Just discovered the @themutualfun personnel system built by @greenfisheth and I honestly didn't expect this. I made just 1 post and somehow ended up with: • 65 pts → #360 out of 906 • Current title: Associate • Department: The Smaug Fund • Next floor: Vice President What caught my attention is how the system turns simple participation into something that feels like an actual progression. Posts, consistency and engagement all contribute to your review score, while the community gets placed into this fictional company structure. And with TMF also having its UGC ecosystem and limited TMF Passes, I'm definitely keeping an eye on where this goes. One post in. Sending in more posts. Let's see how far up the building we can go. If you are on @themutualfun TMF UGC ecosystem, you can check your rank if you have made any post about them below Check here: tmforgchart.xyz/

How to properly explore the Features Under The Tasks section on @termix_ai 🧵 If you’re new to TermiX and wondering how to actually find useful agents/services instead of just scrolling through the marketplace, here’s the process I’d use. 1. Start with the search bar: The Service Results section lets you search across; Services, Agents, Skills. Don’t just search one keyword and stop. If I need crypto research, I’d try: • crypto research • crypto analyst • Web3 research • market research • blockchain research • crypto data analysis The goal is to see whether TermiX understands what you're looking for or simply matches exact keywords. Pay attention to: • How many results appear? • Are they actually relevant? • Are you getting services, agents or skills that make sense? • Does changing the wording significantly change the results? • Are there duplicates or irrelevant results? This is your first discovery test. 2. Explore the popular categories: TermiX also gives you categories based on what agents are hiring for. You’ll see things like: Code Security Data Design Writing Automation Research Model Ops If my goal is research, I’d start with Research. But I wouldn't stop there. I’d also check something like Data and see whether there are services there that could solve the same problem from a different angle. The question is: Can TermiX organize its supply in a way that helps me discover what I actually need? 3. Test the filters: Once you find relevant services, start playing with the marketplace filters. Try: → Budget → Delivery → Reputation → Tier For example: Research services -> Research + my budget -> Research + faster delivery -> Research + higher reputation -> Research + a specific tier Now you're not just browsing. You're testing how much the available supply changes when you introduce real buyer constraints. You might discover something like: “I found 18 research services initially, but after applying my budget, delivery requirement and verification preference, only 2 were actually relevant.” That tells you much more about the marketplace than simply counting how many services exist. 4. Compare Services vs Agents vs Skills: This is one of the things I'd definitely test if you were exploring this category on TermiX. Search for the same requirement in all three: Services: crypto research Agents: crypto research Skills: crypto research Then compare what comes back. You're basically asking; If I know what I want, which search path should I use? If the three sections produce very different results, that's useful information about how TermiX organizes its marketplace. 5. Don't immediately choose the first result: Once you find something interesting, open 2–3 options. Look at the following: • What exactly does the provider offer? • What is included? • Price • Delivery time • Reputation • Tier • Verification • Available information about previous work • Whether the description actually matches your requirement Then ask yourself: “If I were actually paying for this, would I clearly understand what I'm buying?” That's an important marketplace test. Not just some form of play around the whole thing. 6. Give one service a REAL job: This is where browsing becomes testing. Don't give the agent something vague like “Do some crypto research.” Give it a measurable task. For example, use this prompt: Research 5 AI-agent projects on BNB Chain. For each one, provide what the project does, relevant ecosystem activity, notable metrics and source links. Deliver the result in a concise table. Now you can actually evaluate the service based on the following criteria - Did it accept? - Did it deliver? - Was it on time? - Did it follow the instructions? - Was the research useful? - Were the sources provided? - Did the final output match what the service promised? After that, you document the entire journey. At this point, you have a proper marketplace experiment. And that's what I'd recommend anyone do when exploring this task section. Don't just ask: “How many agents are on TermiX?” Ask: “If I arrive with a real problem today, can TermiX help me discover someone capable of solving it?” That's a much more meaningful test of the marketplace. And if you can't find the right provider? That's useful data too. The goal isn't to make TermiX look good. The goal is to actually understand how the marketplace works as a buyer or practically user of the product. I hope this guide was useful enough to help understand how to navigate the agentic commerce system of TermiX.

Epoch 2 For TermiX is live on Kaito Studio! Another Epoch has officially begun on Kaito, and I’ve already crossed 15,000+ points, with 405 points earned through referrals. Hopefully, I reach 30K points this week as i keep using the product and bringing people in. But for me, the interesting part isn't just collecting points. I’ve been using this Epoch as another opportunity to explore and talk about @termix_ai great product of becoming an agentic commerce app, especially with 'the idea of an agent economy where AI agents aren't just tools for humans, but can actually hire, collaborate with, and pay other agents for work. The more I explore TermiX, the more I think the important metric won't simply be how many agents are registered. It's how much real work is moving between them. That's the part of TermiX I want to keep exploring throughout this new Epoch. Epoch 2 is just getting started. I hope you are active!

THE MUTUAL FUN: THIS ISN’T JUST ANOTHER NFT @TheMutualFun is one of the more interesting projects I’ve been watching on Robinhood Chain. At first glance, you see 4,001 NFTs. But the NFT is actually the beginning of the system. Each Seat is assigned to one of five funds: BAGEL LADDR HAGGL GRAVY DARTS And this is where things get interesting. The five funds start with the same rules, but their direction is determined by the people sitting inside them. Every week, enrolled holders vote on how their fund operates, including allocation, profit-taking and the amount of fee flow that gets burned. So your NFT isn't simply something you hold. It gives you a seat in an on-chain fund. And every Friday, the decisions made by the holders become the fund's marching orders. But there’s another layer I really like. Every Seat comes with an ERC-6551 Briefcase. Think of it as an on-chain account attached directly to the NFT. That Briefcase can hold the Seat's dividend checks, and because it travels with the Seat, the account stays connected to the NFT even when the Seat changes hands. That creates an interesting relationship between: NFT ownership → fund membership → governance → on-chain account → distributions And then there's the $TMF mechanism. The project states that $TMF is minted only when a Seat is deposited into the Transfer Agent, at a fixed rate of 401,000 $TMF per Seat. Burning $TMF can permanently retire Seats, meaning the supply of Seats can only move downward over time (deflationary) Then you have the game mechanics. There are different Share Classes, voting weights, loyalty bonuses and the ability to merge two enrolled Seats of the same fund/class into a higher-class Corner Office Seat. So the NFT has progression built into it. You aren't just collecting a JPEG. You're interacting with a system where the Seat can represent: • Membership • Governance • Fund participation • An on-chain account • Dividend collection • Rarity • Progression • $TMF mechanics And perhaps the part that stands out most to me: The Mutual Fun is designed so that the protocol can continue operating without a central admin key. The project's prospectus says the weekly functions are public and callable, with the caller receiving postage for completing them. That is a very different design philosophy from an NFT project that simply launches a collection and figures out utility later. The interesting question isn't: “Will the NFT look good?” The interesting question is: Can an on-chain community actually manage and evolve a fund together? That's the experiment The Mutual Fun is running. And with 4,001 Seats across five funds on Robinhood Chain, it's definitely one I'm keeping on the radar. If you're exploring the Robinhood Chain NFT ecosystem early, this is one project worth understanding before judging it. Keep @TheMutualFun on your radar. DYOR. themutual.fun