🫖☕️

“distinguishing characteristic [of 5GW] is it’s leaderlessness, … The threat would be based on the “ability aboveground groups to raise ideological consciousness [that] can also motivate unaffiliated underground movement radicals” to commit random acts of terror.”

WATCH. Leaders in the House of Singham Refuse to Answer Questions: "This Woman is a Terrorist!" Part 1 of our @FoxNews Digital investigative series shows you the structure in the House of Singham: $278M from Singham ➡️ 5 Rings ➡️ 2,000 Groups The groups include CodePink, People's Forum, BreakThrough News and IFCO Inc., which sent Medea Benjamin, Jodie Evans and others to Cuba this past week for a very controversial "convoy" that stayed in 5-star hotels while Cubans live in poverty in the communist-led country. Part 2, just out now, answers the next question: How does the House of Singham actually operate? What we found goes beyond activism — into finance, ideology and global alignment of groups into a "United Front," just like Mao Zedong taught communist revolutionaries to create to wage a "Peoples' War." READ: foxnews.com/politics/red-wea… Thank you to @P_Kallioniemi @DataRepublican @michaeldweiss @marklevinshow @XVanFleet and so many others for sharing our investigation. Awareness is a critical element of innoculation from influence operations. This new video by the incredibly talente captures the network in action: with Nik, I walked up to the front door of the People's Forum — a hub for the House of Singham — and there I met network leaders Brian Becker, Manolo De Los Santos and Becker's son, Ben Becker. They refused to answer questions about funding. With nonprofit missions for social justice and charity, they tried to berate me and, at one point, Becker looked over at me and told the building manager, "This woman is a terrorist!" The manager laughed. Becker doubled down. "I'm serious. I'm not joking." What do you think their demeanor and response reveals about their operations? Remember, the Beckers and De Los Santos lead organizations in the House of Singham that are federal nonprofits, which means they receive tax-deductible donations and don't pay many taxes. Do you think it's appropriate for nonprofit leaders to operate with such opaqueness? Critics say that at a minimum there should be more transparency surrounding their funding and operations. This is what I learned they have created: 🟥 A Mao-inspired “United Front,” aligning activists, media and nonprofits across borders to activate actions like the Cuba convoys this past week 🟥 $278M deployed by Singham into a layered network that operates as one system, while organizations use hotels and PO Boxes as addresses 🟥 Direct overlap between the House of Singham and a China state-linked investment vehicle That last point matters: 🟥 A Singham-funded nonprofit, the People’s Support Foundation, has invested for years in a partnership betwen Goldman Sachs and the China Investment Corporation, the Chinese Communist Party's official state investment arm 🟥 In its 2019 tax filing, the People’s Support Foundation disclosed a $75,165 holding, and by 2024, the holding had grown to $410,484 🟥 Goldman Sachs spokesman Tony Fratto told me those investments were legal and "intended to increase foreign direct investment in the United States" In 2019, that partnership purchased Boyd Corporation, a California-based manufacturer. It's a major signal: U.S. nonprofit money intersecting with Chinese state capital. At the same time: CodePink and People’s Forum activists just traveled to Cuba, backing a pro-China communist regime during blackouts and crisis. That’s not a side story. This is how ideology → funding → action connects. And the model behind it isn’t new. It’s Mao Zedong. In 1944, Mao said, "For this struggle a broad united front is indispensable." To understand it, go back in history to Cuba: 🟥 1966 — Cuban leader Fidel Castro convenes the Tricontinental Conference in Havana with communist revolutionaries from Africa, Asia and Latin America under one banner 🟥 Castro makes a pledge to support “any revolutionary movement in any corner of the earth” 🟥 A strategy emerges to unify movements across borders to challenge U.S. "imperialism" and the West Now fast forward: At a People’s Forum event this year: 🟥 SIngham's friend and fellow Marxist ideologue Vijay Prashad releases a book on the 1966 conference through a House of Singham nonprofit he leads named for the conference, Tricontinental Ltd. 🟥 Prashad praises the 1966 revolutionaries and says: “We believe strongly that communism is the actual movement of history” 🟥 De Los Santos says the 1966 revolutionaires "weren't armchair leftists," who were "shifting from one hotel to the other doing international left tourism" That's a curious observation. De Los Santos was part of the convoy to Cuba this past week, hanging out with CodePink cofounders Medea Benjamin and Jodie Evans, who married Singham in 2017. That continuum — from Mao 1934 → from Havana 1966 → NYC today → Cuba this week — is the story. What are you left wondering?