interssted in the intersection of Our History, UAP's, Cutting Edge Science, and Where It All Leads
America
Joined October 2008
- Tweets11K
- Following899
- Followers192
- Likes3.2K
Pinned Tweet
What This Account Is About
1/ This account explores ancient civilizations, UAP data, and modern physics.
2/ Not to prove theories — but to examine interpretation.
3/ Sources matter. Assumptions matter more.
4/ Mystery isn’t evidence — but neither is dismissal.
5/ Ancient people weren’t ignorant.
Modern people aren’t omniscient.
6/ Questions drive understanding.
7/ Disagreement is welcome.
8/ Certainty is not.
9/ What topic should we examine first?
Thoughts on this...I am using party spending as a Negative Binomial Regression. Without it I model the electorate as D+3.2, but with it comes in D+2.7. Essentialy takes lock, lean and toss-up then checks the spending outlays and extrapolates whether they match the modeling.
@TonerousHyus
What We Believe retweeted
Like there's a reason this @$$hole didn't post the dollar amounts...
Bad form ya fkn nerd... – at Fayetteville, NC
VFW & DAV employees overwhelmingly donate to Democrats
No surprise they are working with Soros-backed VoteVets and Labor Unions to kill the Take Care of America’s Veterans Act.
This bill builds upon President Trump's historic veteran legislative accomplishments of his first term: VA Accountability and the MISSION Act.
They always put politics over veterans.
What We Believe retweeted
I have to ask, are you Republicans really this retarded? Can you not read the room?
First, you deliberately hijacked the #MajorRichardStarAct to put in you Omnibus garbage bill, then you watered it down by NOT giving us our full retirement but only about 60% with your "LESSER OF" language, then you want to make future disabled veterans "pay" for it, then you have the absolute temerity to hold the #MajorRichardStarAct hostage?
And you put this on social media. You really made this post.
My guys. My brothers in citizenship.
You can take TCAVA and shove it up your ass. Then spin on it.
I have been a Republican all of my life and I have always voted Republican. But now you have shown your absolute DISDAIN for us, the Combat Wounded Veterans, while simultaneously using us as PROPS for your reelection campaign.
Historically, your mid-terms are sketchy at best, and you really want a WAR with Combat Wounded Veterans? You want US as your adversary? What do you numbskulls think is going to happen? I'm going to go out and vote for you clowns? I won't vote Democrat unless there's a candidate who isn't insane, but guess what bud, I'm not voting for you.
And neither is my wife. Or my in-laws. Or my kids.
The General Public is VERY sympathetic to Combat Wounded Veterans because we pay the bill for everyone to enjoy this life that we live.
You do not. You sit around and have staffers write stuff for you. You are almost worthless as you pontificate and make asinine posts like this.
The American Legion just fractured. They are now fighting their Leadership to correct the error of their ways and join the VFW in supporting the #MajorRichardStarAct.
And guess what? If YOU do not back down, YOU WILL BE NEXT. You will fracture. You will suffer. You will lose seats.
And over what? The price of this bill is worth about 3 Learing Centers in Minnesota.
You want to go to WAR with Disabled over this? Who the hell are you people?
The Take Care of America’s Veterans Act is the only pathway forward for the Maj. Richard Star Act.
That’s not a talking point, it’s a fact.
This bill is fully paid for and finally delivers long overdue relief.
60,000 combat-wounded, disabled veterans have waited long enough for their earned benefits. It’s time to put election year politics aside and deliver for veterans and their families.
What We Believe retweeted
As a retired military lawyer & current int'l law prof, I really wish "legal experts" actually understood what "war crimes" are so they could speak with authority and stop screaming bloody murder falsely accusing Trump of committing them.
This....all damn day
Gold Star wife here.
When ISIS killed your wife, you supported going after the people responsible. You understood exactly why we were fighting and never called it “Israel’s war.”
My husband, Alan, was killed by Iranian proxies in Iraq. And now, after decades, the fight is finally leading back to the number one state sponsor of terrorism in the world.
You understood it when it was your loss. Now you’re minimizing it when it’s mine.
You don’t get to redefine this war just because it’s not your grief anymore.
Myths don’t survive because they’re false.
They survive because they compress transitions facts can’t hold.
Some places are remembered not because of what happened there, but because history keeps happening there.
That’s not coincidence. It’s structure.
This connects directly to something we were just discussing: timelines move more often than the public realizes.
If key Iron Age pottery phases are off by even ~100 years, that’s not a footnote — it reshapes historical causality.
For archaeologists here: how resilient are our broader chronologies when foundational dating anchors like ceramics shift?
Where do revisions ripple most?
So what's the discovery? In Greek Archaeology- a lot of sites are dated by pottery. But there is growing evidence Iron Age pottery may be wrong by 100+years!That's a big gap for that time.
Dig Deeper: I Excavated A Site That Could Change Greek History youtu.be/rVkD4yrIDmk?si=Fc18…
This is an interesting reinterpretation of Newgrange’s alignment — especially the claim that it misses the solstice sunrise by ~10°.
A genuine question for archaeologists and archaeoastronomers here: how much deviation from a solstitial target is considered meaningful versus noise from construction limits, horizon effects, or ritual intent?
This is the most extraordinary find in human history. You have sampled but a mere taste here on X.
Book arriving April 2026. Flows from TES's Star of Regulus and ends with this paradigm-shattering and novel knowledge set for mankind.
The predictive successes and statistical confirmations are overwhelming...
As an enrolled member of Native Tribe this fascinates me...
This Post is from an account that no longer exists. Learn more
Plato describes Atlantis with surprising geographic detail — but historians still debate whether it was allegory, misremembered history, or something else entirely.
Recent advances in seafloor mapping have renewed interest in submerged landscapes along the Iberian margin.
For historians and archaeologists here: what would count as credible evidence that Plato was referencing a real place rather than constructing a philosophical narrative?
Serious question, not provocation: archaeology revises timelines more often than the public realizes — the White Sands footprints pushed human presence in the Americas back by thousands of years.
For archaeologists and historians here: how do you guard against dismissing anomalous evidence too early when the field itself keeps recalibrating its own “settled” chronologies?
Where’s the line between healthy skepticism and premature closure?
The Tic Tac UAP isn’t controversial because of what pilots saw.
It’s controversial because Congress says it still doesn’t have full access to the data — 20 years later.
If this was foreign tech, why the secrecy?
If it wasn’t, why the ambiguity?
At what point does “classified” become “misleading”?
Quantum teleportation experiments now routinely transmit quantum states across large distances — not matter, but information encoded in entangled systems.
What’s striking isn’t the distance itself, but what it says about how information, measurement, and causality actually work.
For physicists here: what do you think is most misunderstood about quantum teleportation — and where do you see its real limits and implications?
Closing out for the evening — but before I do, let’s take in Jupiter and its breathtaking lightning.
Captured by NASA’s Juno spacecraft, these brief green flashes are thought to be lightning within Jupiter’s turbulent ammonia-water clouds.
A reminder that even familiar physics can look otherworldly at planetary scale.
If Spacetime Isn’t Fundamental, What Changes?
1/ Some physicists argue spacetime may not be fundamental.
2/ If true, movement itself may be emergent — not absolute.
3/ Ancient texts often describe travel without distance.
4/ This doesn’t mean they understood physics.
5/ It means human intuition struggles with non-intuitive phenomena.
6/ Language collapses complexity into metaphor.
7/ We may be repeating the same mistake today with UAP terminology.
8/ New physics often looks impossible before it looks obvious.
9/ What concepts today might future science consider naïve?
UAP Reports and Observer Bias
1/ Most UAP reports aren’t about aliens — they’re about unidentified behavior.
2/ Pilots describe motion without inertia, sonic boom, or visible propulsion.
3/ Physics doesn’t say this is impossible — it says we don’t know how.
4/ The key issue isn’t what the objects are.
It’s how humans describe unfamiliar motion.
5/ Ancient cultures did the same thing — using gods, chariots, or spirits.
6/ Modern observers use “craft” because that’s our frame of reference.
7/ Different era, same cognitive process.
8/ Interpretation fills gaps faster than evidence.
9/ How much of UAP language is shaped by expectation rather than observation?