts say, "Scheduled by my assistant?" Or what if a founder works with an editor and an editor makes suggestions that improve the quality of the post but ultimately "change it" in a meaningful way? Should posts say, "Half of this was me, half of this was the editor I work with?" Etc. This is what makes AI-assisted work, specifically writing, so hard to nail down. 3. Adding this tag also has major implications for digital tools & technology leverage. - I don't know if this post was 100% written and published using ChatGPT/Claude, or if it was a remixed version of something human-written from an existing library of content, or if it was actually completely human written but tagged as "Made with AI" because he used an AI scheduling tool. For what it's worth: I firmly believe, of all the skills to fully outsource to AI, writing shouldn't be one of them. BUT... there are many, many use cases where AI can be helpful in scaling and automating entirely human-written content. For example, I pull short-form content out of my long-form content all the time. - I write a long-form newsletter (100% myself) - I use AI to extract short-form from it (only using "my language," not my voice, I mean verbatim my words from my long-form newsletter) - And I use AI/scheduling platforms to pump out volume AI isn't doing any real writing or thinking. And yet, does that mean these republished or remixed versions should be tagged as Made With AI? I think the future is going to be very murky for where to draw the line on human-writing, AI-writing, and AI-assisted-human-writing.
24
1
1
75
7,937
Alright @bot fans. What's your favorite bot? Starting to build some out now.
1
92
. @corymiller303 is the embodiment of this. Lives it. Every. Day.
I just want to see good people win
2
171
Self-awareness isn't realizing you're busy. It's noticing which fires you keep lighting yourself — then pretending someone else started them.
3
157
One self-awareness drill that takes 5 minutes: Before you leave work, write down the one thing you avoided today. Don't fix it. Just name it. Patterns show up faster when you stop lying to yourself about "no time."
1
146
Most people don't need another productivity system. They need the courage to admit the current one is covering for a decision they won't make.
106
Buying ChatGPT for the whole company is not an AI strategy. It is a software license with hope attached. Strategy starts when one team changes how work actually moves.
1
1
129
Before you buy another AI seat, write this down: 1) the job to improve 2) who owns the pilot 3) what "good" looks like in 2 weeks If you can't fill those three, you're shopping, not implementing.
111
Most AI rollouts I see start with a tool demo. Then a Slack channel. Then silence. The orgs that stick start with one painful workflow and one owner — not a platform tour.
82
One habit that keeps my week from turning into noise: Before Slack, before email — write the one outcome that would make this week a win. Nothing else is urgent until that lands.
1
2
135
If you're still the bottleneck on "small" decisions, you don't have a team problem. You have a trust problem you're calling quality control.
101
One system that bought me back 3 hours a week: I stopped answering "quick questions" in real-time. Slack/text gets a reply window (mine's 2-4pm). Urgent gets a phone call. Most "urgent" things figured themselves out by 2pm.
1
125
Before you buy another AI tool this week, write the job it replaces in one sentence. If you can't name the weekly task, the hours, and who owns the new workflow after, you're collecting shelfware. Tool last. Job first.
1
124
I disappeared for a stretch on purpose. Not a productivity hack. Just life, family, and work that didn't need an audience. Coming back slower than my old habit wanted. Turns out the feed doesn't notice. Your people do when you're ready.
1
5
147
I’ve been quite quiet on here lately. I took the go disappear for 6 months to heart. What did I miss? What do you want to know about my AI journey?
76