Carlos Bederian

El ministro @fedesturze contando cómo usan agentes de IA para reformular las regulaciones. Cuenta que cambiaron regulación de frigoríficos así: "Le dimos el monstruo de 3000 artículos a 3 agentes y los 3 independientemente tenían que analizar artículo por artículo y hacer una recomendación. Otro agente miraba lo que hacía EE.UU. y Europa. Los cuatro agentes se juntaban y votaban. Si había unanimidad se pone como 'vamos a hacer este cambio' y, si no se ponían de acuerdo, traíamos a otros 3 agentes y después decidían por mayoría de los siete. Esto que nos hubiera llevado meses de trabajo, en un día tenés los 3000 artículos [analizados] con la sugerencia, la [nueva] redacción y después el humano lo que tiene que hacer es (hacer como) la validación"

WE ARE YOUR 2026 SUMMER LCS CHAMPIONS AND 1ST SEED FOR WORLDS

I’ve recently been worried about brain drain for a very selfish reason. A lot of my friends have been leaving (you know who you are). I couldn’t tell if my concern was bad reasoning from anecdotes so I tracked one group of exceptional Britons you can actually follow individually: International Mathematical Olympiad medallists. These are not normal teenagers. ~3% of IMO winners go on to win major scientific prizes (60x the rate of MIT alumni). The UK's medallists include two Fields Medallists, the designer of the chip in 99% of the world's smartphones, and the inventors of public-key cryptography. The headline number says I am wrong to worry: 71% retention and the UK is the second-largest importer of IMO talent globally after the US. But look closer and you see: 1. The most recent settled-career cohort shows the lowest retention on record. 2. Before 2016, not a single UK medallist did their undergrad abroad. Since then, two have. Both went to MIT. 3. Of British medallists in industry, only 33% work for a British firm. The modal employer is Anthropic, OpenAI, or Jane Street. 4. Leaving is individually rational. IMO alumni who moved to the US were up to 6x more productive than equally talented peers who stayed home. The UK multiplier is 2-3x. The individual-optimal and nationally-optimal choice are not the same thing. So was I right to worry? Too early to say. The data is consistent with both a structural shift and noise. But the laments of brain drain are not obviously wrong. Full piece: substack.com/@britishprogres… (A note on statistical validity: we send six kids to the IMO a year, so some of these figures rest on analysing small numbers. This is enough to see the shape of things but not enough to lean hard on any percentage.)

🤯 This is scary good for something rendering in real time. Selfie-based liveness checks ask for a fixed set of motions: head turn, blink, close approach to the camera. This demo nails all of them, including the part that usually breaks for synthetic faces (skin micro-texture and forehead wrinkles holding up at close range). Without the side-by-side at the bottom, you wouldn't know it's not Will Smith. Source: Incognia