Ideology is a tool, to say nothing of the people who adhere to it.
Joined May 2021
- Tweets7.7K
- Following60
- Followers216
- Likes3.2K
"election meddling"
"Accuse your enemy of doing what you are doing" -Saul Alinsky, Rules for Radicals
As many of you know, in recent days Data Republican has been releasing transcripts, videos and audio recordings of a group of groups plotting to use violence to force President Trump to take protective actions (i.e., the Insurrection Act) that will result in the overthrow of our Constitution in favor of the will of Democrat governors.
These groups include former USAID employees and other ex-national security officials, and the plans they discuss are straight out of the color revolution tactics, techniques and procedures those same people have been using for decades to overthrow foreign governments unfriendly to the USA.
This is the biggest news story in decades, right?
Yet no one in the mainstream media will touch it.
Except to defend it.
See the below headline from today’s Washington Post (I’ll link to the full article below).
The plotters behind this effort are obviously alarmed by the recent public uncovering of their conspiracy, so they have done what any reputable Democrat determined to overthrow the electoral choices of the American people would do: run to a friendly press outlet to drop a soft-pedaled puff piece to run top cover for their efforts, and blame Trump.
If you read this article, it does not talk about a coup conspiracy. Instead it talks about a bunch of well-meaning, patriotic, anonymous ex-national security officials simply trying to protect America from the evil dictator Trump destroying “our democracy.”
This article itself is straight out of the color revolution tactics—it’s propaganda designed to condition a populace to accept illegitimate actions.
The Washington Post is part of the plot.
Stay frosty, friends. This will get worse before it gets better.
Talk about a complete misunderstanding of the movement, the attraction to it, what it stands against, why and how.
Complete failure of knowing the other side, out of ego and projection.
MAGA was never about intellectual arguments. It's identity politics.
“There is an entire MAGA industrial complex that has risen up in the Trump era that thinks it has permanently won arguments, when it has really just drafted behind Trump and Trumpism. They’ve pushed through open doors and doors knocked off their hinges by Trump, and think they’ve won an intellectual argument. But the midterms look poised to deal a massive blow to that, in part because their arguments for protectionism, industrial policy, and mass deportation have not yielded anything like the “golden age” that was promised. I find the idea that these guys—the self-styled intellectuals, the jabroni remora apparatchiks, and the get-rich-while-the-getting-is-good grifters, alike—will be well situated to win arguments on the right or anywhere else in the post-Trump era very implausible. Because the record of their tenure, in terms of policy and politics, won’t look like a golden age to anybody.”
- @JonahDispatch
So @grok doesn't this kind of activity constitution treasonous or at least seditious conspiracy?
How is this kind of activity not actionable and anyone linked to it not able to just be summarily rounded up?
Seems pretty insane to allow this kind of thing to fester...
It seems @DataRepublican has discovered that the Dems & DSA communists have been working on very specific and detailed plans for instigating a coup / regime change / civil war in the U.S. after next month's midterm elections:
< Leading Dems are hatching up the following strategy:
1. After the midterms, use the DSA to incite and carry out violent civil unrest.
2. Make the violent civil unrest so bad that Trump must invoke the Insurrection Act.
3. Use the invocation of the Insurrection Act to create a national sense of illegitimacy.
4. Dem governors will then appear justified in taking the extreme action of refusing to acknowledge federal authority.
5. Push to form a new "legitimate" federal government via various means, including an Article V transformation of the Constitution. >
If someone doesn't mention:
- DPR 2014 - 2022
- Crimea 2014
- Kazakhstan 2022
They aren't serious about understanding the proximate causes of the war.
They might have a better than average grasp.
Notice I didn't even mention NATO.
Because that doesn't differentiate at all.
Will they actually draw the line here?
Guarantee burning the Louvre is a top target for several groups of young men.
This line will be tested.
And if I had to bet, I'd bet it gets sacked.
French police warned protesters: "If you approach the Louvre Museum in Paris, we will open fire!"
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
French police issued no such warning to open fire near the Louvre. Coverage of the Oct 17-19 protests details non-lethal crowd control like tear gas amid clashes and a small peaceful student blockade of the museum.
thelocal.fr/20261019/prote…
lemonde.fr/societe/live/2…
leparisien.fr/societe/direct…
Every time you're arguing or discussing with a liberal and they do that feigned ignorance thing, this is where it comes from.
Shows like this train them how to respond.
They feign a desire for accuracy, nuance, sources, etc.
In reality they're just parroting a script.
🚨 WOW! 60 Minutes just tried telling Americans to IGNORE noncitizen voting because it's "rare," and AAG Harmeet Dhillon took NONE of that BS
HOST: It could sow distrust! 🤡
DHILLON: The point is actually the OPPOSITE of what you're saying. It's not to sow distrust. The distrust is THERE! All of these kinds of crimes are being prosecuted now for the first time in VOLUME.
👏🏻👏🏻
We can't keep letting the fake news talk down to us like we should be OK US citizens' votes get canceled out...
The DOJ sued California for allegedly mailing ballots to more than 20,000 likely noncitizens in the 2026 elections.
And 30 states are refusing to turn over their full voter rolls, so the DOJ sued every one of them!
If it's so "rare," why are they fighting this hard to keep anyone from checking?!
Reminder that the US Constitution provides no right to protest.
- peaceful assembly
- petition for redress of grievances
Protesting is not a right.
William™ retweeted
J’ai entendu dire que la France était finie, qu’il était trop tard pour la sauver.
Mais la France est toujours aussi belle, enviable même. Sa grandeur n’a pas disparu, elle ne demande qu’à renaître.
Nous avons surmonté en un an un problème cent fois plus grave, sans avoir les moyens dont dispose la France.
La France pourrait y arriver en une semaine.
It is unfortunate that most people need to be personally impacted for something to become real to them.
This is why those of us who know anything of history have been urging for civil reforms, including mass deportations and denaturalizations.
Would that be painful? Yes.
Medicine is rarely pleasant.
We're trying to avoid the massive violent reaction to this.
The longer the medicine is delayed, the more likely there will be a need for surgery.
And it will not be minimally invasive.
I was just thinking this after seeing a comment about how the boost can recharge...
...refresh my feed and this is the top post.
@x how do you do it?
Didn't we used to draw and quarter traitors?
When the folks complaining about the pending public execution start calling for shutting down pornography I'll take them seriously...
...and again it's the "oh you Christians, let me tell you your morality so you can be defanged and I can rule you" nonsense.
Yeah, ok. Let's go there.
Jesus flooded the earth.
Jesus ejected Adam and Eve, literally condemning all of us to death.
That's our theology, no matter what the Chicago Roman Pretender wants to say. Which is odd, who put him up to it? Where was he as Christians were massacred in Africa?
I saw someone make this point, and I agree: If some Christian right winger zealot did the same thing, I doubt he would be making a stink about the public execution.
And I hate to say it. Lord help me if I'm wrong. I think he's playing democratic politics, which offends his office. Stirring up the common man for the purposes of ideology is beneath the clergy. It's abhorrent. Disgusting.
I hope I'm wrong, and if so, may I be corrected. Not kidding. I don't write that lightly, even if it is against the Pope, as an Orthodox Christian I'm still respectful of my RC brothers and respect the office. Yet he seems to be profaning against it.... End of apologetic digresson.
Personally, sure, I don't like it. I don't know why, maybe it's because I was raised in Gay Madison, WI. Maybe it's because I think it would be martyrdom material and a snuff film, and doesn't add anything to a live event.
SERIOUSLY. If it were me making the call, I'm not livestreaming it. Wtf. Really?
If anything, maybe give out free tickets and not limit anyone from taking video on their own phones.
That's my personal opinion. But whatever why does that matter. Feminized "you must have an opinion" culture? Meh. I'm one guy.
And yeah, I'm one guy observing things... but here it is...
The cultural observation I'm seeing is another litmus test telling me that our country is full of stupid theatre kids making monkey noises and claiming it's sensible.
And this is where I'm inclined to say that military dictatorship is in order, because most folks should be taught to shut the f up and learn how to fold their underwear, get yelled at, and lower the average BMI by doing lots of pushups. But, again, whatever...
...and oh yeah maybewe should add some dress codes in the gymnasiums while we're at it.
Oh and also
We used to draw and quarter traitors
So why is everyone complaining?
You know what the worst outcome is?
Meh.
If it does go through and the firing squad gets livetreamed....
...you know what I bet will happen?
Meh.
Like, that's the reaction.
Lots of people will see a guy just slump.
And they'll be disappointed.
That's actually the worst possible outcome.
Because they might want more.
Why do you think the Roman crowds wanted to see a criminal torn apart by lions?
Why do you think we used to draw and quarter traitors?
People wanted to see the begging, the anticipation, the action.
They got that way because they wanted to see "justice" in front of them.
That's the intuition, I think, that I haven't seen expressed.
That's the snowball, that I think I don't want to see start rolling.
It's got nothing to do with Christian doctrine for or against the death penalty. For we all must die, so that is a silly argument.
No.
It is for the setting in motion of a bloodthirsty culture of justice meeted out in increasingly cruel means.
And, in our post-Christian culture, it is totally possible to get there.
The doors are open.
I'd prefer we not step through.
Instead, I'd prefer he be drawn and quartered privately. As the traitor is is.