Technology has to find a solution for this. xitter.cf/ANI/status/21130919464…

Miss. Chen's comment reminded me of some rather unpleasant research experiences from my past。 I used to think India was terrible. But after diving deeper into my research, I realized I was wrong—because I discovered India was far worse than I had ever anticipated. Time and again, I caught myself wondering whether what was documented in books and broadcast on the news could possibly be true. How could such dreadful things exist—things that were deeply repulsive to me both psychologically and physically? For a period, I was researching India's fiscal expenditure, which gradually led me into a deeper study of the Public Distribution System (PDS). I learned that even after gaining independence, famines remained a frequent occurrence in India. Widespread famines in the 1950s forced Jawaharlal Nehru to plead for American aid. From 1965 to 1967, Bihar suffered the most catastrophic famine in post-independence Indian history. Astonishingly, even as late as 2000, Bihar was hit by disaster and plunged into famine once more. I found it almost impossible to fathom such a calamity occurring in the twenty-first century. In ancient China, during a devastating famine where the starving populace was forced to eat tree bark and leaves, the emperor famously asked upon hearing the news: 'Why don't they drink meat broth?' I eventually came to realize that I was acting much like that oblivious emperor. A lifetime of comfortable living in China had led me to take a full stomach for granted as a self-evident birthright. Yet the stark reality is that in India, basic food security does not seem to be self-evident at all. At the same time, domestic violence in India has erupted endlessly. There was the Telangana Armed Rebellion around the time of independence, marked by brutal slaughter between peasants and landlords; the Naxalbari armed uprising of 1967; the persistent turmoil across Northeast India; and the chaotic unrest surrounding linguistically re-organized states. In the 1970s, violence swept Bihar and Jharkhand, where lower-caste populations faced massacres and were driven to take up arms in self-defense. In the 1980s, brutal conflict engulfed Punjab—and it is little wonder that Satwant Singh and Beant Singh assassinated Indira Gandhi, given that their homeland had been ravaged on her orders. After learning the backstory of those two men, I even felt a surge of sympathy for them. In the 1990s, Kashmir plunged into upheaval, accompanied by indiscriminate violence against Muslims by Indian military, police, and Central Armed Police Forces (CAPF)—a pattern that persists to this day. Here I must recall a specific reading experience of mine. Following a terrorist attack in Kashmir in 2016, I set out to understand what was truly transpiring in the region and why young people harbored such intense hatred toward the Indian government. I gathered and read numerous relevant books, only to be utterly horrified by what I uncovered. Account after account in memoirs written by eyewitnesses revealed that most people were not taking up arms out of some abstract quest for independence, but simply because they could no longer endure the monstrous atrocities committed by the Indian government, military, and police. During the 1990s, Indian security forces in Kashmir operated with total impunity, opening fire at will. If a passerby accidentally cast a glance toward soldiers or police officers, he could be summarily detained and extrajudicially executed. One recorded incident involved a neutral government employee who recounted being arbitrarily rounded up alongside complete strangers for no apparent reason. They were marched down to a riverbank and mowed down with machine-gun fire; he survived solely because he happened to be standing behind several others who absorbed the bullets. Another incident remains seared in my memory. A teenage boy had attacked Indian military personnel, resulting in several casualties. That evening, several soldiers went to his home. In front of his father and younger brother, they gang-raped his mother and sister before murdering his father and brother. It was later reported that the perpetrators were comrades and fellow villagers of the slain soldiers who had carried out an extrajudicial reprisal. The matter was subsequently swept under the rug. Oh, and there is another frequently documented incident where a wedding procession was intercepted by security forces; the groom was brutally beaten, and the bride was gang-raped. That incident, too, vanished without accountability. Such horrors were tragically commonplace across Kashmir. At the time, I gasped in horror: how could such an appalling state exist in this world? I initially suspected the authors had fabricated these accounts to persuade me of the Indian government's depravity. Yet the details were so overwhelmingly authentic that I could not doubt their veracity. When another major attack occurred in February 2019, the underlying trigger followed the exact same pattern: the attacker had been subjected to humiliating abuse by police and CAPF personnel, confirming for me that these abuses were indeed a grim reality on the ground. Later, when armed attacks broke out in Manipur, I tried to investigate further. I uncovered a pervasive pattern of sexual violence against local women, including a infamous gang-rape case from 2004. In that incident, a local woman was raped and murdered by members of the Assam Rifles. Demanding justice, several Manipuri mothers stripped completely naked outside the Assam Rifles headquarters, holding a banner that read 'Rape Us,' and shouted in anguish: 'Don't rape our daughters, rape us!' That event shook me to my very core and left me deeply disturbed for a long time. I could only wonder what unimaginable humiliation the locals must have endured to be driven to such a desperate act. I ultimately abandoned that line of research altogether; the harrowing details from Kashmir had inflicted such severe emotional trauma that I had no desire to relive those feelings. Indian commentators frequently parrot Western media narratives criticizing China's policies in Xinjiang, accusing China of human rights violations and claiming the CCP imprisons Uyghurs in concentration camps. The truth, however, is that many Uyghurs suffered from severe poverty caused by geographic isolation, a lack of Mandarin proficiency, and a reliance on state welfare subsidies. To help them lift themselves out of poverty, the CCP government encouraged them to learn vocational skills and participate in modern economic life. Yet Western media vilified these educational and vocational training centers as 'concentration camps' and 'forced labor camps.' Furthermore, information isolation left many lacking a basic understanding of the law. A friend working in Xinjiang recounted a baffling incident: a local Uyghur received a text message from a terrorist claiming that killing a Han person would earn him a cash reward from the local CCP township government—and the man actually carried it out. I thought to myself: even if there were a bounty, it would be paid by the terrorists, not the government; how could anyone be so tragically gullible? Yet that is precisely what happened. Setting geopolitical narratives aside and looking at this from a parental perspective: if the CCP made any mistake, it was forcing people to acquire practical skills to escape poverty, and compelling them to understand that harming others is wrong, illegal, and leads to prison. It reminds me of my own mother: if I played outside and forgot to do my homework, she would slap me without hesitation; if I beat someone up without cause, she would strike me with a broomstick without leniency. Looking back, I can only say that my mother did the absolute right thing. Even setting all that aside and assuming for the sake of argument that those fake news reports and rumors were true, I have never once heard any media outlet accuse the PLA of indiscriminately shooting Uyghurs or carrying out extrajudicial executions; nor have I ever heard of PLA personnel committing rape or sexual assault against women in Xinjiang. Yet a segment of Indians routinely positions itself on a moral high ground to lecture China on how terrible its human rights record supposedly is. By now, I have developed a kind of mental immune system against news coming out of India, allowing me to process mind-boggling headlines with total detachment. For instance, I have long become desensitized to the rampant violence and corruption among Indian police and government officials. Such occurrences are far too numerous to enumerate. A Chinese video blogger once shared anecdotes he heard while traveling in India—how landlords would trick lower-caste laborers into signing indentured servitude contracts, chopping off their hands if their work was deemed unsatisfactory, or how high-caste individuals, upon falling ill, would suspect a lower-caste neighbor of casting 'black magic' and murder them as a result. Some viewers asked me if these stories were true. I replied that while I couldn't verify every detail, they were almost certainly true, because I had come across documentations of things far worse. Another reason I dislike engaging with former Indian officials is that they belong to a privileged elite in India that routinely oppresses others. Police officers and bureaucrats in India function virtually like feudal lords: they can arbitrarily detain, humiliate, beat citizens, destroy private property, scapegoat migrant workers from other states, and extort bribes with total impunity. Just a few days ago, CJP leader Abhijit Dipke and YouTube commentator Dhruv Rathee were detained—simply because these supposedly neutral bureaucrats and police officers brazenly align themselves with politicians and criminal syndicates to rule the country. While I have encountered documented cases of honest officials, they remain a distinct minority in such an environment. Subconsciously, therefore, I have always harbored a deeply unfavorable impression of Indian officialdom. So whenever former Indian officials or senior researchers adopt a condescending posture, dismissing young Chinese commentators as CCP-controlled AI translate robots, I am invariably reminded of those arrogant, privileged elites and the abysmal atrocities they quietly commit behind closed doors.

You dimwit, Do have FBI, Interpol, CIA, Mossad, KGB, MI5, RAW, IB, NIA, ISI and others investigate, interrogate me, if your stupid remark matters. My work tells facts & I report organized crime real time- Duds like you can only spit humbug. So.. Stop cribbing you retard.

अबोहर, पंजाब: लारेंस बिश्नोई के चचेरे भाई रमेश बिश्नोई ने अभिनेता टाइगर श्रॉफ की गाड़ी पर हुई गोलीबारी की घटना पर कहा, ".. ये बात है कि गुस्सा तो समाज में है। इस बात का बिश्नोई समाज के अंदर गुस्सा है। लॉरेंस भी गुस्सा है, लॉरेंस की सलमान खान से कोई पर्सनल लड़ाई नहीं है, ना कोई समाज की पर्सनल लड़ाई है। एक ही है कि उसने हमारी धार्मिक भावना को ठेस पहुँचाई है। इसका समाज में भी बहुत गुस्सा है। लॉरेंस ने एक सीधा रास्ता निकाल के दिया था कि वो आकर माफी माँग ले..."

The moment has arrived to distinguish between Sidhu Moosewala’s genuine fans and the fake ones. This 'Comrade' lawyer, Navkiran—who hides behind the guise of a Sikh—is absolving the Indian government of blame while painting Sidhu Moosewala as the guilty party. The Indian government could very well orchestrate another untoward incident involving young Sidhu. We know that Sidhu Moosewala’s father cannot secure justice, as he prioritized money and proved to be a cowardly father. If you truly wish to obtain justice, you must rein in people like Navkiran.

RIP Rajvir Jawanda 🙏🏽🕊️ Gone too soon 💔

Mumbai, Maharashtra: On the attack on actor Tiger Shroff, Filmmaker and FWICE Chief Advisor Ashok Pandit says, "I don't want to get into, that area, who has done it. That's for the investigating agencies, that's for the, that's for the police, that's for the Government of Maharashtra to find out the real reason, who are the people involved in this. That's not my work, and it's not my, it's not my expertise, also. But as you rightly said, I personally feel that not only people from this industry, every common man should be protected. Every, common man has a right to live, every common man has a right to be protected with, with, with full dignity. So I personally feel that there has to be some seriousness and on, such issues..."

Y’day, a friend asked why we use the word ‘bastard’ so often in our tweets about godi media and Sanghis. @ANI posted dozens of tweets & statements from Union ministers and the Maharashtra CM on attack involving Tiger Shroff, yet none of these tweets mentions the reported claim of responsibility by ‘designated twrrorist’ Lawrence Bishnoi gang. Is it wrong to call them bastards?

गृहमंत्री अमित शाह के आदेश से अगस्त 2023 में CrPC की धारा 268 के तहत लॉरेंस बिश्नोई को किसी भी राज्य की पुलिस गुजरात से बाहर ले जाकर पूछताछ नहीं कर सकती। ये आदेश हर साल एक वर्ष के लिए बढ़ा दिया जाता है। ये आदेश लॉरेंस को किसी भी तरह के बाहरी खतरे से बचाने के लिए है।

For the first time in the history of India, a criminal sitting in jail able to make number of assassination attempt on celebrities of India.