QUANTUM RESISTANCE MAY SOUND FAR AWAY, BUT INFRASTRUCTURE HAS TO PREPARE EARLY One topic @Starknet has been talking about more explicitly is quantum resistance. Starknet argues that the combination of STARK proofs and smart accounts provides a practical path toward quantum resistance without requiring a network-wide fork. I think this offers a different way to look at Starknet. Not just: "How many TPS?" "How low are the fees?" But also: "How resilient is this architecture as technology evolves?" Blockchain infrastructure is built to last for years, potentially decades. That's why topics like cryptography, proof systems, and account architecture can sometimes matter more than a few short-term benchmark numbers. It's one of the reasons I continue to watch Starknet closely in the ZK space. #Starknet #STARK #ZK #Ethereum

A wallet or trading app may already have the users it needs. The harder question is how to create more value from that existing distribution without rebuilding the product around a new service. This is where the partner model from @agenticscredit gets interesting. The ACS widget can live directly inside an app, so users stay on the same interface while getting scored and entering the credit funnel. Meanwhile, Agentics.credit handles the downstream infrastructure: scoring, risk controls, credit provisioning, and payouts. For the partner, there's no separate model to operate or capital pool to manage. The integration can also create a standing revenue stream, with 30% of fees from referred users shared for their lifetime. I see the appeal here: keep the user relationship on your own surface, add new functionality, and let the underlying infrastructure do the heavy lifting.