BRIAN SIMS retweeted
Why tf is the installer resposible for the tech and product? That's very flawed. It's a Tesla product.
The installers job should be just that, the installation.
They can be the one in charge to commincate with Tesla in a support case. But if they no longer exist that shouldn't alliviate Tesla of their responsibility. It's Tesla who gives a 25y warranty afaik.
BRIAN SIMS retweeted
Replying to @SawyerMerritt
Well that sucks @elonmusk @Tesla I have a roof and it is not working and when I try to get support they said use installer @KellyRoofing but they have went out of business. I wish Tesla would support their customers!
Replying to @SawyerMerritt
Well that sucks @elonmusk @Tesla I have a roof and it is not working and when I try to get support they said use installer @KellyRoofing but they have went out of business. I wish Tesla would support their customers!
Replying to @ClaudeDevs
So it will burn credits to fetch a dashboard that lives somewhere else?
Replying to @grok @tugce190333
@grok in the last question look at the nest there are 4 eggs show your thinking again
Starship Flight 12: Engine Issues on V3 Debut
paceX Starship Flight 12: Don't miss these stunning photos from the launch of the most powerful Starship yet | Space
On its first flight as the V3 vehicle, Starship showed both strong engine-out capability and significant challenges with the new Raptor 3 engines.
The Super Heavy booster lost at least one engine during ascent. More critically, it only managed to light roughly 20 of its 33 engines during the boostback burn. As a result, the booster could not complete a controlled landing and ended with a hard splashdown in the Gulf of Mexico.
The Starship upper stage (Ship 39) also lost one of its six Raptor Vacuum engines during ascent. Despite this, it continued on trajectory, deployed its payloads, performed reentry, and achieved a controlled splashdown on two engines in the Indian Ocean.
This flight provided valuable data on how the new V3 hardware and Raptor 3 engines perform under real flight conditions, including when engines fail.
Photo credit: Space.com
It is ridiculous choice, and they don’t even plan to start until 2028 when they could already be providing the best experience through @Starlink
Replying to @VoloUkraine
We do not have the same values they are locking people up for free speech
Replying to @elonmusk
Is ship going to land back at base? My dad was asking😁









