AJ Morris retweeted
So, your new AI generated website looks done, huh? Is it?
itlooksdone.com
AJ Morris retweeted
Same design. Two launch days.
AI vibe-coded: gray LinkedIn card, no sitemap, a contact form that goes nowhere, and a Friday security advisory nobody is aware of.
WordPress: a quiet Friday.
itlooksdone.com
We do not get outside enough these days. @apple tries to track time in daylight but that’s not the best dimension to track. If you are near a window it can track as if you are outside. I’ve found a way to track through multiple data sources a way to track whether you are truly outside or not. Does this type of app interest you?
I wonder if @bot or @xai will make something like this soon. Wish I would have bought one when they were in stock
openai.com/supply/co-lab/wor…
AJ Morris retweeted
The M6 and M5 Ultra have incredible potential for local AI on macOS, for different reasons.
I can’t wait to try these machines. Some thoughts:
macstories.net/notes/the-pot…
AJ Morris retweeted
This is an entrepreneur I follow on X. I like his content.
But then I saw the "Made with AI" tag, which seems to be a new feature on X.
A handful of implications here, and where I think the future of text-based content is going:
1. This tag decreases perceived value. - As soon as you say something was "Made With AI," you remove the reader's need for critical thinking. They will automatically assume the content is "bad" or "slop"—even if it's not. For example, I enjoyed this post. And I agreed with it. Regardless of whether or not AI wrote every word or a person did.
2. Adding this tag to text-based content also has major implications for collaboration. - For example, if founders use ghostwriters, why don't posts say, "Written by my ghostwriter?" Or what if a founder writes it but has a VA post and schedule the content. Should posts say, "Scheduled by my assistant?" Or what if a founder works with an editor and an editor makes suggestions that improve the quality of the post but ultimately "change it" in a meaningful way? Should posts say, "Half of this was me, half of this was the editor I work with?" Etc. This is what makes AI-assisted work, specifically writing, so hard to nail down.
3. Adding this tag also has major implications for digital tools & technology leverage. - I don't know if this post was 100% written and published using ChatGPT/Claude, or if it was a remixed version of something human-written from an existing library of content, or if it was actually completely human written but tagged as "Made with AI" because he used an AI scheduling tool.
For what it's worth: I firmly believe, of all the skills to fully outsource to AI, writing shouldn't be one of them.
BUT... there are many, many use cases where AI can be helpful in scaling and automating entirely human-written content.
For example, I pull short-form content out of my long-form content all the time.
- I write a long-form newsletter (100% myself)
- I use AI to extract short-form from it (only using "my language," not my voice, I mean verbatim my words from my long-form newsletter)
- And I use AI/scheduling platforms to pump out volume
AI isn't doing any real writing or thinking.
And yet, does that mean these republished or remixed versions should be tagged as Made With AI?
I think the future is going to be very murky for where to draw the line on human-writing, AI-writing, and AI-assisted-human-writing.
. @corymiller303 is the embodiment of this. Lives it. Every. Day.







