Wrong on all counts and analogies. AI tech is nowhere near the level where AI can learn by observing, absorbing and learning....bruh. It's only copy pasting from the data fed into it, working within set rules and algorithms. Using AI is the equivalent of hiring a proxy artist.

You don't seem to understand the difference between a person drawing/designing and an AI. AI is Artificial Intelligence, not just a "tool". It's output is what IT imagines YOU want. That is no different from using a proxy human artist to do YOUR art. AI is a digital brain.

So, did you design the armour? Of course not. The AI just pastes patches from the data it already has/learnt, and what it thinks an armour should look like. Does this look cool? YES. But, it is STILL SLOP because the AI did the THINKING.

Exactly. And you don't see the problem here? If I can make and watch my own movies, then why would I pay or buy from someone else?

No...it's people who use AI for slop and who call themselves "artist", without ever having an artistic incline or qualifications, who are the problem. AI designed to automate certain processes is good. AI in the hands of everyone, is an economic disaster.

What makes you think that every one is rich in China? If that's the impression you got, then you need to reevaluate your IQ. Booming economy doesn't equate to everyone being rich or well off. Not that hard to figure out, is it? ..er may be it is, looking at your mugshot.

Good question. Now think whether the Chinese actually do this or whether they are posting these types of videos for clicks? Are they carrying multiple plastic sheets with them for each bite? Lol. Come on... stop believing everything you see.

Earthquakes. It's easier to repair overhead lines.

The way things are moving, government censors will cripple AI before it even gets to that point. XAi learnt this the hard way.

U have no clue what art is. Writing a prompt & letting the AI generate dozens of variations for u to choose from is NOT art, nor ur imagination. Ur only contributions r the basic guidelines in the prompt. About shadows, lighting, perspective, architecture, biology, u r clueless.

As someone who does reprographics. It's a pain in the ass when a clueless moron generates AI art and expects it to be vectorised, without understanding the inconsistent slop that he has generated. This issue does not arise with human created art and designs.

Is that a man?

The way they are trying to justify AI is on another level. These are the people that LACK artistic skills to do anything, be it art or photography. And it is this sense of inferiority complex and incompleteness that forces them to piggyback on AI, to gain "parity" of sorts..lol.

Japan isn't allowing that thankfully. Any AI tool must ensure that it's not trained on copyrighted material, that's what the Japanese said. Apart from that, Artists are supposed to demonstrate their drawing abilities live, during interviews. So no prompt-engineering clowns.

ChatGPT and Gemini users are not posting bikini deepfakes on SNS in realtime, like X. It's as simple as, you want to humiliate someone, Grok put a bikini on her. And then there are those that are pervs. SNS makes it widespread and copycats proliferate. That is the problem.

Did they get Van der hag?

That is EXACTLY the problem. If AI replaces everything, what are people going to do? Have u ever thought about that? The only jobs left will be prompt engineers & eventually they too will get phased out. Sooner or later, governments will have to restrict AI, it is inevitable.

Europeans were called " Red " skinned.

It gives me the creeps, specifically that hand. Dough with holes also gives me the creeps, though that has lessened since I grew older. I still wouldn't touch it.

You can't gain something that you aren't wired for. Or else everyone would have been Michelangelo or Leonardo. Artistry & artistic skills r peculiar to individuals. Throwing in some prompts without the knowledge of architecture, perspective, lighting or human biology isn't art.