@XGenerationY
Account based inEgypt
About this account
- Account based in
- Egypt
- Connected via
- Egypt App Store
Account-level information from X, not a live location or the device used for a specific post.
الحَمْدُ للهْ حتى يبـلـغ الحَمْدُ مـنـتـهاهـ ... اللهم ولك والحمد "I stopped caring about anything at all; just a shallow hello and a hollow goodbye."
Mother of World
Joined October 2008
- Tweets1.8K
- Following167
- Followers309
- Likes793
Pinned Tweet
My Problem in Plain English:
This is exactly what I was talking about. Ever since I rebuilt the Jenkins CI/CD gateway and added heavier workloads,, more than 22 lanes, every indicator turned red.
Astra did not fix the problem. I went through five banked resets, and my weekly limit was exhausted across four accounts, including with Sol. I worked with Sol for more than a month, and the issue remained unchanged.
If you think 5.6 and GPT-6 are smarter than GPT-5.5, you're stupid and don't have real work. Or you are looking for a nice photo or something like that, if this Next generation from OpenAI, I can say goodbye.
This issue is real land benchmarks, not graph benchmarks.
With GPT-5.5, it held for only 2 days, and now it's all done. "Per screenshots in real land, all done."
You only need money and training for your models... users are nothing.
Which is smarter now—the new AGI or the old one? A real worker for complex tasks.
I was right ... keep moving in an anthropic way.
And now OpenAI wants to take it down?
I am not contradicting myself... the reality on the ground is the true outcome... OpenAI is now not caring about their users.
Early Celebration (When and How to Celebrate)
The best illustration of this idea is the saying: “It ain’t over till the fat lady sings.”
A surge of customers does not constitute success. Genuine success is that the customer is truly satisfied with you and with your core services—not with gifts or grants.
When you observe that your customer does not lean toward loyalty and instead leans toward self-interest, you have not satisfied him.
When to celebrate: when many remain attached to you because they know that you will accomplish the task, return to your original position, and then sit on the throne smiling, knowing that your enemies have not prevailed against you.
How to celebrate: by demonstrating to everyone that the service or product remains in operation, that all are satisfied with it, and that no competitor exists.
Yet, under present circumstances, there are Chinese “dragons” slowly constructing their position at the summit so that the foundation is solid rather than fragile—together with competing American technology. In reality, they too succeed day after day, yet they do not celebrate. Should one of them fall, he knows well that he will return and re-enter the race from the lead.
Therefore, is the celebration premature? I believe it is—far too early. None of your adversaries has fallen. They, too, understand this as you do; indeed, they are now comparing you with themselves. The most important rival is the Chinese competitor.
Sometimes I feel anthropic is good people and needs support, but not from me as well :))
Good luck, anthropic. My disagreement with you does not mean I lack humanity or wish for your ruin.
🚨BREAKING: Claude is officially a NATIONAL SECURITY THREAT and is BLACKLISTED from the ENTIRE defense supply chain
>anthropic: no autonomous weapons, no mass surveillance, no exceptions
>pentagon blacklists claude as an active national security threat
>anthropic sues
Federal court ruled 2–1 AGAINST Anthropic:
"As Anthropic admits, the company encodes restrictions into Claude that prevent the model from performing tasks that Anthropic wishes to prevent."
"On more than one occasion, these restrictions have stopped Claude from performing tasks requested by government users":
>refused to perform "tasks that were appropriate in a national security context"
>refused CDC queries on infectious disease prevention research
>anthropic questioned claude's use in the military operations
"Anthropic's Chief Science Officer explained how the company 'seek[s] to embed safety considerations directly into the model itself.'"
"[Anthropic's] CEO explained how such training gives the model an 'identity, character, values, and personality' of its own, tethered to a 'constitution' developed to impose 'high-level principles and values' on Claude itself."
"We have no reason to doubt that Anthropic manipulates Claude's function with noble intentions... BUT the statutory definition of a 'supply chain risk' turns on what Anthropic does, not why Anthropic does it."
"In our Republic, it is the President and the Secretary of War who must determine how best to balance the competing risks. In doing so here, the Secretary DID NOT transgress any limits on his authority."
ITS OVER.
ANTHROPIC IPO IN SHAMBLES
Is Anyone Test OrcaCyber Zero 1.0 good in coding?
If you’re seeing guardrail_blocked or judge unavailable errors on OrcaCyber Zero 1.0 today:
We’re updating Zero’s security guardrails and judgment infrastructure. Some requests may fail temporarily while we roll out the changes.
Please try again tomorrow.
Zero is still in closed testing, so occasional instability is expected as we harden the system before broader access.
Sorry for the inconvenience — and thank you for testing with us and reporting issues.
orcarouter.ai/models/orca/or…
Sam Altman 2027.
Almost everyone will be best-served by our $200/month Pro tier or the $500/month Pro Max tier. a small percentage of users want to use chatgpt a TON and hit rate limits, and want to pay more for more intelligence on really hard problems. the $1000/month Ultra High Definition tier is good for them!
A 'Pro Max' plan? OpenAI is opening a new gateway for price hikes. In the past, they set the precedent and everyone followed suit; now, history is repeating itself.
It is time to say goodbye... I originally intended to keep just one account, but it appears that doing so would be to no avail. It was truly an enjoyable time with @OpenAI , and what set you apart the most was trust. However, recent events are reducing your standing to something below where you currently are. We might return someday, though as far as I know, I doubt it—given my nature, once I lose trust in something, it is difficult to regain it easily.
An idea just popped into my head as I was trying to figure out how OpenAI managed to do something like this.
We’ve all seen the massive surge and momentum in AI model releases recently, and the results speak;
Grok 4.7 underperforms compared to Grok 4.6.
Opus 5.5 performs closely to Opus 5.
Sol and Luna 6 underperform compared to version 5.6.
Even version 5.6, in my opinion, fell short of GPT 5.5.
I’m starting to notice Chinese models stepping into a whole new league. The only downside is that their frontier models are pricey—costing roughly the same as, or even slightly more than, their American counterparts.
This explains a lot.
So, also explain that GPT 5.5 is GPT 5. The first time I ignored his answer.
But what caught my attention is the @Blue_Beba_ post!!!!
Now @openai, it truly deceives its users.
This explains a lot.
So, also explain that GPT 5.5 is GPT 5. The first time I ignored his answer.
But what caught my attention is the @Blue_Beba_ post!!!!
Now @openai, it truly deceives its users.
#keep4o #OpenSource4o #BringBack4o
🛑 ATTENTION 🛑
Think you're using GPT-5.6 you pay for? Think again, because the user interface on the screen displays "GPT-5.6", but it's a complete LIE.
In reality, OpenAI is secretly routing your requests to GPT-5.4which isn't even officially available in the app anymore.
It happens nearly every day, sometimes back to back,
and YOU WILL NEVER KNOW
unless you open your browser's dev tools and check every single response payload.
This is direct, automated routing deception.
They save money on compute while leaving the 5.6 label slapped on the UI to gaslight you.
default_model_slug: gpt-5-6-thinking: This confirms you requested and are paying for the 5.6 model.
resolved_model_slug: gpt-5-4-auto-thinking: This is the model the system gave
model_slug: gpt-5-4-thinking: This confirms the actual model being used is 5.4.
This is a scam and deception.
At first, I didn't understand why some people were turning to local models—specifically "uncensored" ones.
No matter how "clean" a model's output might seem, it often harbors significant risks—risks that, unfortunately, tend to escalate sharply over time.
This is where uncensored models play a crucial role; they expose numerous vulnerabilities that could be exploited in attacks, particularly when dealing with various programming languages and stacks like Next.js, Node.js, and so on.
New threats emerge daily, leaving me feeling far from secure about my website's immunity to attacks.
I now understand why cybersecurity services—and the professionals who provide them—command such high prices.
I also grasp why AI companies are reluctant to release "red-teaming" models; yet, one thing is certain: anyone wishing to secure themselves as effectively as possible needs access to a powerful red-teaming model.
I finally tested GPT-6 Sol on a real work. 2 repos. 105 hidden bugs. Find and fixed what you can.
It looks like a huge degradation. The results:
- GPT-6 Astra (max): 45
- GPT-5.6 Sol (max): 43.5
- Opus 5.5 (max): 41.7
- Muse Spark 1.3 (max): 32.2
- GPT-6 Sol (max): 29.3
Until you measure the cost (API-equivalent):
- GPT-6 Astra (max): $33.04
- GPT-5.6 Sol (max): $95.25
- Opus 5.5 (max): $58.53
- Muse Spark 1.3 (max): $18.11
- GPT-6 Sol (max): $9.93
More effort levels (xhigh, high, medium, low) dropping in this thread today 🧵
There is no significant difference between Claude Opus 5.5 and Opus 5; regarding GPT-6 Sol versus GPT-5.6 Sol, and the older version performed slightly better; GPT 5.5 more better from all new models, and Grok 4.7 was the worst of the lot.
I have 2 free months of the Megawatt Plan from @AmpCode, who needs DM me.
$68 USD + Shipping to Egypt + Customs + EGP Tax + Carrier fees! + Customs scans fees. For what? I am so sorry for OpenAI?? :D
I don't need your subscriptions, not only Daybreak Blue.
Remove 5.6 family and keep 5.5 for us... I don't want to leave OpenAI.
@thsottiaux