DreadPiratesFrostee retweeted
A China é based e eu cansei de fingir que não
This Post violated the X Rules. Learn more
DreadPiratesFrostee retweeted
“Even the most left-wing political faction in China is more right-wing than you Brazilian fucking animals' most right-wing Bolsonaro”
DreadPiratesFrostee retweeted
Most incels are normal guys who would've been married with kids had they been born even two decades earlier. Poison dart frogs have one natural predator: a snake species that poisoned itself to death for millions of years until it eventually developed toxin immunity.
DreadPiratesFrostee retweeted
There aren’t actually stronger differences in FST between populations of the same race as there are between different races, the 85-15 human differentiation by race just implies that the majority of differences are within individuals, not between groups (races).
But FST, which Lewontin utilized, is a mathematically flawed measurement of true genetic distance, as subspecies heterozygosity levels of 0.7 ~ found in the human population make an FST above 0.265 impossible to model, even if the real FST is much higher than 0.265 and two races shared zero alleles. Conveniently this is where “anthropologists” have modeled when a subspecies begins at about 0.25 FST.
When you make models that conveniently fit your political predispositions, you typically get outcomes in concordance with said predispositions
In 1970, Richard Lewontin defeated IQ hereditarianism and Arthur Jensen's claims of genetic racial differences in intelligence. In this new post, I tell the story of how it happened.
Relevant to current "race realism" and "race science" claims.
jayjoseph22.substack.com/p/h…
DreadPiratesFrostee retweeted
Really good example here of how leftists don’t even think of Nazism as a specific ideology with specific beliefs and values, but rather as just a synonym for “something I REALLY REALLY REALLY don’t like”
Christian nationalism has nothing to do with nazism. The nazis weren’t Christian nationalists and the vast majority of Christian nationalists are not nazis, yet they call us all nazis because that’s just their buzz word for “super duper mega bad”
Nazism isn’t even the universal endpoint of far right ideology, it’s not even particularly right wing in the classical sense. It’s a unique branch of fascism, which itself isn’t uniquely right wing.
Nazism is literally just German ultranationalist socialism, the only reason edgelords like calling themselves nazis is because it’s the ultimate middle finger to society, identifying with the most vilified thing in modern society.
DreadPiratesFrostee retweeted
I've missed my Confederate posting. I'll get back to it soon I promise. I have a few days left of vacation first.
DreadPiratesFrostee retweeted
Grok rn
Replying to @oriontsx @BaT_MaN_23
Jesus is not a fake god. He is a historical figure with strong contemporary attestation, claimed divinity through resurrection accounts that launched the world's largest religion, and stands apart from the purely mythological figures in that image.
DreadPiratesFrostee retweeted
>Roman soldier pierces the side of Christ
>Blood and water flow from the wound
>Heals his bad eyesight
>“Truly this man was the Son of God”
>Abandons his old life
>Preaches Christ in Cappadocia
>Refuses to worship pagan idols
>They cut out his tongue
>Breaks idols and yells clearly "Now we will see if they are gods or not"
>Is persecuted and tortured for the Faith
>Chooses martyrdom rather than deny Christ
>The soldier who raised a spear against Christ dies as His soldier
Saint Longinus, pray for us.
This is true: Support for coercive wealth redistribution is predicted by envy, self-interest, willingness to inflict harm, and "communal fairness" (essentially meaning "egalitarianism" and practically translating to "everyone should have more stuff because I want more stuff").
Replying to @TheAliceSmith
Socialists really just hate the rich, rather than caring about the poor. Most of their behaviour can be explained by envy and resentment.
DreadPiratesFrostee retweeted
Heil.
DreadPiratesFrostee retweeted
Women were never oppressed. There was NO oppression. What women call oppression today was just PROTECTION.
Let me break it down for you:
1. VOTING:
Women say "we couldn't vote." But back then, voting was not a right, it was a RESPONSIBILITY. Only people who owned property, paid heavy taxes, held public office, or were drafted to DIE in wars could vote.
100% of the people dying in wars were men. You want to vote to send men to war, while you sit at home safe? Makes zero sense. Voting was linked to the DRAFT. You vote, you go to war. Men understood that.
2. BANKING:
"You needed your husband's signature!" Yes, because by LAW, a woman was LEGALLY PROTECTED from debt. Her husband was the head of household and by law HE was 100% liable for ALL debts she made. If she borrowed and couldn't pay, THEY CAME FOR HIM, not her. Creditors went to jail or lost everything - the husband.
So of course his signature was needed. He is the one who goes to prison if you don't pay.
3. PROPERTY - COVERTURE:
They cry about coverture. Coverture meant when you marry, your property merges under ONE name, the husband's, because there was ONE tax filing per household, not two like today. ONE household, ONE name, ONE tax.
It was not to steal from you. It was because the husband was legally responsible for you. If you got sued, he paid. If you owed taxes, he paid. He took your debts too.
These men had mothers they worshipped and daughters they would die for. They were not oppressing women, they were covering them.
4. CONTROLLING WOMEN'S BODIES:
The biggest lie. Back then there were NO abortion pills, NO condoms that worked, NO diapers, NO formula, NO government money to raise a child alone as a single mother, NO good jobs for women to survive alone.
Who bears the most risk in unprotected sex? THE WOMAN. She gets pregnant for 9 months, she risks death during childbirth, which was very common then.
So what did society do? They made sure women stayed virgins until marriage, and made sure men MARRIED them before sex. That is not oppression, that is PROTECTION from becoming a single mother with 3 kids and no food.
And it WORKED. Single motherhood rate was less than 5%. Marriage rate was 90%. Children grew up with fathers.
Today you have "freedom" - 40% single mothers, fatherless homes, abortions everywhere, and women crying that men don't want them.
There was never oppression. There was a system that understood biology and protected women from the consequences of their own choices.
DreadPiratesFrostee retweeted
"Requires social acceptance of degeneracy". Nigga never heard of a covenant community in his live. You can actually just form a community that disallows degenerate behavior and will remove those who violate the rules of the community. And guess what? Its all NAP compliant.










































