Tony Montana casually eating a lemon from a bowl might seem like a humorous detail, but it reveals something much deeper about his character in Scarface. Surrounded by expensive suits, luxurious restaurants, and wealthy people, Tony is determined to prove he belongs among the elite. Yet the bowl in front of him isn’t meant for eating. It’s a finger bowl, traditionally used to rinse your fingers during a formal meal. Tony doesn’t realize this, and no one bothers to correct him. That’s what makes the moment so revealing. He can afford designer clothes, expensive dinners, and a lavish lifestyle, but wealth can’t instantly teach him the social customs of a world he never grew up in. Coming from poverty in Cuba, Tony never had the opportunity to learn the unwritten rules of high society. His ambition has earned him a place at the table, but he’s still unfamiliar with the culture surrounding it. That single lemon becomes a subtle symbol of his journey. Tony has the money to enter a world he once dreamed of, but he hasn’t fully learned how to fit into it. In a movie defined by power, greed, and violence, one tiny detail reveals more about his character than an entire conversation could.

Togi Explains Why He Ignores Trading Advice From Broke People "I'm doing a $1M to $3M trading challenge, but my $1.5M stock portfolio was getting way too boring, so I started trading options." "I bought Moderna calls while I was in Romania, then got hit with a $20K margin call." "Everyone on Twitter suddenly thinks they're an options expert. Everyone acts so smart, and everyone's also so fucking poor." "If 95% of traders lose and everyone on the internet says I'm an idiot, I feel like I'm right." "I'm up $200K. Moderna fucking ripped right after I wired the money."

Lectures 1-3 are up, with lecture videos, tutorials and (so far) the first assignment.

Maybe time to accept day trading doesn't work (proven by numerous studies) and just put your money in an ETF

Mark Zuckerberg’s awkward Guinness sipping is just the latest episode of CEOs trying — and failing — to be relatable, @bethkowitt explains 🎥

no this isn't 100% right each time (if you expect that, you're an idiot- stop trading) when it is.. it's precise because we use actual market maker positions (0 guesses) & spent decades as SPX market makers (so we actually know a thing or 2 about how it works)

Everyone coping about how they think losses are part of the game. No Any large losses, losing streaks, or a win rate lower than 80% (1r) is strictly you not understanding the market or how to control yourself

Only bad traders take losses You can almost always exit for break even. The market will always tell you its going to reverse and then allow you to exit at breakeven… If you entered in the correct spot. Only about 10% of the time when your wrong does price jump without offering an exit Bad traders lose money, good traders exit when theyre wrong before they lose

I’ve never met a millionaire that made their money from investing into the stock market. All of them focused on building a business or increasing their income from a 9-5 job while investing into index funds. Taking risks does not mean gambling in the market.

Professional poker player Phil Ivey won $9.6 million at the Borgata. The casino paid him, then sued to get it back. At London’s Crockfords, he won another £7.7 million. They refused to pay. In the video below, Ivey says his job is to play the game, find a weakness in the casino and use it to win. He calls the casino his opponent and points out that it spends millions of dollars protecting its games. He wanted a specific brand of cards, a Cantonese-speaking dealer and the same decks reused. The casinos agreed. His playing partner, Cheung Yin Sun, asked the dealer to rotate certain cards, presenting it as a matter of luck. The cards had tiny differences along their backs. Once high-value cards faced one way and the others faced the opposite way, those differences helped identify what was coming next. Ivey never marked the cards. The dealer handled them. But the casino didn’t understand what those requests were doing to the odds. He called it an advantage. The casinos called it cheating. In 2017, the UK Supreme Court ruled against him: persuading the dealer to arrange the cards crossed the line. The casino had approved his requests while expecting to win. Ivey knew something about its own cards that it didn’t. Was he cheating, or should a casino know its own game before accepting someone’s money?

God knows I love @stoolpresidente and his pizza reviews, but can we just drop the charade now? One bite???

🌙Moontower Wednesday I taught a "trading lab" at the @RobinhoodApp Summit last week with @mat_cashman Today's moontower steps through it: moontower.substack.com/p/vib… refs: @FundamentEdge

1/ Gamma sounds complicated, but the basic idea is simple: Delta measures how much an option responds to a move in the underlying. Gamma measures how quickly that delta changes as price moves. That second layer can have a real impact on market behavior.