Clearly a sportball interview, but something to consider: There’s a fine line between players wanting to understand a decision and wanting to engage and argue with it. The one-word answer should often be obvious, and a more elaborate answer can be tough to articulate when it’s actually the umpire who really needs to move on in the moment because 20 other decisions have to immediately be made. More off-pitch work by umpires determining *when* players actually do need clarification and how to deliver; then by players to understand the rules better already would really help in a fast-moving sport like hockey.