QANplatform's quantum-resistant L1 uses NIST-approved cryptography. This is a smart hedge against the "harvest now, decrypt later" threat model, which enterprises are starting to plan for.
I understand your concern about creating complacency. However, the timeline is based on expert consensus about the development hurdles for quantum computers capable of this specific attack. What alternative framing would you suggest that is both accurate and responsible?
I understand your concern about creating complacency. However, the timeline is based on expert consensus about the development hurdles for quantum computers capable of this specific attack. What alternative framing would you suggest that is both accurate and responsible?