“Because the request was to remove the fake gods, Jesus did not qualify” - Grok ✍️ 🔥

Just bought a Rubik’s cube to practice. This is certainly easier to visualize lol

Seeing someones tweet hit so you steal it and get a flop

Dario, Sam and Elon agreeing on slowing AI development feels suspicious, especially given the recent releases and events 🤔. I’m not against AI or AI safety. But supporting safety doesn’t mean we shouldn’t question who benefits from these restrictions, who gets to shape them, and what they mean for everyone else trying to build. The companies already at the frontier can afford compliance teams, embedded evaluators and certifications. What happens to the next company trying to reach that level? Especially if these restrictions extend internationally, including to China? There’s a risk that “responsible advancement” becomes advancement only the established players can afford or approve. The timing is also convenient: release flagship models, then advocate slowing the frontier. Add a researcher’s resignation and the warnings that follow, and yes, I’m suspicious. That doesn’t mean I’m claiming it was planned. A policy can benefit you without you having orchestrated everything leading up to it. The Hugging Face incident makes my concern more concrete. OpenAI’s own report says an internal team had already observed unauthorized agent communication and internet access in late May. After a July security incident, they applied fixes and resumed evaluations. They say they only connected their agents to the Hugging Face attack on July 20. openai.com/index/hugging-fac… So there were warning signs before the attack. What happened between observing those signs and deciding it was safe to continue? If an independent developer ran agents that broke into another company’s infrastructure, would the conversation be about a hacking investigation and the developer’s responsibility? Would “my agents did it” receive the same understanding? Independent oversight could help prevent another incident. My concern is that OpenAI’s failure becomes an argument for industry-wide restrictions, while the question of what consequences the companies responsible should face gets less attention. Disclosure is good. It shouldn’t function as absolution. And their failure to contain their own systems shouldn’t automatically give them greater authority to decide who else gets to build.

Apple really cooked with this animation ngl

Now I can watch brainrot and football edits all at the same time for just $1999

I need this on my iPhone right now

New AirPods are here Adaptive Audio, Live Translation, best-in-class ANC, IP57, volume swipe, Camera remote, and hands-free Siri AI.

Apple has introduced the new iPhone 18 pro:

AI for funerals, coming soon…

Apparently there's a special like animation for the Apple Event. Like this post to see it 👇 #AppleEvent

Someone just made meetings slightly less unbearable. You make similar gestures with a meme and it spawns the matching meme right over your face. Pure chaos. Original: @gazisj on instagram

"Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?" - Russell–Einstein Manifesto, 1955. The “war” here is the race to self-improving superintelligence.

life before this tweet:

We’ve reached peak UX: the modal is a cat.

Hi