@_StaticVoidi
iAccount based inSweden
About this account
- Account based in
- Sweden
- Connected via
- Sweden App Store
Account-level information from X, not a live location or the device used for a specific post.
Specialist Engineer in 🇸🇪 • 🏆 @GoogleDevExpert • 🏆 @MVPAward •🧠 INTJ-T• ⚛️ I like complicated beep boops
Stockholm, Sweden
Joined August 2009
- Tweets32.8K
- Following739
- Followers10.4K
- Likes17.3K
Pinned Tweet
Hoje eu descobri uma parada interessante, a gente poderia estar codando usando uma máquina de escrever.
Quem usa linux já deve ter visto a palavra TTY no terminal. Mas o que é um TTY?
Lucas Santos 🇧🇷🇸🇪 retweeted
New ad by the Norwegian Consumer Council about the declining lifespan of products.
Lucas Santos 🇧🇷🇸🇪 retweeted
> be anthropic
> say ai might take over internet
> researchers: “it might kill humans.”
> dario: “we need independent evaluators”
> choose metr
> metr gets funded by the same network funding anthropic
> which also funds ai safety orgs
> which also funds doom research
> which also funds policy work
> which also holds major wealth linked to anthropic
> which also funds tarbell
> tarbell pushes doom into time, the verge, science, la times, etc.
> anthropic makes more money
> network gets richer
> more fund goes into ai doom
> ai doom pushes more regulation
> regulation favors “responsible” frontier labs
> anthropic gets more power
> repeat
the doom funds the network → the network amplifies the doom → anthropic benefits from both
I have conducted an audit of Anthropic's finances.
What I have found is so shocking that I am calling for a Congressional investigation.
Anthropic is not just seeking regulatory capture.
It has built a regulatory capture machine that cannot be turned off.
Structural financial incentives make it impossible for Anthropic -- I call it the Anthropic Network -- to turn off its own AI doom cycle.
It starts with METR.
Dario Amodei proposes "third-party evaluators" to assess the risk of Anthropic's models.
He proposes METR for this purpose.
But METR is financially dependent on the Anthropic's success -- specifically, on the explosive growth of more than $7 billion dollars in Anthropic stock.
Dustin Moskovitz invested this stock into Good Ventures Foundation, where it represents the majority of that organization's portfolio.
And GVF is the overwhelming funder of the entire Anthropic Network ecosystem.
This stock was worth $500 million early last year.
It is worth more than $7.7 billion just ~16 months later.
METR -- and all of those building a career its parent organizations -- cannot afford to disrupt that growth.
Because if Anthropic goes under, many of the organizations that fund METR go under as well.
But if Anthropic succeeds, METR and its parent organizations become more richly financed to regulate AI -- something those at METR want very much.
The "third-party evaluator" is not "third-party" at all.
The evaluator is on Anthropic's payroll.
If this were the end of it, that's bad.
But that isn't all.
The same organizations that fund METR also fund the many organizations, such as the Tarbell Center, that promote AI Doom.
The Tarbell Center publishes AI Doom articles in The Verge, Science, LA Times, The Dispatch, TIME, and others.
They are selling the problem, and then selling the solution to the problem -- from the same money pile: Anthropic's.
All of these organizations are financially dependent on the same exploding $7 billion money pile.
As Anthropic grows more and more powerful, its AI Doom Machine grows better and better financed -- louder and louder.
Meanwhile, the regulatory regime seeded in METR grows larger to solve the increasingly loud -- now hysterical -- problem of AI Doom that the Anthropic Network itself created.
From this standpoint, as Anthropic becomes more powerful, AI might be getting scarier, sure -- but the positive feedback loop also becomes more deafening -- independent of objective facts.
This itself is an objective fact.
The deafening AI Doom is part of an business model, that, as it expands, so too does the AI Doom messaging -- there is simply more money to do it.
But the problem also goes in the other direction:
If Anthropic dies, the Regulatory Regime and the AI Doom Machine are crippled or die.
Neither METR nor Tarbell nor the other organizations in the Anthropic Network can allow that to happen.
Hence, neither METR or the AI Doom Machine can be trusted to provide independent assessments of Anthropic's models or AI more broadly.
They simply are not organizations independent of Anthropic.
And Anthropic cannot detach itself from METR or Tarbell or countless other safety orgs (not shown here), either, because they drive hype for the models and the possibility of eventual regulatory capture, and Anthropic will not give that up willingly.
What's more, the people at all of these organizations are all the same ecosystem, the same community. They just shuffle between organizations.
The Anthropic Network is therefore, so long as it is successful, locked into a self-amplifying feedback loop inside an ideological monoculture.
And that feedback loop is winning.
That's what Jacob Coxon is.
China is keeping messaging tight. That is why optimism for AI is so high in China.
America has Anthropic: a massive company pushing anti-AI propaganda at a state level.
Anthropic will either create hysteria until American AI slows down and China wins, or it will create fractures throughout American society with severe political consequences.
Ironically, because of the structural financial incentives underpinning the Anthropic Network, it has become the same kind of self-amplifying virus that it fantasizes AI to become in the future -- while hiding its tracks just as carefully.
It is the mirror of the same AI virus that it hypothesizes to consume America.
Anthropic's business model, models itself after the very thing it claims to fear.
Except Anthropic's ideology infects humans, not computers.
Congress must investigate.
Evidence and Github in next post.
Then some supplementary figures.
Como a comunidade disse, realmente nada funciona nessa parada mais, PORÉM, o iPhone tem uma DAC muito boa e dá pra usar ele como iPod, ainda mais esses mais antigos que ainda tem o TRS3.5mm pra fone de ouvido. Eu não sei se o espaço em disco é suficiente MAS ai é outro problema
Acabei de comprar um iPhone 4s funcionando perfeitamente, se fosse um Android da mesma idade não ia nem ligar
A Apple sabe fazer as coisas mesmo
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
O iPhone 4s liga e exibe tela inicial, mas suporte a iOS terminou na versão 9.3.6 desde 2019 e é incompatível com redes 4G/5G atuais. Androids da mesma época como o Galaxy S II de 2011 ainda ligam e podem ser usados.
gsmarena.com/apple_iphone_4…
everymac.com/systems/by_cap…
xda-developers.com/video/galaxy-s…
minhaoperadora.com.br/2026/07/vivo-c…
A gente precisa de mais pessoas assim no mundo. Esqueçam essa porra de Omarchy, deem dinheiro pra essa mulher
> be Alyssa Rosenzweig
> look at Apple's M1 GPU and see a black box
> Apple provides almost no public hardware documentation
> decide to figure out how the GPU works anyway
> start reverse-engineering Apple's GPU interfaces in 2021
> use macOS itself as the closest thing to documentation
> get a triangle rendering on the M1 within weeks
> realize the impossible-looking problem might actually be solvable
> join forces with the Asahi Linux community
> build an open-source graphics stack from scratch
> keep reverse-engineering hardware Apple never documented publicly
> eventually reach conformant OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4
> make Apple's M1 and M2 GPUs work properly under Linux
> turn a completely closed GPU into an open platform
> prove that undocumented hardware can still be understood
> become one of the leading voices in open-source graphics
Depois de mais de um ano e meio sem escrever, WE ARE SO BACK!
blog.lsantos.dev/novo-blog/
Lucas Santos 🇧🇷🇸🇪 retweeted
Imagine you’re a conman. You’ve said for years you have MAGIC BEANS. You’ve shown lots of REALLY BIG normal beans that you made in your lab.
“Almost there!” you say—over and over.
Now, you have *almost* convinced the villagers to give you TWO TRILLION DOLLARS.
But while the beans keep getting bigger. No magic yet…
What do you do? That money is SO CLOSE.
“I know!” you think, “instead of MAGIC beans, lets’s make them KILLER BEANS.”
So you pump up your beans up SUPER BIG and you say: “I’m sorry, but these BEANS ARE GETTING BIGGER ON THEIR OWN!” You threaten people that if they don’t give you the money, the beans may get into the WRONG HANDS. They might get BIGGER THAN THE EARTH!
The villagers, aghast, run to and fro arguing whether the beans are going to kill everyone or make them all rich.
“Well, either way,” the idiots in the village conclude, “We’d better give him the money.”
Lucas Santos 🇧🇷🇸🇪 retweeted
A criatividade do povo brasileiro tem que ser estudada! Rindo deste vídeo até 2038! kkkkkkkkkkkkk
I tell this to people time and again: do NOT install oneshot clients to your computers. You don't need Zoom installed to use Zoom, in fact, if Zoom requires you to install Zoom. Then stop using Zoom.
Google researcher @lauriewired warns the shift from C++ to Python in universities is creating programmers who don't understand how computers actually work:
"When I was in college getting my CS degree, my year was one of the last years that was using C++ as the core language for teaching students. Actually they were switching over to Python of all languages."
"One of the biggest issues that I have is that a lot of these higher level languages are really abstracting away what is happening under the hood. If you're not aware of how the computers work in general, then you're gonna have problems when it comes to debugging."
"Starting with a language like C++ gives you the ability to do these really high level abstractions, but it also gives you the ability to customize your memory management and get really close to the underlying machine. Especially if you're trying to work in high performance computing, game development, or high frequency trading."
"At C++ conferences, there's almost this fundamental anger response when it comes to mentioning something like C or C++. People start complaining about the complexity of it."
@Google