“Well, Patrick said.” The investigation started with one man’s story. Evidence was interpreted through it. That’s confirmation bias. $PATRICK
Plymouth Superior Court
Joined August 2009
- Tweets76
- Following72
- Followers30
- Likes94
New track just dropped.
“Patrick said. But who investigated Patrick?”
suno.com/s/c41y6rPqb3bED6Hd
Patrick Said retweeted
Expert witness for prosecution: “Well, Patrick said.”
Literally Everyone Else: “But the math ain’t mathin.”
🤖 Made with AI
Well, Patrick said.
But, maybe not.
$PATRICK HwucUN8zRncgxYJy55nJD1eDL5RfDtgywFLyvcDTpump
Expert witness for prosecution: “Well, Patrick said.”
Literally Everyone Else: “But the math ain’t mathin.”
🤖 Made with AI
It’s no longer “Simon Says”. It’s “Patrick says”.
$PATRICK HwucUN8zRncgxYJy55nJD1eDL5RfDtgywFLyvcDTpump
if I had turned "patrick said" into a drinking game I'd have been blackout drunk for 3 weeks.
$PATRICK HwucUN8zRncgxYJy55nJD1eDL5RfDtgywFLyvcDTpump
Full compilation below.
Patrick Said retweeted
Lindsay Clancy‘s judge just had to remind the jury what “reasonable doubt” means — and that the burden of proof belongs to the prosecution.
Apparently, “Well, Patrick said” isn’t the standard.
Well, Patrick said.
And then they wrote that shit down.
And then it was evidence.
And now, reasonable doubt for Lindsay Clancy.
$PATRICK HwucUN8zRncgxYJy55nJD1eDL5RfDtgywFLyvcDTpump
11–1. One holdout. The judge reiterating reasonable doubt.
If 11 jurors aren’t buying the prosecution’s case, “Well, Patrick said” just became one hell of a thesis.
$PATRICK HwucUN8zRncgxYJy55nJD1eDL5RfDtgywFLyvcDTpump
Redd’s a GOAT 🤣
The “Well, Patrick said.” argument was never gonna hold up in court.
That’s like the definition of Reasonable Doubt.
$PATRICK HwucUN8zRncgxYJy55nJD1eDL5RfDtgywFLyvcDTpump
Patrick Said retweeted
I asked Lindsay Clancy’s attorney if he wants a new juror or a mistrial. He responded “i don’t want a mistrial. Why would I want a mistrial? I’m beating the shit out of their case.”
It’s apparently 11–1.
One holdout juror. And the judge just had to remind the jury that the burden is on the prosecution — and if reasonable doubt remains, the defendant gets the benefit of it.
Apparently, “Well, Patrick said” still isn’t enough.
Lindsay Clancy‘s judge just had to remind the jury what “reasonable doubt” means — and that the burden of proof belongs to the prosecution.
Apparently, “Well, Patrick said” isn’t the standard.
Well, Patrick said.
And then they wrote that shit down.
And then it was evidence.
And now, reasonable doubt for Lindsay Clancy.
$PATRICK HwucUN8zRncgxYJy55nJD1eDL5RfDtgywFLyvcDTpump
Patrick Said retweeted
Well, Patrick said.
And then they wrote that shit down.
And then it was evidence.
And now, reasonable doubt for Lindsay Clancy.
$PATRICK HwucUN8zRncgxYJy55nJD1eDL5RfDtgywFLyvcDTpump
“Well, Patrick said.” -reasonable doubt
$PATRICK
HwucUN8zRncgxYJy55nJD1eDL5RfDtgywFLyvcDTpump
pump.fun/callouts/HwucUN8zRn…
“Well, Patrick said.”
The phrase taking over the side of the Lindsay Clancy trial that isn’t buying the accepted narrative.
So many key details were accepted early, then investigated as fact as witness at trial.
“How do we actually know that?”
Well, Patrick said.
$PATRICK
