I retweet content I think is important. 😊

...
Joined May 2014
Idea? to increase stability of landing, a bunch of Quadcopters could latch on to falcon mid air and gently bring it down.
1
v̴̝̐i̖̍x̘̍t̵̙̖̆̅ retweeted
UltraBERT is here (along with super interesting lessons learned from training it)! 152M + 380M encoders, 32K context, built for classification, NER, QA, reward modeling + retrieval. Most interesting part is the training recipe: -5% masking for classification -50% masking for retrieval -Separate LM head for each -Distillation only on the 5% sequences Distillation findings are also really insightful. They trained a 1.3B teacher, pruned it by width to 380M and 150M, and distilled both smaller models from the teacher. But they only applied logit distillation to the 5% masked sequences. Some other interesting training lessons: -Encoder performance saturated early, even as loss kept falling -Multi-stage data mixtures had little effect after fine-tuning -32K context added during only the final 100B of 2T training tokens -Distillation not automatically useful across every capability Strong size-to-performance tradeoff too: -380M leads the authors’ comparison on GLUE + BEIR -150M matches RoBERTa-large on classification at 2.3x smaller -~8 point lead on code + math retrieval -99%+ Passkey recall through 32K Great open source release! Long live BERT ✌️ @huggingface weights: huggingface.co/collections/d… Paper: arxiv.org/pdf/2610.15028v1
13
89
6
620
21,615
I am reading and learning the RL book (Prof @RichardSSutton ), and thought I should make a site suttons-rl-lab.rdm-8.chatgpt… .
3
98
v̴̝̐i̖̍x̘̍t̵̙̖̆̅ retweeted
I’m very excited to share @nvidia Kumo Tabular, a new family of foundation models for tabular data. Kumo Tabular establishes the new Pareto frontier across the entire accuracy–inference-time tradeoff. Just as importantly, we are releasing it openly: open weights, open-source software, and a permissive license for commercial use. HuggingFace: huggingface.co/nvidia/Kumo-T… GitHub: github.com/NVIDIA/structured…
32
155
34
1,103
128,031
v̴̝̐i̖̍x̘̍t̵̙̖̆̅ retweeted
New historic NanoGPT record at 39.9s (-27.7s) from @DevenPzak , obliterating the prior record of 67.6s! This record introduces a new paradigm of thinking to NanoGPT: instead of optimizing matmuls or adding more expressive operations, optimize at the individual flop level with incredibly clever engineering and ML judgement. If a flop is low value on a particular step, skip it. Specifically: -(~8s) Sampled softmax. If a token doesn’t appear in a batch, skip its lm_head fwd/bwd some fraction of the time. -Sparse values. Only run an optimizer step for ngram embeddings that occurred in the batch. Set beta1 to zero to enable this. Beta2 is applied retroactively when the row is later used. -Sparse updates. Only update ngram and value embeddings once every 4 steps instead of once every 2. -Sparse communication. Shard the n-gram table across GPUs, and only pass the rows receiving updates on each step. -Sparse optimizer states. For the n-gram table, reduce from 2 floats in Adam optimizer per param, to 1 float per 768 params. -Hand-rolled flash attention for 64 dim heads. There are several additions that add accuracy too: -(~4s) EMA during last 300 steps, combined with lifting final_lr to 0.3 instead of 0.15. -(~1s) A new optimizer, Anvil2, which expands muon via a second tracked momentum buffer, improves the ortho coefficients, and modifies the cautious weight decay application. -A couple additional dynamic skip connections in the network. The most striking consequence of the ‘flop aware paradigm’ is you can grow parameters arbitrarily large, only limited by the available memory, since you can selectively choose how to expend flops on those parameters on each step. NanoGPT has kept active parameters below 124M, but total is unbounded, and has grown to 640M through embedding sparsity over the last year. This PR takes that to its logical conclusion on the 8xH100, scaling up to 65B sparse embedding parameters, which accounts for 25% of the PR’s gains. At frontier scale, where one is not bounded by an 8xH100, one could imagine where this paradigm could lead. github.com/KellerJordan/modd… As this was a very notable PR, I spoke with Deven for an hour to learn how he did it. Here’s his story on the changes: hyperstition.cc/training-nan…
37
156
67
1,479
425,991
v̴̝̐i̖̍x̘̍t̵̙̖̆̅ retweeted
Small data + open-source models are outperforming the frontier on specialized tasks We’ve been experimenting with online task synthesis to train small models for our customers and the results are kinda crazy With only 300-500 calibrated, synthetic tasks, you can make a 4B model act like a 400B
22
36
4
312
16,367
v̴̝̐i̖̍x̘̍t̵̙̖̆̅ retweeted
Max Greenfield - one of the greatest satire on tv youtu.be/AVNmUgOGTPY
GPT-6 Astra is definitely a different beast of a model. gives me vibes like a brilliant scientist and yet monk like calmness. #GPT6Astra
1
1
37
v̴̝̐i̖̍x̘̍t̵̙̖̆̅ retweeted
We've shared research on fine-tuning forecasters, now you can try it for yourself: a cookbook recipe for training a model to predict event probabilities given reference information. Start with the provided dataset from @ProphetArena, then try your own. github.com/thinking-machines…
4
30
8
388
52,056
XGBoost stands for “Extreme Gradient Boosting”, where the term “Gradient Boosting” xgboost.readthedocs.io/en/st…
20
v̴̝̐i̖̍x̘̍t̵̙̖̆̅ retweeted
How much would it cost you to pretrain a 2B LLM from scratch? $1M? $100K? 🚀Announcing Puro-2B, with a fully open recipe. You can train a model that matches Qwen2-1.5B on RTX 5090s for less than $5090! $4.4K → beats Qwen2-1.5B $6.9K → approaches Qwen2.5-1.5B Check here👇
37
141
23
1,528
120,679
v̴̝̐i̖̍x̘̍t̵̙̖̆̅ retweeted
LLMs with scaffolds have lagged on text-to-SQL, a task that relies on human judgment. By folding expert judgment into every part of RLVR on Tinker, @maxYuxuanZhu and @ddkang (UIUC and Bridgwater) trained the first text-to-SQL model to beat the human mark. thinkingmachines.ai/news/put…
4
47
12
364
220,587
v̴̝̐i̖̍x̘̍t̵̙̖̆̅ retweeted
Here recommand a very solid numerical instability analysis of Marin community! I've encoutered similar grad/logits instabilities in our model training. Though the final loss seems stable, but the max_logits and grad_norm are really horrible, and led to bad performance in downstream tasks. In our model, we use RMSNorm on all Q/K heads, not pre head norm, which was detected as the core arch problem. Though there other components such as self-DD and VQ also show their instability, but we did ablation experiments, the logits and grad norm instability still exists without them. It's an interesting experience and taught me how to monitor and analysis the real training process. Here I have some conclusions in: 1. A healthy global norm can hide a failed head. 2. Track distributions, not only maxima. 3. The normalization axis is part of the architecture and matter a lot. 4. Use ablation to test necessity and locate problem. wandb.ai/marin-community/mar…
1
3
54
5,216
v̴̝̐i̖̍x̘̍t̵̙̖̆̅ retweeted
🎙️Full tech report on how to actually achieve SovereignAI, from data to model training, values, infrastructure, to large-scale deep research. Bridging up to 7 months of Frontier AI development with a $450k training Continual Learning run 🧠 📜 Paper: tinyurl.com/yk347xb 💻Model: tinyurl.com/2ju6z7dc Partners: @imperialcollege, @datologyai, @LambdaAPI
14
31
6
151
718,596
v̴̝̐i̖̍x̘̍t̵̙̖̆̅ retweeted
Look at our data composition: storage.googleapis.com/marin… Watch the run live on wandb: wandb.ai/marin-community/mar… See all the gory details on GitHub: github.com/marin-community/m… Assembling this hero run really required data, architecture, infra, kernels to all come together and was a huge joint effort by the entire Marin team!
7
51
14
657
92,758
v̴̝̐i̖̍x̘̍t̵̙̖̆̅ retweeted
"LittleLearner: Language Models Under Pedagogically Controlled Knowledge Exposure" What happens if you train an LLM that has only ever seen elementary school knowledge? This paper trains a 5B model from scratch on 88B tokens filtered to K-5 content, creating an explicit boundary around what the model was exposed to during pretraining. Scaling, few-shot prompting, and even SFT + GRPO improve capabilities within that boundary, but do little for genuinely out-of-scope reasoning. This gave insights on how pretraining exposure may set a much harder capability ceiling than we think, with post-training mostly amplifying what the model already learned rather than creating entirely new capabilities. alphaxiv.org/abs/2608.13545
12
36
6
316
107,003
v̴̝̐i̖̍x̘̍t̵̙̖̆̅ retweeted
"Matryoshka Language Model Suites" Instead of training every model size separately, this paper nests 500M, 1.5B, and 3B models inside one architecture and trains them together. The smaller models are standalone checkpoints, get near-free distillation from the largest model, and share weights + KV cache for speculative decoding. And you still get the same performance, with 36% less training compute, and 14-26% faster speculative decoding. So a model family can become one jointly trained system instead of several independent models. alphaxiv.org/abs/2608.09703
4
52
5
396
32,895
v̴̝̐i̖̍x̘̍t̵̙̖̆̅ retweeted
What if a foundation model could tell us how to modify its architecture to boost inference and reasoning instantaneously—without retraining? What if that tweak incurred near zero latency cost during generation and supported indefinite state tracking? arxiv.org/abs/2608.17981
22
100
23
538
132,647