You're using the same strategy as Fuentes, whose audience you're specifically trying to appeal to: take every position so when somebody points out you said something counterproductive you can produce a tweet that says otherwise, then complain that people don't listen to your hours of weekly content to understand what you really mean. I stopped bothering listening to you early in Trump's second term because you continually undermined him and Vance. The people who've delivered us previously unthinkable political wins and done the most to actually forward our our ideas. Supporting "based" candidates is useless if you perpetually undermine the people actually doing good. And for what it's worth, if I lived in Florida I would have voted for Fishback because he's better than the alternatives, but he lost and has no ability to make any sort of change, and now he's attacking the people actually doing good work. It's a fact that we're in the best political position we've been in in our lives, yet somehow people in our circle have become increasingly demoralized—and to be frank, deranged—because they have people like you in their ear talling them that none of it's good enough. I care about the random anon, and it's clear that the fruit of the things you've been telling them isn't good. Just look in your replies at the kind of responses you get: nihilistic doomerism. I'm sure you'll use the "But I'm not responsible for what the people in my replies are saying!" line. But people on the right are supposed to have a better understanding of human nature. We're supposed to understand that people aren't rational actors and follow leaders. You may try to deny it, but it's apparent that what many people are getting from you is demoralization. Sorry, but I think it's a bad thing that my friends are being driven to despondency by demoralizing meme politics when we're finally making progress!