OSG retweeted
Throwing open the doors to "skilled" immigration in the midst of an employment crisis is black-hearted treachery. If there are shortages in certain occupations, that means there is an incentive for Canadians to seek training to fill those vacancies. Dumping Indian biomass into the hole removes that incentive, leaving un- and underemployed Canadians languishing.
Immogration destroys the earning potential of those occupations. Canadians already working in those fields have much less reason to stay in Canada if they can't be paid well for their work. Many will leave for the States. Making those shortages worse.
Foreign credentials, particularly from India, are unreliable to put it very mildly. Have you even looked at India? The absolute state of that jerry-rigged cesspit of a country? Does India strike you as a country full of high-quality, well-trained skilled tradesmen? It's the most corrupt country on planet Earth. Do you think we can trust the credentials of their medical professionals? Is that the basis you want to "build Canada" on?
All of those practical issues aside, Canada is not an economic zone. It is a country. It is the territory and state of the Canadian peoples. The sole and only purpose of the Canadian state is the flourishing of the Canadian peoples. It is not corporate profit maximization. It is absolutely not the flourishing of foreign peoples. We could not possibly care less if "Canada" is "prosperous" if Canada becomes an Indian colony. Prosperity only matters insofar as it is the prosperity of actual Canadians.
well, this generated a lot of replies.
immigration is one of the most contested files in the country and people have good reason to be angry about how it's been run.
ignoring that many of the replies are just bot flooding triggered by a keyword, I do think it's worth a more nuanced post than a quick one-liner.
so, here's a fuller version:
first, the replies saying we're not labour-constrained are right. there are 3 unemployed canadians for every job vacancy. in 2022 it was 1 to 1. vacancies have halved since then and youth unemployment is 13%.
there is no general labour shortage.
what's left are specific shortages: nurses in remote regions, licensed trades, some engineering. jobs that need someone with a specific a credential or willing to be in a specific location.
that's why yesterday's change is directionally good. points now follow jobs that pay at least 1.3x the national median, which is exactly where the real gaps are. it is an attempt to end the "come study, work a low-wage job, hope for PR." approach to immigration.
Build Canada has published several memos in the past making the case for prioritizing higher skilled immigrants who will more immediately contribute to economic growth. I interpret this change as a sign this government is trying to be more thoughtful about who, not how many.
my concern, and one shared in the comments: the LMIA has been removed as a requirement from the job-offer. to be fair, it was totally broken, people were buying LMIAs, and there was massive fraud, so i get why the government removed this.
but, in a 3:1 labour market, a 100-point job offer with no published check has high potential for being a fraud magnet, as many have pointed out. "IRCC will verify" is not a method and I think this is a real weakness. IRCC should be more specific about how they will verify and put up a public website that shows the audit rate and the enforcement numbers in real time so that Canadians can see if this is working.
the other big piece everyone is arguing about: vacancies didn't fall because the jobs got filled. they fell because demand fell. the problem is that we're not creating enough high-wage jobs for the people already here. that's a growth problem, and no immigration policy will fix it.
so yes, there are definitely challenges, but better targeting to prioritize high income and high skilled immigrants is a good step -- necessary, but not sufficient -- in starting to fix what has become a very broken system.
OSG retweeted
None of the many Reform supporters who I know follow me have replied, so I will try again: What do you want from us?
Yes most Restore members were Reform members.
But we were all either expelled or made clear that our views were unwanted.
It was Reforms choice to make the tent smaller.
Even after that we offered a pact. And was met with extreme scorn and derision, I remember it well.
Since then we get insulted very regularly - told we owe Reform our vote, but Reform owes us nothing at all.
You all appear to be suggesting we vote for a party that very clearly hates us and will not represent our views, and that we willingly go without political representation in a democratic system.
And perhaps its true that a Reform government will extend the timetable for our ethnic replacement by a few years compared to Labour, but only by a few because mass deportations are treated as heresy, impossible - by a party that considers Afghans who arrived a year ago to be the inheritors of King Alfred.
I don't want what Reform is offering. I want what Restore is offering. Not merely an extension on the end of my people.
By all means attack, insult and ridicule again if you like, its not like you ever stop. But your chances of winning me over that way categorically won't work.
OSG retweeted
My hatred of Indians was cultivated exclusively in academic and corporate environments where I have universally found them to be both unbearable to interact with and utterly incompetent at whatever task they are attempting.
OSG retweeted
the way third worlders use the word "jobs" is less like you or I would- ie doing work- and more like the primitive thoughtform a maggot might have when its chemoreceptors detect ripe flesh: a cavity in which to hunker down, feast, & someday shit out eggs (to take more "jobs").
OSG retweeted
What is the root of all the confusion about the Church's traditional teaching on capital punishment? Personalism.
Personalism is essentially the subordination of the common good to the individual good. The reason for this is the dignity of the person. This is easily refuted. The temporal common good is the highest of purely natural goods. Therefore, the subordination of the individual person to temporal society is not in tension with human dignity, but is concordant with human dignity since it is a subordination of the human person to the human person's highest natural good.
Personalism is, at root, a form of liberal individualism because it elevates the individual good above the temporal common good. It also does profound damage to human dignity because the dignity of man cannot be fully realised without the proper ordering of the human person to the highest natural good: natural happiness, which is the common good.
OSG retweeted
Everyone keeps focusing on the word “inadmissible” in Catechism §2267. We dance around modern prisons, rehabilitation, alternative ways to satisfy retributive justice, and our supposedly new understanding of human dignity. But all of that misses the central theological problem.
The Catechism says capital punishment is inadmissible “because it is an attack on the inviolability and dignity of the person.” That is the critical phrase.
If capital punishment is an attack on the inviolable dignity of the human person by its very nature, then it is intrinsically evil. And if it is intrinsically evil today, it was intrinsically evil for the last 2,000 years. Human dignity did not suddenly change in 2018. And yet the Church taught its moral legitimacy for centuries.
That is rupture, not development. No amount of talk about prisons, rehabilitation, or modern circumstances resolves that contradiction.
I am not a Protestant for pointing this out. I am not a bad Catholic, an apostate, a schismatic, or a heretic. Nor am I insulting the Pope. I am applying the principles of Catholic moral theology to the actual words of the 2018 Catechism.
And I am saying what so many appear determined not to say: the emperor has no clothes.
OSG retweeted
The Catholic Church has historically taught that the faithful owe genuine intellectual assent to the Ordinary Magisterium, even when its teachings have not been infallibly defined. Pope Pius IX affirmed this obligation in Tuas Libenter (1863) and Quanta Cura (1864), while the First Vatican Council reiterated the duty of avoiding errors condemned by the Holy See (Dei Filius, 1870). Pope St. Pius X reinforced this obligation in Lamentabili Sane Exitu and Praestantia Scripturae(1907), while Pope Pius XII reaffirmed in Humani Generis (1950) that papal encyclicals demand assent as exercises of the Ordinary Magisterium.
Consequently, Catholics owe religious submission of intellect and will to authentic, non-definitive magisterial teachings (Lumen Gentium, 25). However, because such teachings are not necessarily infallible, the possibility of error or subsequent correction cannot be entirely excluded. As Donum Veritatis (1990) acknowledges, Catholics may encounter genuine intellectual difficulties that do not necessarily constitute sinful dissent, provided they approach these questions respectfully and remain open to the Church's judgment.
This is precisely where I find the contemporary questions surrounding the death penalty and Amoris Laetitia so troubling. The 2018 revision of the Catechism (2267) declares capital punishment inadmissible, apparently contradicting centuries of authoritative Catholic teaching defending its legitimate exercise, including the Roman Catechism. Likewise, Amoris Laetitia (305, footnote 351), together with the Buenos Aires guidelines, allows sacramental admission in certain circumstances for divorced and civilly remarried Catholics who continue engaging in marital relations, apparently contradicting the requirements previously articulated in Familiaris Consortio (84). These are not merely private opinions of Pope Francis, but authoritative magisterial developments to which Catholics are expected to give religious submission.
The difficulty, therefore, is not simply that I disagree with certain contemporary teachings, but that the Ordinary Magisterium appears to be contradicting what the Church herself previously taught with authority. I recognize that distinctions concerning doctrinal development, disciplinary changes, prudential judgments, and subjective culpability have been proposed, but these explanations must actually demonstrate continuity rather than merely assume it. If Catholics are obliged to submit their intellect and will to both earlier and contemporary magisterial teachings, how are they supposed to reconcile judgments that appear to contradict one another? This presents a serious theological difficulty concerning the consistency and reliability of the Church's teaching authority. Ultimately, while theologians may propose possible reconciliations, only the Church herself can authoritatively clarify these apparent contradictions and resolve the difficulties they present for the faithful. If she does not....well....then that is telling.
The death penalty is inadmissible because it is an attack on the inviolability and dignity of the person. The common good can be safeguarded and the requirements of justice can be met without recourse to capital punishment: effective systems of detention have been developed that protect citizens while at the same time do not completely deprive those who are guilty of the possibility of redemption. #NoDeathPenalty
OSG retweeted
Indians commonly believe that Indian IT immigrants have underpinned America’s technological advantage, but the outside world generally holds that Indian IT immigrants help lower costs while, on the whole, having only a negligible impact on U.S. technological superiority.
I could cite many more examples. For instance, some strategic researchers in India argue that India possesses the world’s largest potential market, and that whichever of China or the United States loses the Indian market will surely be defeated in the contest.
This also shows that Indians’ perception of the world differs from that of many of us. Their outlook tends toward optimism and forward-looking thinking, overvalues their own interests, and magnifies their own role—so much so that they often overlook the gap between their perceptions and conventional wisdom. Ultimately, this is bound to produce the following outcomes:
In their optimism, they often neglect potential risks;
in their fondness for looking ahead, they ignore historical inertia and the lessons of experience;
in overvaluing their own interests, they cannot reach agreement when the other side asks for compromise;
in magnifying their own role, they make major misjudgments about the future, further worsening the above tendencies.
Because of this cognitive gap, even when India wishes to stay aloof amid today’s increasingly turbulent global disorder, it is often repeatedly forced to fall into and become entangled in it.
This cast of mind among Indians is everywhere, not only in the matter of the role of Indian Americans. Back in 2022, I shared this view with my friends: I believed that in the China-U.S. rivalry, India overestimated U.S. power, underestimated Chinese power, overestimated India’s own power, and overvalued India’s strategic role in counterbalancing China’s influence. Then, after Trump entered the White House in 2025, events proved me exactly right.
This is by no means a view of India held by me alone, nor is it by any means a one-sided Chinese view of Indians. I have observed far too many similar tendencies in discussion. Chinese people may disagree with people of other countries on virtually any topic, yet they are astonishingly unanimous in their views of Indians.
Indian engineers are not equivalent to Chinese engineers. Not even close.
And sending us more Indians doesn't mean China loses.
China is behind slightly in tech due to our sanctions, not because we have infinity Indians.
If anything, our national security is now threatened because our culture is so fractured. China will continue to outpace us in tech due to their commitment to cultural cohesion.
OSG retweeted
Anglo-Celt is an OP ethnos but you need to know how to deploy it properly. Needs a new frontier every 150 years for best results otherwise it will tend to wilt. Use in an expansion focused civilisational up-cycle, they work less well in the established involution-refinement stage
OSG retweeted
New type of Vietnam War revisionism where it is a good thing the North won because it actually preserved ‘Vietnamese-ness’ and delayed Vietnam’s development into a First World country until the exact moment other longtime wealthy countries are getting yookayfied by hypermodernity
Vietnam is not only going to become the last developed country, it's going to become the last country in any meaningful sense of the word. A coherent nation-state with a national identity, culture, and history that engages with the world on its own terms. Most other countries will be reduced to microcosms of a single global caste system ordered by Angloid adjacency, English fluency, and integration into global financial and labor markets.
OSG retweeted
The binding agent of the anti-white coalition is sexual resentment
OSG retweeted
We aren’t asking you to “prove your trauma.” You’ve accused Canadians of all manner of unspeakable crimes. If those crimes have been committed they must be investigated. If true, they must be prosecuted. If false, that is libel, which is a crime. You are not entitled to force generations of Canadians (including those not yet born) who had nothing whatsoever to do with residential schools to wear sackcloth and ashes forever while paying billions of dollars in taxes to you. You are not entitled to tell our children that they are evil oppressors. I think that you’ve blood-libelled us, and I, along with many of my compatriots who wanted nothing more than to make things right are now fed up. Do you imagine that you are the only people who sit with grief and the bones of your ancestors? You are not, I do assure you. You are not.
OSG retweeted
“What is truth?”
How can we talk about “truth” when there are those who would make it illegal to question the veracity of the claim of mass graves.
Here is a truth to consider: the Liberal government embraced this claim because it was easier to use Christians as a scapegoats for a program of liberal social engineering designed by the government and then staffed by the churches and then criminally underfunded.
When churches were burned in response Justin Trudeau spoke out of both sides of his mouth on the one hand offering perfunctory condemnations while also saying that the fires were “fully understandable.”
Why is no one seeking reconciliation with the Christian community over this? Over 100 churches have been burned and there has been no apology for the false or overzealous and unverified claims of indigenous groups.
No one denies that unpleasant things happened in the schools or that there were not abuses; but this elides the reality that there were many more trying to do their best as Christians put in a difficult situation by their own government. Yet the government is quick to blame the schools and the churches that ran them, but refuses to accept responsibility for the ideology and the policies that led to their creation in the first place.
If there are apologies that must be made to the indigenous communities there is just as much apologies and reconciliation that must be made with the Christian community that has been unjustly scapegoated in all of this.
OSG retweeted
Actually, the “Slutcon” “controversy” is very simple and straightforward. “Slutcon” an organized pimping ring.
Let me explain. Men pay thousands of dollars to attend (just like a customer!). Women apply to work the event (just like an employee!). Female workers either get paid directly, gain work connections and leverage, and/or boost their own sex work side hustle careers. Open your eyes: it’s an event organized so a group of hired female workers can financially benefit in exchange for providing sexual services that men pay for.
Aella, like millions of successful-but-aging prostitutes before her, is making the transition from prostitute to pimp (or madam, as they used to call it).
The fact that supposedly intelligent “tech people” from the “tech sphere” are such utter philistines and naïve rubes that seemingly none of you are even capable of identifying the oldest trick in the book is truly risible. Instead, what we get is literal days and days of “nuanced” and breathless discourse over “the delicate issue of Slutcon🥺”.
You are all rubes. Marks. And so utterly arrogant in your belief of your own exceptionalism that you count yourselves above human nature, too interesting to learn any human history, and that’s why this sphere is constantly defeated over and over by the simplest and pettiest villains of the human story: cults, hookers, and swindlers.
Slutcon recap:
- There's an autistic sex party. This isn't my thing, but fine, autists like sex and need help socializing and having a thing where autism is normal is for the best
- Some autistic sex preferences are out of line with mainstream sex preferences. Not normal "weird," but trigger a disgust response. Probably irrational per se, as most disgust responses are, definitely a thing that's happening.
- However, the slutcon attendees overlap 80% (lets say) with AI safety advocates, which means most attendees are politically and professionally involved in an emerging industry with public facing goals
- Therefore, professional advancement and networking are gatekept by attending the consensual rape orgy, through no fault of the organizers, because it's coincidental that the overlap is so huge
- This is also terrible publicity given that they want electoral support for their political goals
Most of the slutcon attendees are my mutuals, they're just trying to do their thing, they're not trying to do anything "wrong," but the organizers are oblivious to the fact that this is something where optics matter and it's cooking their political goals.
OSG retweeted
“In my immigrant community we have lots of cultural stuff barely anyone outside of it knows exists and we haven’t really integrated yet ❤️”
OSG retweeted
Many will respond to this calling hypocrisy that he doesn't understand course correction after years of DEI and mass immigration but you'll fail to understand-
He knows this already.
He's a conservative political commentator. Of course he knows the discourse of the hottest political topic.
He is lying to his viewers knowingly because he has no ties to the American identity.
Only the jewish.
This is the Esau Gambit, jewish mitosis. Jews of polar opposite backgrounds always move together in only two ways, with or without intention. Those conguencies are anything that is beneficial to jews and anything that is detrimental to European identity/longevity.
Jewish identity is extremely in-group preferenced. Their religion teaches supremacy and tells them to be cunning and shrude to outsiders. They also have an atheistic religion for their progressive progeny who strayed from the temple. This is the holocaust. They inherently have an identity of an outsider in the nations they inhabit as they've never made a home for themselves and have always been cast out from every place previously occupied.
Now let's apply this understanding to Ben and assess the obvious things Ben should be aware of: Ben understands the "left" imported votes. He knows the weight on the welfare system. He understands job and home displacement. He understands currency devaluation. He understands a ship has a max capacity for a reason and understands why the extra passengers aren't beneficial in any way. Ben understands demographic replacement and has flatly said he does not care about Europeans being replaced in their home nations. Ben is aware, if even out of shame, that jews despite their small population have and extreme over representation in leading progressive cultural revolutions. But still he lied and said they don't, and that "his" community in particle was opposed to DEI and illegal immigrantion. But here, in this quoted tweet, he's stating that fixing these issues would be a "continuation of DEI".
So let's try to piece together what the goal of this view is. Is it a race blind GDP worshipping American identity within him where he doesn't care about the nation being gutted, the private sector depending on injections from the public sector, companies offshoring everything from production to administration to cut costs with endless inflation and devaluation, etc.? Does he just see America as a formless mass of goys he needs to keep running to continue an IV drip to Israel, the place he truly recognizes as his home? Is it genuine racial animosity towards whites?
Whatever it is, even if garden variety conservatives are just another form of dumb liberal, this end of politics often discusses the hard numbers on immigration fallout. He knows that there is no positive. He knows Indians hold fake degrees and do not perform. He knows the same with all. He knows welfare rates.
He knows this has only been detrimental, that it was foisted upon US citizens, but he's still choosing to lie and protect the "accomplishments" of the left.
To anyone paying attention, it should be obvious this man is a rat.
OSG retweeted
This is where the Arabs were ahead of us
By castrating all their slaves, they made sure that there were no descendants who could claim reparations
I’ve had enough of these grifters. If another government comes whining for slavery reparations from the country that distinguished itself by its relentless global abolitionism, we should treat it as a hostile act and respond with economic sanctions.
dailymail.com/debate/article…
