狙われ難い、下手だから狙われ持ちます！許して！！😭←考え方ギリわかるけど君より上手い味方が生き残る分持たん方が勝てるで。それにそんな君が最後の1人になってもアーツ無し蘇生出来んよね？
味方に狙われ難い持たれて死ぬお前が下手←は？？どういう理屈？
ハルモニアは狙われ云々の前にアレか、通常だった場合は狙われてる人以外ボス個体狙うなって徹底すべきか。数減らしてから3ゲージ蘇生しようとしたら横からわざわざトドメ刺されて安寧者復ッッ活！！を2回もされてエラい目にあった
熾火 retweeted
It was previously believed that combining aerobic and resistance training could compromise strength and muscle hypertrophy. However, recent meta-analytic findings have challenged this notion (PMID: 34757594).
A new study by Gomes et al. (PMID: 42949799) provides additional insight into the topic. Researchers randomized 30 resistance-trained young men to perform either RT alone, endurance training alone, or concurrent training (RT + endurance). The 11-week RT program initially emphasized maximal strength before shifting toward explosive strength and power development.
Contrary to current meta-analytic findings, results showed statistically similar increases in muscle hypertrophy for RT-only and concurrent training; however, relative gains were appreciably greater with RT alone (17.0% vs. 8.8%). For isometric strength, RT alone significantly increased maximal isometric strength (+18.4%), whereas concurrent training did not produce a significant improvement. Measures of power did not indicate meaningful differences between conditions
These results are particularly interesting given that the aerobic protocol consisted of just three 30-minute treadmill running sessions per week, performed after RT. Although the running intensity progressed from moderate to relatively vigorous levels, the overall aerobic volume was fairly modest and seemingly unlikely to impose excessive physiological demands.
Putting the findings into perspective with the totality of the evidence, the study raises interesting questions about the potential interference effect of concurrent training. One important consideration is that the participants were relatively well-trained, whereas most previous research has involved untrained individuals. It's therefore possible that training status influences the extent to which cardio interferes with strength and hypertrophy adaptations.
That said, the relatively small sample size warrants caution, particularly when interpreting the relative differences in hypertrophy.
Bottom line: The findings suggest that the interference effect may be more nuanced than previously thought, potentially depending on training status, the specific adaptation being measured, and how the training program is structured. More research in trained populations is needed before drawing firm conclusions.
ovid.com/jnls/nsca-jscr/full…
