Andrew Jackson (@acjackson59) header
Andrew Jackson (@acjackson59) profile picture

Farmer committed to Regenerative agriculture, bio-diversity and preventing climate change. Diversified into, restaurant, farm park and high ropes course.

North Lincolnshire
Joined April 2015
Photo by Andrew Jackson (@acjackson59)Photo by Andrew Jackson (@acjackson59)Photo by Andrew Jackson (@acjackson59)Photo by Andrew Jackson (@acjackson59)Photo by Andrew Jackson (@acjackson59)Photo by Andrew Jackson (@acjackson59)Photo by Andrew Jackson (@acjackson59)
Andrew Jackson retweeted
Andy Burnham would rather hand over £450mil every year to cut university fees for EU students, than reverse Labour’s freeze of repayment thresholds for Plan 2 student loans. Politics is about choices. It seems that foreign students are more important to Labour than English students.
79
198
11
666
16,382
Andrew Jackson retweeted
I find articles like this hilarious. They're written as though there's this thing happening that we can't explain. Look at the data... quiet quitting is particularly pronounced among Gen Z and younger millennials. Then look at the backdrop to their careers. These people have watched their futures being spent on bailouts, lockdowns and furlough. Even if you work extremely hard and earn promotions (which is far from guaranteed), wages in the UK are so crap, and the cost of living so high, that the rewards often amount to very little. The extra pay can be negligible. The extra effort and responsibility are not. And if you've worked hard, trained and made your way up the greasy corporate pole, there's a good chance you've watched entry-level wages creep ever closer to yours. You might reasonably be asking yourself why you bothered in the first place. Since the pandemic began, the National Living Wage has increased by nearly 55%. If you're someone with years of experience, training, progression and hard work under your belt, and your wages haven't kept pace, why wouldn't you question the value of all that effort? The incentive has been inverted. This is wage compression, and we're now witnessing the second- and third-order effects governments seem so oblivious to. When the financial reward for taking on more responsibility diminishes, so does the incentive to do it. And this is what's happening. People are moving the dial they actually have control over… how much they give a shit about their job. And I don't blame them. I think people are also starting to realise that much of the reward for their hard work is swallowed up by the ever-growing, increasingly wasteful blob that is the British state. It's like having someone sitting on your shoulders, stealing half your food, getting heavier by the day, and repeatedly slapping you around the face as you try to go about your life.
86
310
24
3,113
445,786
Andrew Jackson retweeted
Labour Minister Emma Reynolds says employers are 'not workers'. She is Chief Secretary to the Treasury. This in the level of economic illiteracy and incompetence of this Labour government. Clowns, totally unfit for office. express.co.uk/news/politics/…
60
297
6
1,003
5,982
Andrew Jackson retweeted
WTF? A Prime Minister who has never run a business in his life demands answers because a private business fails? … let me help you, Andy & co. A retail chain needs to stay in fashion, needs to go with the flow! … But you and successive governments don’t like their “tat” products (mostly sourced off shore to sell them at £1!!! That the whole point right?) anyway… for free (without a taxpayer funded £MULTIMILLION enquiry I’ll tell you the problems… (you’re welcome) ▪️massively increased regulations and compliance costs. ▪️cheap tat sourced from abroad, with rising shipping and transport costs. ▪️Hit by increased minimum wages and employer National Insurance. ▪️Hit by rising rents and business rates. ▪️Hit by soaring energy bills and net zero costs. ▪️Hit by higher interest rates. ▪️Hit by consumers with less disposable income. ▪️Hit by the soaring cost of borrowing to buy stock months in advance. ▪️Hit by higher insurance premiums. ▪️Hit by shoplifting, organised theft and security costs. ▪️Hit by packaging taxes, recycling regulations and environmental compliance costs.( which you just throw into general taxation, non of it changes the weather) ▪️Hit by higher fuel, warehousing and distribution costs. ▪️Hit by increased employment costs, pensions and statutory obligations. ▪️Hit by competition from overseas online retailers operating with very different overheads.( duty free … for foreign businesses oops) ▪️And hit by the impossibility of passing those costs onto customers, who shop at Poundland precisely because they need cheap stuff! … which isn’t cheap anymore (see above) Every single time you add something on … so do they! And the idiot, deluded politicians who have made Britain more and more expensive and difficult to do business in, are demanding to know why businesses are struggling? You are all moronic. My work here is done 🤡
367
2,521
132
8,839
125,042
Andrew Jackson retweeted
The Cost of Britain 🇬🇧 Here is the single MADDEST number in today’s Budget - and the Chancellor didn’t mention it once in his speech 👀 From April, the National Living Wage rises to £13.21 an hour. For a full-time 40-hour week, that is £27,477 a year. That’s GREAT right?? 🤔 At the same time, today’s Budget leaves the 40% Higher Rate tax threshold FROZEN at £50,270 right through until April 2031. Do the maths on that: In Britain today, earning just 1.8x the minimum wage now classes you as a Higher Rate taxpayer. When the 40% tax band was created, it was meant for the top 3.5% of earners - bank directors and senior executives. Today, a skilled tradesperson, experienced nurse, police sergeant or salaried worker earning 1.8x the legal minimum wage hands over: ❌ 42p of every extra pound to HMRC (40% Income Tax + 2% NI) ❌ 51p of every extra pound if they have a student loan That single threshold freeze is quietly pulling an extra £34 billion a year out of working people’s pay packets - without the government ever having to announce a headline tax rise. Pushing minimum wage up from the bottom Whilst freezing the 40% tax trap at the top How can earning 1.8x minimum wage possibly be classed as a “higher earner” in 2026?
128
618
38
2,719
216,936
Andrew Jackson retweeted
**You need to watch Zelenskyy's interview with Steven Bartlett.** Sitting in front of the camera is an utterly exhausted, at times visibly broken man who has spent almost five years personally managing a war, making critical decisions day and night. From the very first minutes, you can see just how drained he is. When asked the routine question, "How are you?" he replies that he barely sleeps because he spends his nights in military group chats, moving the last remaining air defense systems from one region to another. Two stories are particularly heartbreaking. The first is about a missile that struck a children's playground within seconds, while parents watched from their apartment windows as their children were torn apart. The second is about presenting posthumous military awards to the families of fallen soldiers: "You present an award to a father, feel his strong hand, and then he quietly asks, 'Can we hug?' At that moment, I simply cease to exist inside. These people are gone. They will never be the same again." When the host tries to take him back into his past, showing old photographs from Kryvyi Rih, his student comedy performances, his voice acting as Paddington Bear, and scenes from *Servant of the People*, Zelenskyy looks at them with detachment, almost as though he is watching someone else's life. He also recalls February 2022 without any attempt to portray himself as a hero. He says that for the first 20 days, he simply ran from office to office on adrenaline, calling everyone he could and trying to organize deliveries of water and food to Kyiv. Fear and the full realization of what had happened only caught up with him three weeks later, when Bucha was liberated and mass graves containing hundreds of murdered civilians were discovered. Using Bucha as an example, he explains why advice from outsiders to simply negotiate a quick deal causes him such deep frustration: "Imagine that in the United States or Britain, a mass grave is discovered containing 500 tortured people with their hands tied. How could you simply forgive everything after that?" The rest of the conversation revolves around the deadlock in which Ukrainians, and indeed everyone involved, now find themselves. Zelenskyy explains the causes of the war in simple terms: Moscow is trying to forcibly rebuild the Soviet empire because Ukraine's integration into Europe would finally bury that project. But when the conversation turns to the present, there is unmistakable bitterness in his words. Almost one-fifth of Ukraine's territory is occupied. The east is under relentless bombardment. Cities are left without electricity. People are dying every single day. Meanwhile, every discussion about a ceasefire runs into the same demand: Kyiv must withdraw even farther from its fortified positions, without any guarantees that Russia will not launch another offensive a year later. Toward the end, the conversation turns to Trump and Ukrainian strikes on Russian oil facilities. Trump publicly reprimands Zelenskyy over attacks on Russian refineries because he fears rising diesel prices for American farmers ahead of the elections. And this is where you can see just how deeply that approach affects Zelenskyy. His country is burning. Moscow has rejected his proposal for a mutual halt to attacks on energy infrastructure. Patriot missiles paid for by Europe are being redirected by the Americans to the Middle East. And somehow, Zelenskyy is the one being blamed for fuel prices in the United States. The entire interview leaves you with a profoundly bleak feeling. Here is a man trapped between the daily deaths of people in his own country and the pragmatic bargaining of allies who have their own elections, their own interests, and their own political calculations. And yet, he can no longer step away from this responsibility. **Watch it.**
266
2,045
109
6,983
221,512
Andrew Jackson retweeted
Only in the UK would we make energy so expensive that we can't produce fertiliser here any more and them impose a carbon border tax on imports. 70% of fert comes from the EU, which won't have a carbon tax. But 30% would, which will likely increase demand and cost for EU fert.
43
210
21
507
12,623
BREAKING: GLOVES OFF! President Zelenskyy RIPS into Trump's monstrous diesel deal with Putin as a "betrayal" and warns that he is not on "the right side of history." And he was just getting warmed up... "It appears that President Trump, to quote a phrase that we would use over here, has thrown you under the bus," Piers Morgan said to the Ukrainian President during an interview. "He's done this diesel deal with Vladimir Putin, having just announced renewed sanctions, which people find inexplicable. And now you have a situation where President Trump announced an energy ceasefire, and within hours Vladimir Putin launches an absolute bombardment of Ukraine, aimed directly at your energy." "Do you feel betrayed by what has been happening?" Morgan asked. "Really, yes. Really, between us," said Zelenskyy. "But it's a little bit more complicated than just my emotions or my feelings. Our country has to survive." Trump recently blindsided Ukraine, our European allies, and the American people who oppose Russia's brutal invasion by announcing a "deal" to let Putin flood the global markets with millions of barrels of diesel. He has tried to spin it as a win, but it's nothing more than cowardly capitulation, a desperate attempt to wrestle down out-of-control gas prices ahead of the midterm elections. Those gas prices, ironically and tragically enough, are a direct result of his disastrous, pointless Iran War. Trump created this problem, then stabbed an ally in the back to "fix" it. Now, the Kremlin will get a massive influx of new cash to help fund their war machine and slaughter more innocent Ukrainian men, women, and children. "When you found out that President Trump had done this deal with Putin, twenty-one days after new sanctions, what was your immediate response to that?" asked Morgan. "It's a pity that we are losing a strong partner," Zelenskyy said bluntly. "So this is my opinion." "You think you're losing America?" asked Morgan. "Yeah. But not because of us. We can't be weak, otherwise we can't survive," said Zelenskyy. "We are not selling our country. Look, guys, it's not about business for us. It's just our life. And this is our country, it's our body. So our home, our children. And this is very important for us." "That's why it's painful when President Trump chooses one side, not our side," he continued. "But we are okay that he's in the middle. But if you're in the middle, you have to stay in the middle. Not on the wrong side. I think his advisors are wrong. I don't know who is pushing him not to the right side. This is not the right side of history." Notice how masterfully Zelenskyy phrased his attack. He condemned Trump's actions as a betrayal, shaming him, but then gave the egomaniacal American President a way out by suggesting that his advisors are to blame and that he can still reverse course. The reality, of course, is that this "deal" is fully Trump's responsibility because he's the one sitting behind the Resolute Desk. This betrayal is a result of his incompetence, his self-interested desire to lower gas prices at any cost, and the fact that he is a creature pathologically incapable of loyalty. History will judge him accordingly. Please ❤️ and share if you think that history will vilify Trump and Putin!
90
1,528
48
5,375
136,498
Andrew Jackson retweeted
🚗 Volkswagen factory in Germany vs China Labor cost per hour 🇩🇪 Emden: €74 🇨🇳 Tianjin: €12 Annual working hours per worker 🇩🇪 Emden: 1,282 🇨🇳 Tianjin: 2,065 Sick leave rate 🇩🇪 Emden: 10.5% 🇨🇳 Tianjin: 1.0% Cars built per employee per year 🇩🇪 Emden: 29 🇨🇳 Tianjin: 51.3 Factory cost per vehicle 🇩🇪 Emden: €4,850 🇨🇳 Tianjin: €1,078 Electricity cost per kWh 🇩🇪 Emden: €0.15–0.23 🇨🇳 Tianjin: €0.06–0.10 Source: BILD, Deutsche Welle (September 2026)
416
3,068
453
20,212
1,589,378
Andrew Jackson retweeted
Robert Palmer- Addicted To Love❤️❤️ In Memoriam 🤍🫶🤍🕊
24
185
20
1,159
31,398
Andrew Jackson retweeted
I've been thinking, ever since Burnham became PM, that this would be the route he'd choose. Which was cemented recently by the strong receipts we had from CGT over the last tax year. I think O'Neill is right, and it's worth spelling out why this option "looms." It isn't because it's good policy, it's because it's the last door they haven't nailed shut themselves. They can't reform welfare, because there will be a backbench rebellion. They won't touch the triple lock, because the electoral arithmetic makes it difficult. They ruled out the three big taxes in the manifesto, which are the only ones that can really move the needle on yet another "black hole." So the path of least resistance takes them, almost mechanically, to capital gains. Because it's the biggest option left, and they'll say there's a moral case underpinning their decision, which they'll attempt to sell hard to the public. But take a look at the economy they'd be doing this to. Britain has sat at or near the bottom of the G7 for business investment for most of the last 30 years. We are a country desperately short of exactly the things capital gains tax falls on. Risk taking, business formation, people backing an idea with their own money and their own years. And those strong receipts we saw recently? CGT brought in around £22bn last year, up 62%, and still only around 2% of total receipts. But look at why… disposals pulled forward ahead of rate rises, allowance cuts, and reliefs being wound down. Landlords selling before the Renters' Rights Act. Owners selling before BADR rates went up. This isn’t a stable tax base that suggests bumper tax receipts in the future, it’s people getting out of investments now before they get hammered. CGT is the most behaviourally sensitive tax we have, because if you equalise it with income tax, people don't queue up to pay 45% on years or decades of risk. They'll defer the sale, they'll restructure, or they'll leave. My prediction, if they raise CGT, is that the revenue received will severely underperform, but the real damage will be the signal they put out there… this is not a country that rewards effort and risk-taking. And that's the real cost… the founder who doesn't start, the investor who allocates elsewhere, and the quiet mental recalibration of what trying is actually worth in this country. As Laffer puts it, if you tax something, you get less of it. Tax investment heavily and you'll get less investment. In my view, this is one of the most dangerous paths the government could take when it comes to taxation. Sadly, it's the one I think they'll take. If this is what happens in the next budget, Burnham will need to be pushed hard on what the vision for this country is. Because if you tax investment punitively, you've got to wonder what the future here looks like. So what’s the vision? What’s the payoff? What amazing change will this deliver the country? Because right now, to me, it looks like Labour keep painting themselves into a corner where the only solution they have is major tax hikes every budget. To say I'm concerned would be a massive understatement.
33
85
11
429
94,515
Andrew Jackson retweeted
The Fair Tax Foundation's own boss called this Groundhog Day, the exact same royalty fee trick that caused a public boycott and a parliamentary grilling back in 2012 is still turning a profitable UK business into an accounting loss today.
Starbucks paid zero tax in 2025 on sales of £556.3m. They got a £13.7m tax credit instead. What's the benefit of having Starbucks in the UK? Either tax them on their sales or give the sites to independent British cafes instead. Stop letting foreign multinationals plunder our country.
9
106
5
133
3,044
Andrew Jackson retweeted
Starbucks paid zero tax in 2025 on sales of £556.3m. They got a £13.7m tax credit instead. What's the benefit of having Starbucks in the UK? Either tax them on their sales or give the sites to independent British cafes instead. Stop letting foreign multinationals plunder our country.
469
2,283
157
6,273
140,730
Andrew Jackson retweeted
In the 24 months since Labour came to power, we've seen; • Employer National Insurance increased from 13.8% to 15%. • The employer NI threshold cut from £9,100 to £5,000. • Income Tax and National Insurance thresholds frozen until 2031. • Capital Gains Tax increased from 10% and 20% to 18% and 24%. • Business Asset Disposal Relief increased from 10% to 14%, then 18%. • Investors’ Relief increased and its lifetime allowance cut from £10 million to £1 million. • Carried interest taxation increased and moved towards the Income Tax regime. • Dividend tax rates increased by two percentage points. • Savings-income tax rates increased by two percentage points. • Property-income tax rates increased by two percentage points. • Most unused pension funds brought into the Inheritance Tax net. • Agricultural Property Relief restricted. • Business Property Relief restricted. • Inheritance Tax thresholds frozen for longer. • The non-dom regime replaced with a more extensive residence-based system. • VAT imposed on private school fees. • Business-rates relief removed from private schools. • Stamp Duty increased on second homes and buy-to-let properties. • The Furnished Holiday Lettings tax regime abolished. • Pension salary-sacrifice benefits capped at £2,000 before National Insurance applies. • The Cash ISA allowance cut to £12,000 for most under-65s. • A 22% charge introduced on interest from cash held inside non-cash ISAs. • Restrictions introduced on transfers and cash-like holdings within ISAs. • The Energy Profits Levy increased and extended. • Investment allowances for oil and gas producers reduced. • A new Vaping Products Duty introduced. • Tobacco duties increased above inflation. • Vehicle Excise Duty increased for many new cars. • Electric vehicles brought into the Vehicle Excise Duty system. • A new mileage tax announced for electric and plug-in hybrid cars. • Air Passenger Duty increased. • Climate Change Levy rates increased. • Plastic Packaging Tax increased. • A new Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism introduced. • Making Tax Digital extended to more landlords and self-employed people. Together they represent one of the biggest transfers of wealth from households and businesses to the Treasury in decades - with no noticeable improvement in public services. Whether you're a business owner employing staff, a parent paying school fees, a farmer planning succession, an entrepreneur building wealth or simply someone trying to save for retirement... You keep less of what you earn. You keep less of what you invest. You leave less to your family. Death by a thousand cuts is becoming tax policy.
768
4,980
594
12,962
947,868
Andrew Jackson retweeted
Clarkson's Farm streams in over 240 countries. The strongest demand outside Britain is American, running roughly twelve times the average US series, and the first episode took over five million views on Bilibili in China. A programme about one man losing money in a field in Oxfordshire, watched on four continents. The Dutch were first. On 1 October 2019 thousands of farmers drove tractors to The Hague over a proposal to halve the national livestock herd on nitrogen grounds. A thousand kilometres of traffic jams, the busiest morning rush hour in Dutch history. Within a month they had founded a political party, and four years later the BoerBurgerBeweging came first in all twelve provinces. Germany, January 2024. Tractors in nearly all sixteen federal states over diesel tax. France, roads and supermarkets blocked, and tractors back in Paris again this January. Poland, Belgium, Spain, Ireland. The European Commission pulled its plan to halve pesticide use, directly because of the unrest. Greece has been going since December. Highways, border crossings, ports and airports, over frozen subsidies and livestock disease. India produced the largest protest in human history by most measures. Farmers built a settlement outside Delhi with kitchens, schools and its own newspaper, sat in it for over a year, and the government repealed all three farm laws. America has lost 142,000 farms in five years and its average farmer is pushing sixty. Britain got 13,000 farmers and a thousand tractors in Westminster, and told itself it was arguing about one chancellor's budget. Different countries. Different governments, left and right. Different grievances on paper: nitrogen, diesel, subsidies, pesticides, inheritance tax, minimum prices. One complaint underneath the lot. The people who produce the food are the only ones in the chain who cannot set a price, cannot pass on a cost, and are told by everybody else what they may do with their own land. Which is why a Missouri rancher, a Dutch dairyman and a farmer in Punjab can watch a man in the Cotswolds fail to clear £144 and recognise their own books. The problem was always global. Clarkson just put subtitles on it.
48
1,025
30
3,771
46,771
Andrew Jackson retweeted
Ridiculous. And then a whole new level of ridiculous. 0.1% over on moisture. £8.19 a tonne to dry it, and 3.8% of the weight taken off. This in a year where millions of tonnes have been harvested, well below 15% If you ever wanted evidence of how one sided this supply chain is, here it is. 🫤 #BritishFarming #UKFarming
15
25
1
134
17,886
Andrew Jackson retweeted
It’s probably worth saying at this point something I’ve said before, lest it gets lost in the sands of time and political rhetoric about immigration and illegal entry, and how we got to this point. I was an immigration officer in the 1970s and 1980s. The power to grant or refuse leave to enter was vested to me in law under the authority of a Chief Immigration Officer. Anyone arriving without a valid passport (and a visa if required) was refused entry at the border, detained, and removed on the next available ship or aircraft whence they came. This was under the Immigration Act 1971 (still In force although amended massively by successive governments ever since). It was some 20 - 30 years after the 1951 ECHR and the 1951 Refugee Convention was signed. Nobody claimed asylum. Nobody claimed human rights. No country refused to take people back. Those who had destroyed their passports were removed on a letter, signed by me. Fast forward 50 years and now anyone who arrives at the border without a passport or a visa automatically claims asylum or human rights. Immigration Officers of today (or Border Force Officers) are thereby disempowered to send them back before their asylum claims or human rights claims are considered. And their appeals are dismissed. They cannot be detained in the meantime because under the Hardial Singh principles immigration detention is only lawful if there is a realistic prospect of removal within a reasonable period of time. Which there isn’t of course. So the only option available to the officer is to grant temporary permission whilst these applications are considered. And if the applicant claims to be destitute they must be given support and accommodation at public expense. Because failure to do so would put the government in breach of A3 of the ECHR (inhuman and degrading treatment). And even if the applicant is eventually refused protection - and loses their appeal - we need to get a passport to remove them on. And they often refuse to comply with the documentation process. Even if they do many countries still refuse to issue them with a passport and refuse to take them back. And even after all this they can abscond and if ever caught start the whole process again. This is where we are and so far no government has been able to break the Gordian knot that ties the hands of our officers. In order to do that they would have to reverse decades of laws and judgements - and demur from long held well intentioned international conventions. And probably look at the British Constitution itself to curtail the opportunity of political opponents to use the courts to thwart the will of Parliament. This is not to criticise or favour any political party or policy. It is simply a matter of record to inform the next generation of politicians and the civil servants charged with the duty of implementing any new laws or policies they may introduce. And to ask why - if we did it back in my day - why can’t we do it now? I even wrote a book about it. I hope someone keeps a copy for posterity - or even history - when thinking about how to fix this seemingly intractable problem. amzn.eu/d/06wM4s2h
🚨 NEW: Andy Burnham has pledged to "eradicate" small boat crossings "We will keep going at this issue until we deliver that eradication that people are looking for. We will now change our tactics and we will be relentless"
132
1,425
100
4,963
375,854
Andrew Jackson retweeted
Jeremy Clarkson runs at least eight businesses off a thousand acres in Oxfordshire. Seven of them make money. Count them. A farm shop. A pub. A lager brand. A bestselling book every autumn. A streaming series. A merchandise range. And now an app, built by Lisa Hogan, connecting the public to farms. Then the eighth. Growing food. Year one, working the ground flat out: £144. By year six, a £5,000 loss where £37,000 had been projected. This summer, two hundred of those acres grew nothing at all, because putting wheat in them was a guaranteed loss before the drill left the shed. Every enterprise on that farm turns a profit except the farming. The lager tells you why, and the chain of cause is on the record. Government subsidies were falling, so in 2021 he decided to brew beer from his own barley. That is the entire origin of Hawkstone. A decision taken in Whitehall turned an arable farmer into a brewer, and the beer worked. Nothing about the grain changed. Barley sold as barley goes at whatever the buyer offers that morning. Barley in a bottle goes at the price the man who grew it decides. That one difference is the whole business. The pub is the same move in bricks. A derelict barn nobody had wanted since 2013, bought for reportedly under a million, now with a queue. On the menu a sausage from his own pigs costs 74p against 18p for the imported version, and he absorbs that gap on every plate. The farm shop, meanwhile, is legally barred from selling food produced more than sixteen miles away, and still cannot keep up with demand. Now look at what the farming has behind it that yours does not. One of the best land agents in England. A farm manager who has worked that ground since he was a teenager. An agronomist. A production company covering the costs. A queue down the lane. A name that sells anything it is printed on. It loses money anyway. And this is the ordinary arrangement, not an eccentric one. Defra's own figures say 72 percent of farms in England now take income from something that is not farming, and diversification accounts for 31 percent of total farm income. The government's own Batters Review found nearly a third of British farms were loss-making outright in 2024. Diddly Squat is simply the loudest version. The shop subsidises the field. The pub subsidises the field. The television subsidises the field. A thousand acres of English farmland, and the one thing it cannot do is pay for itself by producing food.
118
1,439
46
6,462
339,227
Andrew Jackson retweeted
Replying to @10DowningStreet
@10DowningStreet Answers on a post card, but then I’m guessing your view is they won’t cost the uk taxpayer money or vote for @UKLabour so what’s the point. Am I correct?
Excuse me? We can’t bring in 70 sheep shearers but washing a car and selling vapes is a skilled job worthy of a sponsor? Paging @NFUtweets @NFUCymru
1
135
Andrew Jackson retweeted
When it comes to tax in the UK, a lot of people are deluding themselves, thinking the government will just go after the wealthy to pay for the ballooning commitments they’ve made. The truth is, the real target is the middle class. And the reason is simple. The middle class is the only viable option for the kind of revenue the government wants. Start with who’s off the table. A third of British adults pay no income tax at all. The bottom half of earners take home about a quarter of the income in this country and pay roughly a tenth of the tax. There’s no pot of gold buried down there, and every party has spent years promising to protect “working people.” Squeezing them is politically radioactive and would raise next to nothing anyway. The rich are off the table too, whatever the Channel 4 documentaries say. The top 1% already pay 28% of all income tax. Their money is capital, dividends and gains, so they’re mobile, and they’ve already started leaving. One widely quoted forecast has Britain losing half a million millionaires by 2028. Push the rate on these people much higher and you collect less, not more. Threatening them polls brilliantly, but relying on them for a tax bonanza is pure fantasy. Which leaves the middle class, and the middle class can’t run. Most are on PAYE, taxed at source before the money touches their account. They can’t turn a salary into a capital gain. They can’t declare residency in Monaco, because the job, the kids’ school and the mortgage are all here. Their wealth is a house they can’t hide under the mattress and a pension they can’t reach. Numerous, visible and immobile. The perfect target, and in some ways the only one. And here’s how it’s already being done. They won’t raise your headline rate of income tax, because they promised not to. But the threshold freeze, the one that sounds like a non-event on Budget day, is quietly hammering you, and it’s now been extended to 2031. Took out a student loan since 2012? You’ve been paying the graduate tax in all but name. Hold investments outside an ISA? You’ve watched CGT climb to 24%, and it’s likely to be equalised with income tax next. Sent your kids to private school? That’s the VAT charge. Saving into a cash ISA? That shelter just shrank from £20,000 to £12,000. And from 2027, your pension gets pulled into inheritance tax, so the pot you spent a career building can be taxed again on the way out. There’s more coming. Mansion taxes, higher CGT, property levies, dividends. Most of the taxes we’re told will hit the ultra wealthy will actually land on the middle class. And in most cases they’re not sat on fortunes, they’re sat on assets they spent a working life building. What’s worse, the burden grows with every Budget, because of the compounding commitments this government keeps making, and that nearly every other party has pledged too. So who pays for the past, present and future spending of the UK government? The middle class. And there’s not a thing they can do about it. Debt-trapped, stuck in place, with nowhere to turn, and the government knows it. If any of this resonated, you’re likely in the taxation crosshairs. I wish you luck.
141
615
54
2,348
171,820