Mr_AUSTRALIA⚡️ retweeted
THE EMBLEMS ARE HERE 🙌🔥
Consider this your official reveal 😉
Inspired by our reef, beaches, hinterland and everything in between, they bring together the places, people and spirit that will take us to 2032.
Distinctive. Unmistakably Queensland. And just a little bit cheeky
Brisbane, Queensland, Australia - this one’s yours 💗
Unfortunately the @NRLKnights could not match these sudden, erratic manoeuvres of the @sydneyroosters the now @NRL 2026 Grand Finalists 🏆
Mr_AUSTRALIA⚡️ retweeted
There he is. Albanese. Getting shit faced on the public purse at the NRL Grand Final.
He took the VIP jet from Canberra to Sydney for this mind you.
The bloke goes for South Sydney but he turns up to a Roosters Game. Or is he a long term Knights supporter?
He's in it for the grog.
And guess what? he pisses off to Fiji in the VIP jet Monday morning.
BeTTer GeT YoGo HQ oN to iT‼️.. 🙈📞
@BrownesDairy
The uploaded YoGorilla commercial clearly depicts the character using a hinged flip phone with a screen showing the other caller, presenting the idea of portable video calling in an animated advertisement. If this commercial aired during the YoGorilla campaign’s reported 1990s or early-2000s period, it predates Apple’s 6 July 2011 filing for “Flexible display devices” and Google’s 8 June 2017 priority date for its folding-display patent, although the specific clip’s original broadcast date remains unverified. The distinction is that YoGorilla’s phone has a separate upper screen and lower keypad connected by a hinge, while those later patents concern particular technologies for flexible screens that bend or fold. The commercial therefore illustrates an earlier depiction of a video-calling flip phone!
#YogoHQ🦍
Bega acquired the later Lion Dairy & Drinks business on 25 January 2021. Successfully challenging a patent could remove or narrow the patent owner’s exclusive rights. If an earlier public disclosure established that the claimed invention lacked novelty, the relevant claims could be revoked or restricted. Others could then use technology covered solely by those invalidated claims without permission under that patent, although other patents or rights might still apply. In Australia, a granted patent can be reassessed through re-examination.
For the YoGorilla commercial to support such a challenge, its public availability before the relevant priority date would need verification, and its content would need to be compared with the particular claims. Depicting a hinged video-calling phone does not automatically invalidate patents covering specific flexible-screen technologies.
Even if the commercial helped invalidate a patent, that would not itself establish Bega as the inventor, transfer ownership to Bega or entitle it to royalties. Bega could potentially seek compensation for a separate infringement of rights it actually owns—for example, unauthorised copying of protected footage or artwork—subject to applicable exceptions and time limits. Copyright ⓒ protects the commercial’s expression rather than the underlying phone concept, while unpaid royalties would require an applicable licensing obligation.
The word of the day is:
CRAPSPRINKLER
(n.) Someone who doesn’t just
create drama, they spary it
everywhere. One bad mood, one
stupid comment, and suddenly
everone nearby is covered in
their nonsense. Absolute
crapsprinkler.
xitter.cf/PaulineHansonOz/status…
@PaulineHansonOz
If Australia replaced 424 parliamentary positions across the federal, state and territory parliaments—approximately half the national total—together with their associated electorate staff, with an AI system, our expanded model estimates approximately A$343 million in annual expenditure could be removed!
This comprises approximately A$88.44 million in politicians’ remuneration, A$123.18 million in electorate staffing, and A$25.39 million in estimated employer superannuation. It also includes assumed annual expenditure of A$21.2 million on additional allowances, A$21.2 million on travel and vehicles, and A$63.6 million on offices, utilities, communications and administration. The calculation uses a mix of parliamentary salaries across Australia; its staffing and operating-cost assumptions make it a budgeting scenario, rather than a verified national expenditure total.
Over ten years, holding these costs constant, that would represent approximately A$3.43 billion in gross expenditure removed. Actual savings would depend on how much spending disappeared and the cost of developing, operating, securing and maintaining the replacement AI system. Human oversight, retained constituent-service staff, redundancy payments and existing office leases would reduce savings. Consequently, A$343 million a year is the modelled gross amount before replacement and transition costs, with alternative operating-cost assumptions producing an annual range of approximately A$279 million–A$364 million. 🤖😂
At the UN, Anthony Albanese linked social media algorithms, misinformation, political extremism and his social media crackdown to the rise of parties like One Nation.
He claimed: "I didn't link the two."
What a joke. The transcript exists. The video exists.
Australians can see exactly what he said. The problem isn't misinformation.
The problem is he got caught saying the censorship plans out loud.
xitter.cf/pepsi/status/210351488…
@pepsi
If you could create a new flavour of Pepsi, it would be @PEPSI POWER cola; energy drink as they are a trend!
Coalition promises $50 toll caps if it wins Vic election afr.com/politics/coalition-p… @FinancialReview
@FinancialReview
If Australian toll-road operators continue charging motorists according to long-term concession agreements, then toll-road performance should also be part of the discussion!
Motorists pay a premium to use toll infrastructure partly because it is intended to provide faster, safer and more reliable transport. If severe congestion substantially removes that advantage, why should exactly the same premium toll apply regardless of the service actually delivered?
Take Brisbane's Gateway Motorway as an example. Queensland itself acknowledges long-standing congestion on parts of the Gateway corridor and is undertaking upgrades intended to reduce peak-hour congestion and improve travel reliability. Department of Transport and Main RoadsInstead of simply applying the full toll whenever a vehicle passes a toll point, Australia could consider a performance-based tolling framework :Normal traffic — A$6.02
Moderate sustained congestion — A$4.50
Severe congestion — A$3.00
Major prolonged gridlock — A$1–2, or an automatic account credit.
Those figures are illustrative, not current policy. The important principle is that the price paid would partly reflect the service received. Queensland already has the technology needed to measure motorway performance. Its Smart Motorways system uses vehicle detectors, CCTV, variable signs and real-time traffic information specifically to monitor congestion, improve traffic flow and make journey times more predictable. Department of Transport and Main RoadsA performance system therefore wouldn't need motorists to lodge claims saying, “I was stuck in traffic.” The network could determine automatically that a particular journey experienced qualifying severe congestion and apply the appropriate credit afterward. Retrospective credits would also avoid the problem of announcing cheaper tolls during congestion and inadvertently attracting even more vehicles onto an overloaded motorway.Most importantly, performance-based charging would change the incentive. If persistent congestion reduced toll revenue, operators would have a stronger financial incentive to maintain lane availability, clear incidents rapidly and improve traffic management. There is even international precedent for linking private-road payments to congestion performance. An Australian Government study of overseas toll-road concessions describes UK arrangements where concession payments could be reduced when motorists experienced congestion attributable to the concessionaire, using measures including average vehicle speeds. The proposition isn't that toll roads should be free. It's that a premium toll should have a measurable level of service attached to it.
And there is an especially interesting point in Queensland: the Gateway and Logan concession requires the franchisee to provide traffic information and traffic-incident management services, among other user services. Department of Transport and Main Roads That makes the distinction between charging for access and charging for performance particularly worth examining!
🤖 Made with AI
Remove Profit-Driven Tolling from Queensland Roads
Eligibility - Residents of the State of Queensland sign the below petition. Closing Date: 23/12/2026
parliament.qld.gov.au/Work-o…
The word of the day is:
ASKHOLE
(n.) A person who constantly asks for your advice, yet always does the opposite of what you told them.
xitter.cf/OMGTheMess/status/2100…
@OMGTheMess
🚏🚌 Pretty sure 50 cent fares are still available on public transport if they don't own their own vehicle! 😃
Crown Design Competition
Design your coin, send your submission and be in to win big!
• $50,000AUD grand prize
• Winning design struck in gold & silver
• Entries close end of September
“A design of any nature suitable to Australia, and the words AUSTRALIA 2027.”
Send your complete design to [email protected] or upload via australiancoinreview.com.au/…
🤖 Made with AI
Mr_AUSTRALIA⚡️ retweeted
18 MORE WEEKENDS BEFORE #CHRISTMAS!
👉 YourChristmasCountdown.com 🎄🎅















