
@abachurini
iAccount based inPortugal
About this account
- Account based in
- Portugal
- Connected via
- Portugal App Store
Account-level information from X, not a live location or the device used for a specific post.
Algarve, Portugal
Joined December 2011
- Tweets10.5K
- Following317
- Followers240
- Likes678
Replying to @Grimeandreason @ma_varon_col
What “proletariat”? You mean 12% of China population engaged in factory work? They don’t control anything whatsoever. China is run by bureaucracy since Confucius.
Most of China economy is private enterprise, including all frontier AI companies.
You are just wrong about Fascism. Capital does not control anything there! The State has ultimate control. Not capitalist, not proletariat, not farmers. The State, personified by a Leader.
Private enterprise and reasonable competition is much better for economic growth. But had to be tightly controlled. This is “Fascism”, not “Socialism”.
Btw, there is no “capital” in Socialism. Means of production belong to the State. Some exceptions can be made for agricultural communes or buildings cooperatives but any significant enterprise - 100% belongs to the State.
So there is no Capital to “subjugate” by proletariat or anyone else under Socialism.
This is so irrational. Many people have too many mirror neurons, they are obsessed with some person they never knew dying in highly publicized manner. “So tragic! He could have lived!”.
Well no, he would have died anyway, just a bit later.
If you live in big city like London, about 500 people there die every day. You are going to die, your children as well (most likely). Humans die. This can be viewed as a “tragedy”, but Socrates had much better viewpoint.
Theorem
P \ne NP.
Proof
The expression P consists of exactly one letter.
The expression NP consists of two letters, namely N and P.
Objects containing different numbers of letters cannot be equal. Therefore,
P \ne NP.
This proof is clearly polynomial in length and can be verified instantly.
/done with ChatGPT 5.6/
Nolan is a genius. The movie has strong Conservative message, nothing woke or progressive about it.
All controversial casting choices are perfect, all serve clear purpose.
Take Elliot Page. Their character has a job to deceive Troyans by telling what the character himself honestly believes, but which is in fact a lie! )
I did a grave mistake. Commented on several blue/red button posts. Now all i see is discussion of this thing.
Alex Bachurin retweeted
Epistemic status: salivating arxiv.org/abs/2602.04022
Alex Bachurin retweeted
План правительства России по выходу из ситуации с арестами имущества в Европе:
1. отрицание
2. гнев
3. торг
4. депрессия
5. принятие
Alex Bachurin retweeted
Sepp Blatter on the phone. Says he's resigning as FIFA President to "spend more time with the family, and his shredder".
Alex Bachurin retweeted
"Я нашла поблизости несколько компаний занимающихся перевозками домашних вещей" xitter.cf/moskless/status/594765…
Alex Bachurin retweeted
Nothing special. Just a bear drinking beer, couple getting married and a random guy surrounded by white snow.
Alex Bachurin retweeted
Authoritarians draw the wrong lessons from Lee Kuan Yew's success econ.st/1xrPt4V
Alex Bachurin retweeted
Replying to @Kasparov63
@Kasparov63 @gomezjunco "Why would the cat eat the canary? He knows it would make him look bad! It was probably the fish or the hamster!"
Alex Bachurin retweeted
В программе Время первая новость сосульки в Новосибирске, вторая - бродячие собаки в Чите. Когда такое еще было?
Alex Bachurin retweeted
Алексей Цветков о западном и российском отношении к государству
gazeta.ru/comments/2015/03/0…




















