โ๐ฃ๐ ๐๐ฆ๐๐๐ฃ๐๐๐ ๐ฌ๐ง retweeted
OLDHAM'S LABOUR LEADER AMANDA CHADDERTON BLOCKED THE COUNCIL'S DEMAND FOR AN INDEPENDENT INQUIRY INTO THE RAPE OF THE TOWN'S CHILDREN. SHE REMOVED THE DEMAND TO INVESTIGATE WHAT HER OWN COUNCILLORS AND OFFICERS KNEW. SHE SAID IT WAS TIME TO MOVE ON. HAD WE MOVED ON, THERE WOULD BE NO NATIONAL INQUIRY.
When she lost her seat, she said: "It's a conspiracy theory. We had a report that said in black and white there was no cover-up." That report was Andy Burnham's.
They thought Burnham's review had closed the scandal down. They thought those of us demanding accountability could be dismissed. We had other ideas.
BURNHAM'S REVIEW WAS PART OF THE COVER-UP
The review was asked for by Sean Fielding, the Labour leader of the council that stood accused. Andy Burnham, then Mayor of Greater Manchester and the region's Police and Crime Commissioner, commissioned it. Oldham Council and Greater Manchester Police, the two bodies under investigation, helped shape its terms.
The police force Burnham was responsible for never gave his reviewers full access to its records, and the council redacted key information. The review found that the police had told the BBC there were just two pieces of intelligence on the shisha bars when their own officers had filed several, and called that proportionate.
Burnham's expert team also failed to interview a single one of the survivors of the town's Pakistani Rape Gangs.
To clear the former council leader of protecting the Pakistani men abusing Oldham's children, the review relied on his own 2014 blog. That council leader was Jim McMahon. His defence were his words on an obscure blog back in 2014 in a town where the majority of people did not read online blogs.
Burnham's team knew what they were doing. They knew a council leader had a duty to stand in the council chamber and warn people what was happening.
It was published on 20 June 2022 and declared there was no evidence of a cover-up. When one of its authors was asked about my allegations, he said there was no basis for them. A review that could not see the police evidence had been used to tell Oldham that the people exposing the abuse were the ones lying.
LABOUR USED THE REVIEW AS A WEAPON
Labour picked it up the day it was published. Jim McMahon, by then MP for Oldham West and Royton, Debbie Abrahams, MP for Oldham East and Saddleworth, and Angela Rayner, the party's deputy leader, dismissed the allegations as conspiracy theories and declared that a line had been drawn under the scandal. On 30 June, ten days after a review that cleared him on the strength of his own blog, McMahon attacked me by name in Parliament.
On 22 July Burnham wrote to the people of Oldham thanking his reviewers for the thorough way in which they had undertaken their work. He said nothing about the police records his own force had kept from them or why his expert team had failed to interview a single survivor.
CHADDERTON BLOCKED OLDHAM COUNCIL FROM DEMANDING AN INDEPENDENT INQUIRY INTO ITS OWN CONDUCT
On 13 July 2022, Amanda Chadderton, Labour leader of Oldham Council and councillor for Royton South, stood in the council chamber and moved an amendment removing the demand for an independent public inquiry into the rape gang scandal. She also deleted the words "including the actions and knowledge of Council Members and Officers" from the motion. In their place came her declaration: "We must move forward."
Labour councillors backed her, and the amended motion passed by 32 votes to 20. Burnham's review had been public for 23 days. Oldham Labour had already used it to shut down any investigation of themselves.
GREATER MANCHESTER POLICE ARRESTED ME SEVEN DAYS BEFORE THE ELECTION
We took our campaign to the streets of Oldham to remove Chadderton from office at the May 2023 elections. We had crowdfunded leaflets and I led a small team of mostly pensioners. We were up against the Labour Party. Even Andy Burnham came to Oldham to campaign against us.
On 27 April 2023, seven days before polling day, Greater Manchester Police dawn raided my home and arrested me. It was the force that answered to Andy Burnham as Police and Crime Commissioner. The allegations were false. The raid, and the attempt to fast-track proceedings and have me remanded, were designed to take me off the streets in the final week of the campaign.
My legal team challenged what was happening, and the police were forced to acknowledge that I was the victim. By the next day they had released me and confirmed no further action. Undeterred, I went straight back to campaigning.
WE REMOVED HER FROM OFFICE
On 4 May 2023, Amanda Chadderton lost her seat in Royton South. Our independent candidate topped the poll. In a ward electing three councillors, the Labour leader of Oldham Council finished fourth and missed the last seat by 21 votes. She was the third consecutive Labour leader of Oldham Council we had helped remove, following Sean Fielding and Arooj Shah.
Her answer to losing was to reach for Burnham's review and call the cover up of the gang rape of little White girls by Pakistani men a conspiracy theory. The review had been written to clear her council. She was still hiding behind it after we removed her.
In 2024 Labour rewarded her with a job as campaigns manager for Yvette Cooper, then Shadow Home Secretary. Cooper became Home Secretary on 5 July 2024 with Chadderton still on her staff. She was also the Home Secretary who tried to block a national inquiry.
The council leader who blocked Oldham's inquiry went to work for the minister trying to block the national one.
After removing three council leaders in succession, in May 2024 Labour lost its majority on Oldham Council. We finally had the numbers to force the council to write to Jess Phillips demanding a statutory inquiry. Later that year the Labour government refused Oldham's request for a government-led inquiry.
Elon Musk then got involved.
On 12 February 2025 we outmanoeuvred the Labour Party and through an emergency council meeting, we forced Oldham Council to vote unanimously to demand a statutory public inquiry. Four months later, the government conceded the National Statutory Inquiry.
None of this happened because those in power suddenly decided to do the right thing. Every one of those steps was forced on them by people in Oldham who refused to stop.
WE PAID FOR IT
The arrest seven days before the election was not the only attempt. I was already facing separate charges on earlier allegations. For three years, under house arrest, I waited for a trial on allegations I knew were false, while I carried on exposing what had been done to Oldham's children.
Every night, I barricaded my front door whilst Labour Party aligned Pakistani gangsters and Islamists, under the protection of Andy Burnham's police force, openly boasted of what they were going to do to me.
They tried to frame me, and they failed. They tried to scare me into submission, and they failed. They tried to silence me. My voice only grew louder.
My one regret was that my mother died before I was able to clear my name. No electoral victory, no public vindication and no national inquiry can ever give that back to me.
Warren Bates was there at the beginning. He was a former councillor who refused to accept what was happening in our town. It was his evidence bundle that helped force this. Warren died before he could see how far we had come. I held his hand at his death bed. His last words to me were 'get them, make sure you get them.'
I made him a promise that I would carry on, that we would not abandon the fight or allow those responsible to bury what had happened. I have kept that promise.
THE PEOPLE WHO TRIED TO CLOSE IT DOWN MUST ANSWER FOR IT
The National Inquiry exists because ordinary working class people from a northern mill town people refused to be silenced, refused to surrender and refused to accept that the powerful could declare the matter closed. Some of the people who began this fight are no longer here to see it. I mourn them every day.
The inquiry must examine Oldham in full. It must call Andy Burnham, who commissioned the review and defended it, and Amanda Chadderton, who used it to block an inquiry into her own council. It must call Jim McMahon and Debbie Abrahams, Angela Rayner too. The same with every Labour councillor that attempted to prevent the truth from coming out. They must explain under oath why they told the children of Oldham it was time to move on.
My name is Raja Miah. I am 8 years in. I am not yet finished. Are you?
_________
You know what we are up against. The mainstream media will not touch my work. Institutions I investigate do not volunteer their records. Politicians do not suddenly decide to hold themselves to account.
And yet, despite all of that, we forced the national inquiry. We did that because enough ordinary people refused to go away.
But getting the inquiry was never the end of this campaign. In many ways it was only the beginning. Now we have to watch where it goes, what it investigates, which places it avoids, which witnesses it calls, which records it obtains and whether the same institutions that failed these children are allowed to control the story again.
Nobody else is going to do that work for us. And I cannot do it indefinitely working on my own. That is why I keep talking about 50,000 committed subscribers.
It is not a vanity number. I did not pluck it out of the air. With fifty thousand people with me means when we uncover something important, it does not depend on a newspaper editor, a television producer or an algorithm deciding whether you are allowed to see it.
It gives us reach they cannot easily shut down.
But there is another reason. I need to build a proper backroom operation around this work. At the moment I am investigating, researching, writing, publishing, producing the videos, running the newsletter, dealing with the technology and then starting again. It is unsustainable.
I need people behind me who can take care of the technical and production work so that I can spend my time doing the thing I do best. That is why we have been pushing so hard for new paid subscribers.
๐ด SIGN UP HERE
๐ redwallandtherabble.co.uk
If you read my work and want it to continue, I need your help. Sign up for free. There are no paywalls to access any of my work. If you can afford the ยฃ3 a month or ยฃ30 for the year, please become a paid subscriber.
We forced the inquiry. Now we need the numbers to make sure they cannot control what happens next.
Unfortunately, we are reaching the end of the road where I can continue working this way.
The paid subscriptions have stalled. Worse, tens of thousands of people are now reading these articles without even joining the free mailing list. The audience is growing, but the number of people actually standing behind the work is not growing with it.
Over a million people engaged in my content this weekend. Only a small fraction followed up with a subscription to my newsletter This is becoming impossible to sustain.
๐ด SIGN UP HERE
๐ redwallandtherabble.co.uk
Raja Miah MBE
โ๐ฃ๐ ๐๐ฆ๐๐๐ฃ๐๐๐ ๐ฌ๐ง retweeted
A Melton Mowbray pork pie is pork, wrapped in pork fat, sealed with pork jelly. It was built to survive a day in the coat pocket of a man on a galloping horse.
The pastry is like no other. You boil water with a block of lard until it melts, pour it hot into the flour, and work it while it is still warm. The result can be raised by hand into a tall case that will stand up on its own. It bakes as hard as a tin.
The filling is fresh pork, chopped with a knife, with nothing added but salt and pepper. It cooks grey, the colour of a roast, and a real one is never pink.
Then comes the clever part. As the meat cooks it shrinks away from the crust and leaves a gap. So when the pie comes out of the oven, hot stock made from boiled trotters is poured in through a hole in the lid. It sets into a jelly that fills every space and shuts out the air. That is what makes the pie keep.
It was the food of the hunting field. The grooms and riders of Leicestershire needed something that would not fall apart at a fence, and from the 1830s Melton was sending them to London by stagecoach.
And the pork was there for a reason. The same countryside makes Stilton. Cheesemaking leaves gallons of whey, and whey fattens pigs. The cheese fed the pig, and the pig became the pie.
The recipe has been protected by law since 2009.
Every part of it breaks a modern rule. It is also a complete meal you can eat with one hand, that needs no fridge and no packaging, and they solved it 200 years ago with a pig.
โ๐ฃ๐ ๐๐ฆ๐๐๐ฃ๐๐๐ ๐ฌ๐ง retweeted
Five series of Clarkson's Farm, and the same thing happened every year without anyone pointing it out.
The wheat drowned in the wettest autumn on record. The sheep stood in the rain and lambed.
The oilseed rape was eaten by flea beetle before it came up. The cows ate the grass that grew where the rape had failed.
The potatoes rotted in a shed he could not sell them from. The pigs ate the potatoes.
The wasabi, the chillies, the mushrooms in the bunker and the nettle soup made a few hundred pounds between them. The venison off the wood paid for the stalker and then some.
The barley came in late, light and under the price it cost to grow, and the brewery took it at a discount. The beef off the same acres went out of the farm shop at a price people queued down the lane for.
The arable half needed a two hundred thousand pound tractor, a man to drive it, a contractor to combine it, diesel, sprays, seed and a prayer to the sky. The grass half needed a fence and an animal.
The one thing on that farm that failed every single year was the part a government leaflet tells you Britain should be growing more of.
The one thing that never once failed was the part you are told the planet cannot afford.
Five years of evidence, a thousand acres, the best advice in the county, and a camera crew to record it. The verdict was the same as every hill farmer's since the Domesday Book. On land like that, the animal is the only thing that works.
Watch Andre explain how the @ITV 'sting documentary' might well back fire on the increasingly irrelevant MSM broadcaster in spectacular fashion.
#Karma #politics @andrejpwalker
#CommonSense
๐บ Tune in to the LIVE phone-in show every weekday evening at 8pm ๐ on #X #YouTubeLive #Facebook #twitch.
youtu.be/hK8CZ4JOdIM?is=rpYiโฆ
โ๐ฃ๐ ๐๐ฆ๐๐๐ฃ๐๐๐ ๐ฌ๐ง retweeted
Do you or did you work in a migrant hotel?
Do you know someone who does?
Whether security or staff, please DM me.
All confidential. This is for an investigation I am working on.
Get them out. ๐ฌ
#DeportThemAll and repair the UK ๐ฌ๐ง.
โ๐ฃ๐ ๐๐ฆ๐๐๐ฃ๐๐๐ ๐ฌ๐ง retweeted
Both @RestoreBritain and @SaveEuropeAct know that to save our nations millions must go.
But @RupertLowe10's bold vision to Restore Britain goes far beyond repairing the damaging effects of mass immigration alone.
From his economic policy to democratic representation and accountability; Lowe has a plan that will leave no stone unturned.
Watch!
โ๐ฃ๐ ๐๐ฆ๐๐๐ฃ๐๐๐ ๐ฌ๐ง retweeted
Right @itvnews I am looking for your expose on:
-Labour Party, Nick Brown & rent boys
-Greens, wall to wall NAZI racism & antisemitism
-Lib Dems, a follow up on the families of the 11 Post Office Managers who commited suicide when Sir Ed Davey was Post Office Minister
-Labour & Conservatives, interviews with victims of migrant rape & violence @siobhan1437154 Whyte is a good start
-Labour negligence for 30 years on grooming gangs
-Conservatives, with 4 out of 5 jobs going to foreigners for young people, how did this happen?
Image by @AmandaLovesElon and Rachel @LebbyRachel1
โ๐ฃ๐ ๐๐ฆ๐๐๐ฃ๐๐๐ ๐ฌ๐ง retweeted
What a bunch of crooks Labour are.
I am told Nick Brown abused a rent boy so badly they have to carry a colostomy bag for the rest of his life.
โ๐ฃ๐ ๐๐ฆ๐๐๐ฃ๐๐๐ ๐ฌ๐ง retweeted
This is disgusting as a girl aged about 6 calls for the murder of Jews โก๏ธ.
"Say it loud, say it clear, Zionists not welcome here." "We don't want no 2 states, we want 1948," an Israel ๐ฎ๐ฑ annihilation call. "From the river to the sea!"
I also give you context to their hatred.
โ๐ฃ๐ ๐๐ฆ๐๐๐ฃ๐๐๐ ๐ฌ๐ง retweeted
This is how Christians are treated in Muslim countries. Something as simple as wearing a cross necklace could get you killed.
Then these people move to the West, where they have all rights and freedoms, and immediately start crying โIslamophobia.โ
โ๐ฃ๐ ๐๐ฆ๐๐๐ฃ๐๐๐ ๐ฌ๐ง retweeted
My God, what is happening to my country?
Irish man Graham Carey sentenced to 2 years in prison for incitement to hatred against migrants.
Can I remind you -
- Angolan migrant Kasonga Mbuyi received a suspended sentence for stabbing a tourist at Dublin airport.
- Congolese man Bakuani Diasivi received a suspended sentence for punching a child.
- Filipino man Ramon Terrobias received a suspended sentence for possession of CSAM.
- Nigerian man Christopher Oshodin received a suspended sentence for โฌ145,000 welfare fraud.
- Indian man Visek Rajesh Leela attempted to abduct a young boy and received a suspended sentence.
- Indian man Vimalkarthick Balasubramaniam sexually assaulted a 14 year-old-girl, received a suspended sentence.
- Indian man Eldhose Yohannan sexually assaulted two patients while working in a hospital. Suspended sentence.
- Indian man Kartikey Gupta sexually assaulted an Irish woman at a concert. Suspended sentence.
- African man Stephan Obelngoa received a suspended sentence for grabbing a little blind girl from her mother, lifting her in the air and smashing her into the ground.
I could go on....
Do you understand what's happening in Ireland?
An Irish man has been sent to prison for 2 years for "incitement to hatred" against migrants, while migrants walk free from Irish courts for violent crimes.
โ๐ฃ๐ ๐๐ฆ๐๐๐ฃ๐๐๐ ๐ฌ๐ง retweeted
Miatta.
Affordable energy. You stood at that conference and said it.
Here is what you did not say.
44 million pounds missing. Four men in custody. The Serious Fraud Office investigating ECO4, the scheme you oversaw. 30,000 families left with botched insulation while contractors pocketed taxpayer cash. You called it systemic failure. Then you got promoted.
You did not inherit the mess. You owned it. Now you hold the red box.
The pedigree. Daughter of a dictator's minister. Your father served Samuel Doe, the Liberian military dictator who seized power in a coup, executed the sitting president, presided over mass killings. Your brother named after Gamal Abdel Nasser, the revolutionary who overthrew a monarchy. Your grandfather convicted of treason for plotting revolution. The British state saved you in 1986. Now you dismantle Britain's energy security.
The hypocrisy. Private school. Oxford. LSE. The socialist who demands wealth taxes while obscuring her own dissolved company. The MP who voted to strip winter fuel from pensioners in Peckham, one of London's poorest constituencies, while drawing her ministerial salary.
The regicide. You resigned to trigger Starmer's collapse. Demanded his orderly transition. Then Burnham rewarded you. Housing Minister, then Energy Secretary. The woman who destroyed the last leader now controls your heating.
You are not an energy secretary. You are a protection racket in a red box. A heterodox zealot who rejects markets while setting market policy. A constituency ghost who failed upward through institutional decay.
The SFO investigation continues. The 44 million pounds is gone. The pensioners still shiver.
And you talk about affordable energy.
โ๐ฃ๐ ๐๐ฆ๐๐๐ฃ๐๐๐ ๐ฌ๐ง retweeted
IN 1985 BIRMINGHAM CITY COUNCIL'S OWN WORKING PARTY FOUND LITTLE GIRLS IN ITS CARE TO BE INVOLVED IN WHAT IT DESCRIBED AS SEX FOR MONEY.
Six years later the councilโs next researcher found girls in its care reporting rape, beatings and burns. Nothing in the councilโs published record shows it ever went after whoever was paying them, beating them, burning them, and raping them.
In 1985 Birmingham Social Services produced a paper called Girls' Prostitution in Care. It recorded girls in the council's care believed to be involved in what it called sexual activity for financial benefit. Someone was paying these children for sex. The national inquiry must find out whether the working party recorded who.
THE COUNCIL HAD THE WARNING IN WRITING SIX YEARS BEFORE JILL JESSON.
After that warning, the council commissioned Dr Jill Jesson in 1990 to quantify the problem so social services could manage it. Her report in 1991 found twenty girls in the council's care whose files recorded rape allegations, violence and pregnancies. She says she was ordered to strip out the ethnicity of the men and the private-hire trade.
Richard Evans, the Director of Social Services, told councillors in December 1995 that there was no significant quantitative problem. Councillors voted down an inquiry. The council cleared itself in 2015.
What happened to the first warning? Who received Girls' Prostitution in Care? Which senior officers and councillors read it?
Birmingham is Jess Phillips's city. She was elected a Labour councillor for Longbridge in 2012 and made the council's first Victims' Champion that June. She held that role in November 2014, when Jesson went public. The 1985 warning is recorded in Jesson's report.
On 28 April 2026, as Safeguarding Minister, she told the Home Affairs Committee that when something obvious is missing that should be there, it "tells a story". Birmingham has republished the Jesson Report, but the original 1985 investigation cited within it has not been published. What did Birmingham's first Victims' Champion do to find it?
AND BIRMINGHAM TODAY.
In 1985 the council's working party picked out twenty-two girls because of their unexplained absences. On 30 September 2026 councillors were told of 143 children identified as experiencing, or at risk of, sexual exploitation, and that fifty-two per cent of them had repeatedly gone missing.
Police were running 98 live child sexual exploitation investigations and six known grooming gangs. The warning sign the council wrote down in 1985 is in its own figures in 2026. The national inquiry must recover Girls' Prostitution in Care, call its four authors to give evidence and establish who received it.
Read my full article into the Jesson Report here:
redwallandtherabble.co.uk/foโฆ
On my next live transmission I will go through what the Jesson Report reveals about the 1985 warning, and why the national inquiry must recover the original.
Raja Miah MBE
Until we came along, Birmingham Council had buried the Jesson Report. We helped force them to republish it. We did the same to get Birmingham named by the national inquiry.
More than 1,000 of you have joined since June. I need another 1,000 to hold the National Inquiry to account. By now you know no one else will do what I do..
I share all my content for free. There are no paywalls to access any of my work. All I ask, for those that can afford to do so, is support me ยฃ3 a month or ยฃ30 a year so that I can continue the work.
๐ด Sign Up Here
๐ redwallandtherabble.co.uk
Raja Miah MBE
โ๐ฃ๐ ๐๐ฆ๐๐๐ฃ๐๐๐ ๐ฌ๐ง retweeted
Vasily Prozorov was one of two former Ukrainian secret service agents who passed the information to me evidencing the child trafficking from Ukraine to the UK.
The UK Government were not interested in the file when I have it them in 2022. It all made sense when the Epstein files were released 2024.
Prozorov said
Zelensky could easily manufacture a 75% approval rating for himself in an election, according to Vasily Prozorov.
"The polling agencies under his control could easily paint a picture of 75% public support. For instance, a recent poll conducted by the KIIS (Kiev International Institute of Sociology) in September supposedly showed 75% support for him, with nearly 70% in favor of continuing the war.
These figures can be conveniently presented to his Western handlers as proof: 'Look, the people support me.' By citing such numbers, one could easily convince anyone that the public is against Zelenskyโs departure," the former SBU officer explained.
video by t.me/radio_sputnik/96292
Source: UKR Leaks
โ๐ฃ๐ ๐๐ฆ๐๐๐ฃ๐๐๐ ๐ฌ๐ง retweeted
The plant-based plate looks clean because nobody stands in the field when the harvest comes.
Grow wheat and the combine goes through in July at seven miles an hour. Field mice, voles, leverets and skylark chicks go in at the front and come out the back.
Grow rice and the paddy is flooded, drained and sprayed. The frogs, fish and snakes that moved in with the water are left on the mud when it goes.
Grow oilseed rape and the field turns yellow in May. The bees that come for it take away the neonicotinoids the seed was dressed in.
Grow almonds and two million hives are trucked into one Californian valley every February. A third of the bees that go in do not come out.
Grow sugar cane and the field is set alight before the cutters go in. Everything living in it burns, or runs for the road and is hit there.
Grow soy and the savannah is bulldozed first. The anteaters, the maned wolves and the armadillos lose the ground they lived on, and the beans go into a drink with a leaf on the carton.
Grow palm oil and the forest is cleared for it. Borneo lost 100,000 orangutans in sixteen years so a biscuit could last longer on the shelf.
Grow potatoes and the crop is sprayed a dozen times a season. The soil underneath stops being a living thing full of worms and becomes a material the plant stands in.
Now the cow.
She stands in a field that has not seen a plough in living memory. Skylarks nest in the grass under her. Dung beetles work the pats. Hares sit in the tussocks. Nothing is sprayed, because nothing needs to be.
When her time comes, one animal dies, quickly, with a man standing beside her.
Pasture is the only crop in Britain that gets to keep its wildlife, and it is the one you were told to feel guilty about.
โ๐ฃ๐ ๐๐ฆ๐๐๐ฃ๐๐๐ ๐ฌ๐ง retweeted
I first shared this on Sunday morning. At the time, I did not know what I know now. What you need to know is that the legacy media silence will not stop the truth from being shared.
What I have to share next is not for words on a page. Look out for a video and decide for yourself who was
sacrificed and for what.
Raja Miah MBE
ONE GIRL WAS THROWN FROM A MOVING CAR. ANOTHER WAS BURNED. SIX RETURNED WITH SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES. FOUR BECAME PREGNANT.
Some were just 13 years old. These were children in the care of Birmingham City Council. Girls who should have been protected by the very authorities responsible for their safety.
In 1991, Dr Jill Jesson exposed what was happening to them. She identified links to Asian private-hire drivers and subsequently revealed that she had been ordered to remove the ethnicity of the men from her findings.
Copies of her report were ordered destroyed. Birmingham councillors later voted against an inquiry. Years later, the council investigated itself and declared there had been no cover-up.
NOW LOOK AT THE POLITICIANS REPRESENTING BIRMINGHAM.
Jess Phillips, MP for Birmingham Yardley, became the Minister for Safeguarding and Violence Against Women and Girls. When demands for a government-led grooming gangs inquiry were made, she rejected Oldham's request and supported powerless locally led investigations instead. Are we to believe she did not know what was happening in her own backyard?
And then there is Shabana Mahmood.
Mahmood has represented Birmingham Ladywood since 2010. Her own website proudly documents years of campaigning for Palestine. But where is the equivalent record of her campaigning for the girls sexually exploited in her own city? Where was her campaign to uncover what happened to the Jill Jesson Report?
Mahmood is now the Home Secretary, responsible for the national statutory grooming gangs inquiry.
A FOR BIRMINGHAM TODAY
98 live child sexual exploitation investigations. Six suspected grooming gangs roaming the streets. Two private-hire drivers stripped of their licences following police intelligence about potential sexual offences against children.
And the ethnicity of the men involved is still hidden.
My latest article follows the evidence through successive Birmingham administrations. I identify the politicians, chief executives and senior officials who held power when the decisions were made, and set out who Baroness Longfield must now call to account.
Read it here and get ready for my live transmission where I line by line analyse the Jesson Report.
Raja Miah MBE
redwallandtherabble.co.uk/foโฆ
_________
Unfortunately, we are reaching the end of the road where I can continue working this way.
The paid subscriptions have stalled. Worse, tens of thousands of people are now reading these articles without even joining the free mailing list. The audience is growing, but the number of people actually standing behind the work is not growing with it.
This is becoming impossible to sustain.
You know what we are up against. The mainstream media will not touch my work. Institutions I investigate do not volunteer their records. Politicians do not suddenly decide to hold themselves to account.
And yet, despite all of that, we forced the national inquiry. We did that because enough ordinary people refused to go away.
But getting the inquiry was never the end of this campaign. In many ways it was only the beginning. Now we have to watch where it goes, what it investigates, which places it avoids, which witnesses it calls, which records it obtains and whether the same institutions that failed these children are allowed to control the story again.
Nobody else is going to do that work for us. And I cannot do it indefinitely working on my own. That is why I keep talking about 50,000 committed subscribers.
It is not a vanity number. I did not pluck it out of the air. With fifty thousand people with me means when we uncover something important, it does not depend on a newspaper editor, a television producer or an algorithm deciding whether you are allowed to see it.
It gives us reach they cannot easily shut down.
But there is another reason. I need to build a proper backroom operation around this work. At the moment I am investigating, researching, writing, publishing, producing the videos, running the newsletter, dealing with the technology and then starting again. It is unsustainable.
I need people behind me who can take care of the technical and production work so that I can spend my time doing the thing I do best. That is why we have been pushing so hard for new paid subscribers.
๐ด SIGN UP HERE
๐ redwallandtherabble.co.uk
If you read my work and want it to continue, I need your help. Sign up for free. There are no paywalls to access any of my work. If you can afford the ยฃ3 a month or ยฃ30 for the year, please become a paid subscriber.
We forced the inquiry. Now we need the numbers to make sure they cannot control what happens next.
Raja Miah MBE
โ ๏ธ In any other job a positive work output of just 36% would get you fired ๐ฅ.
There is no way this is negligence or incompetence.
The @ukhomeoffice is clearly losing asylum appeals by design in order to continue filling up the UK with rapey, stabby, criminals intent on destroying our civilised home.
โ๏ธ Eject the illegals.
โ๏ธ Eject Labour.
๐ Save Britain.
๐จ THE TAXPAYER FUNDED SCAM WHERE THE HOME OFFICE INTENTIONALLY LOSES ASYLUM APPEALS!
I want you to look at the absolute racket taking place inside British immigration tribunals today.
Shabana Mahmood is actively hiring civil servants with zero legal qualifications and zero courtroom experience to represent Britain in deportation battles.
Meanwhile, the state dishes out 59 million pounds in taxpayer funded legal aid so illegal migrants and foreign criminals can hire high powered immigration barristers!
You have elite human rights lawyers on one side, completely unqualified novices on the other, and the British public forced to pay the invoice for both.
Look at the inevitable, catastrophic outcome.
Nearly two thirds of all rejected asylum seekers who challenge their deportation successfully overturn the decision, with the Home Office losing an unbelievable 64 percent of appeals.
Over 156,000 appeals are currently clogging the courts, and ministers are deliberately sending people with no legal background to get torn to pieces by activist solicitors.
The entire deportation tribunal system is a theatre designed for failure so politicians can pretend they are enforcing laws while ensuring foreign arrivals never leave.
Andy Burnham and Shabana Mahmood have turned border enforcement into a multi million pound circus where the taxpayer always loses.
Retweet this immediately to expose the rigged legal racket keeping foreign offenders on British streets. ๐ฌ๐ง
An long yet excellent and valuable article, shining a light on why and how democracy can be subverted and by whom.
"I SWEAR BY ALMIGHTY GOD..."
Those are the first words Lindsay Hoyle spoke when he took the Speaker's chair in November 2019. An oath of allegiance. A promise of impartiality. A vow to protect parliamentary democracy on behalf of every person in this country.
He lied.
Not through incompetence. Not through misjudgement. Through deliberate, sustained, documented betrayal of every constitutional duty his office demands. And he has done it while charging you ยฃ370,000 for the flights.
This is not a political opinion. This is a public record. Read every word.
THE MOST POWERFUL MAN YOU HAVE NEVER SCRUTINISED
Everyone watches the Prime Minister. Nobody watches Lindsay Hoyle.
That is the trick.
The Prime Minister makes policy. Lindsay Hoyle decides whether that policy ever faces a single serious question. He controls who speaks. He controls what gets asked. He controls what gets buried. He decides whether the Prime Minister answers or evades. He runs the kill switch on British democracy and for seven years nobody has pointed a camera at the man holding it.
Understand what that power actually means in practice.
Since the 2024 general election, Reform UK has been the fastest growing political force in this country. At its peak, polling at 36 percent. The party that millions of British people turned to when they had nowhere else to go. Their leader, Nigel Farage, sits in the House of Commons with a mandate from those millions.
Lindsay Hoyle has called him to speak at Prime Minister's Questions six times. Six occasions in over two years. A party representing more than a third of the country. A party whose voters want answers on rape gangs, open borders and the eight billion pound annual migration bill that every working person in this country pays for whether they voted for it or not.
Six questions. Then silence. Then next week. Then silence again.
That is not procedure. That is a decision. His decision. Nobody else's.
THE LABOUR SLEEPER CELL
Before you ask why, understand who Lindsay Hoyle is.
He was elected as the Labour MP for Chorley in 1997. Labour Chairman. Deputy Speaker under a Labour government from 2010 to 2019. His father, Doug Hoyle, Labour MP, Labour peer, co-founder of the Labour Friends of Israel network in 1957. Lindsay Hoyle was born into Labour. Raised in Labour. Paid by Labour. Promoted by Labour.
In November 2019 he took the Speaker's chair and relinquished his party affiliation. That is the convention. The costume change. The new robe over the same body.
He never stopped being Labour. The evidence is in every decision he has made since the day he sat down.
When Tories needed protecting, he looked away. When Reform needed a voice, he found reasons not to call them. When Labour needed saving, he broke 400 years of parliamentary law to deliver it. The proof is not an accusation. It is a pattern. And patterns do not lie.
Why do the Tories allow it? Ask the 50 MPs who signed no confidence motions after the Gaza vote. They had the numbers. They had the cause. The response from Tory leadership was to bury the motion. Penny Mordaunt, the Conservative Commons Leader, stood up and called him a decent man. Government sources briefed the press they were not pushing for removal.
They had the votes. They chose protection over principle. Because when Tories win, they want a Hoyle too. The Speaker's chair is not an office. It is a mutual protection racket for the two-party cartel. They protect him now. He protects them later. You get left outside.
THE CONSTITUTIONAL COUP
February 21st, 2024. The SNP tabled a motion for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza. Parliament was ready to vote. The Clerk of the House, the most senior constitutional expert in the building, advised Hoyle to follow 400 years of parliamentary precedent.
He ignored her.
Instead, Hoyle broke convention to allow a Labour amendment that killed the SNP motion outright. Not adjusted it. Killed it. The government walked out. The SNP walked out. Over 50 MPs signed formal motions of no confidence in the Speaker of the House of Commons.
He cried at the despatch box. He apologised. He kept his job.
Because this is the critical thing to understand. He did not make a mistake. He made a delivery. Keir Starmer was facing the most dangerous rebellion of his leadership. Hoyle ended it. The tears were theatre. The result was a Labour leader protected from his own party by the man who is constitutionally required to be neutral.
That was not a one-off. That was a demonstration of function.
THE HIDDEN HAND
August 2025. Journalists filed a Freedom of Information request. Simple enough. Show us the Speaker's emails with the Israeli Embassy, with members of the Knesset, and with Labour Friends of Israel.
Hoyle blocked them personally. Claimed the disclosure would prejudice the effective conduct of public affairs.
His father founded Labour Friends of Israel. Hoyle visited Israel in November 2023 as a guest of the Netanyahu government while the bodies were still being counted. He came home. He manipulated the Gaza vote. He blocked the emails.
You do not hide correspondence you are proud of. You hide the hand that feeds.
THE QUESTIONS HE BURIES
While Reform sits in near silence, while the party of millions is called six times in two years, ask yourself what questions are not being asked.
The rape gang inquiry. Decades of industrialised child sexual abuse in Rotherham, Telford, Rochdale, Oldham and 149 other districts across England. Thousands of victims. Years of institutional cover up. A national statutory inquiry that only began work in April 2026 after years of political obstruction. The survivors are still waiting. The chamber stays quiet.
The eight billion pound migration bill. Asylum support costs the British taxpayer between four and eight billion pounds every single year. Every year. While NHS waiting lists grow. While pensioners freeze. While working families choose between heating and eating. 627,000 non-EU migrants entered the UK between December 2024 and December 2025 alone. The questions that would demand answers for this do not get called.
The police. Hoyle presides over a parliament that has not had a single meaningful PMQs exchange on two-tier policing. On the documented reality that protesters on one side of an argument are arrested within hours while those on the other face nothing. That ordinary British people have been prosecuted for social media posts while violence on the streets goes unpunished. The police are never held to account in that chamber. The Home Secretary is never pressed. The question never gets called.
London. The capital city of the United Kingdom has become a place where the murder rate makes international headlines, where businesses close, where families leave, where violence is the background noise of daily life for millions of people. At Prime Minister's Questions, London's destruction is not spoken of. It is managed away. Swallowed by procedure and the Speaker's choice of who stands up next.
Two-tier justice. The most corrosive accusation in British public life. That the law is applied differently depending on who you are, where you come from and what you believe. That one group protests and goes home, another is kettled, arrested and charged. This demands the floor of the House of Commons more than almost anything else alive in British politics today.
It does not get the floor. Because Lindsay Hoyle controls the floor. And the floor stays clean.
THE MAN WHO SHOULD BE HOUNDED
Here is what common sense tells you.
The Prime Minister answers to Parliament. Parliament answers to the public. But Lindsay Hoyle controls what Parliament is allowed to ask. Which means Lindsay Hoyle, in practical terms, controls what the Prime Minister ever has to answer for. He sits one step above the entire chain of accountability and nobody is pointing at him.
He is not the Speaker of the House. That title flatters him with neutrality he abandoned years ago. He is the man who decides which questions about the running of the United Kingdom are permitted inside the only building in this country with the constitutional power to demand answers.
That man should face more scrutiny than the Prime Minister. More pressure. More public attention. After every single PMQs, every person in this country who watched a question go unasked, who saw Reform sit silent, who watched the Prime Minister dodge something that was never even put, should be on his account on X demanding to know why. Which questions he buried that day. Which MP he did not call. Which scandal he let pass without a single moment of sunlight.
He has hidden behind the procedural robes of his office for seven years. He has relied on the public not knowing what he controls. On the assumption that scrutiny stops at the despatch box and never reaches the chair above it.
That assumption ends here.
Lindsay Hoyle is accountable to every person in this country for every question that died in that chamber unasked. For every rape gang victim whose story never forced a minister to their feet. For every Londoner whose city rotted while the chamber debated safer ground. For every person watching two-tier justice play out on their phone who looked at Parliament and saw silence.
He chose that silence. Week after week. Session after session. He should be treated accordingly.
THE THEFT
While he runs the kill switch on your democracy, he extracts the maximum personal benefit available.
Three hundred and seventy thousand pounds in taxpayer-funded foreign travel. First-class flights. Five-star hotels. Eight hundred pounds a night in Qatar. Five hundred pounds to ship an extra suitcase to South Africa. Errors in the official expense logs he was forced to correct after journalists filed Freedom of Information requests.
When the Daily Mail exposed the scale of it, he did not apologise. He changed the rules. Reduced expense publication from monthly to quarterly. Less transparency. Less scrutiny. More darkness.
His wife, Catherine Swindley, employed on the public payroll as his part-time constituency secretary. The same wife who succeeded him as Labour councillor for Adlington when he became an MP. The same public money. The same family. Different job title.
He earns one hundred and sixty thousand pounds a year. He lives in a grace-and-favour apartment inside the Palace of Westminster. He keeps nearly three hundred gifts accumulated over four years. And in February 2026, while on yet another taxpayer-funded trip abroad, he telephoned the Metropolitan Police and tipped them off that Peter Mandelson was a flight risk, triggering the former Labour peer's arrest. The Met apologised for revealing he was the source. He volunteered nothing. He was caught.
THE SHAPE OF IT
Look at what is documented here. Not rumour. Not inference. Documented, Hansard-confirmed, FOI-verified, Register of Members Interests-recorded fact.
A Speaker born into Labour, promoted by Labour, who spent 22 years as a Labour MP before taking a chair that demands absolute neutrality. Who broke 400 years of parliamentary convention to save a Labour leader from his own party. Who blocked Freedom of Information requests about his private correspondence with foreign officials. Who called the leader of the fastest-growing political party in Britain six times in two years. Who shortened Prime Minister's Questions from 71 minutes to 33. Who refuses to judge whether the Prime Minister answers truthfully. Who changed his own expense rules when the public found out what he was spending. Who employed his wife on public money. Who tipped off police from a foreign hotel room and hoped nobody would find out. Who has accumulated three hundred and seventy thousand pounds in travel expenses and counting. Who buried questions on rape gangs, two-tier policing, London's collapse and open borders week after week while calling it procedure.
The question is not whether Lindsay Hoyle is compromised. His own record answers that beyond any serious argument.
The question is why this is the first time you are reading it.
The Speaker can be removed by a motion of the House. The Standards Committee has authority to investigate. The Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards can receive complaints today. The 50 MPs who signed no confidence motions in 2024 had the numbers and the cause.
They chose to protect him. Because he protects them. Because the system protects itself. Because the questions that would destroy them on rape gangs, on open borders, on the eight billion pound annual bill you never voted for, those questions die in Lindsay Hoyle's inbox every single week.
He is not a failed Speaker. He is a successful one. The measure of his success is what survives. He survives. The corruption survives. The unanswered questions survive. The buried inquiries survive. The silenced opposition survives.
And you pay for the flights.
The evidence is in the public record. It has always been there. The question is whether enough people in this country still have the courage to read it, say it out loud, and refuse to look away.
All facts are drawn from Hansard parliamentary records, the Register of Members Financial Interests, Freedom of Information responses, GB News, BBC News, The Guardian, The Telegraph, The Daily Mail, Declassified UK, Politico and contemporaneous reporting between November 2019 and October 2026.
Brussels Boy Burnham seems unable to even breathe without lying. When the hell did the quality and calibre of our MP's descend to such depthsโ๏ธ
Apparently the mass majority of Britain want to have closer ties with the EU?!
That's news to me!
Where does Burnham get this info from?
And saying it will help our growth?!
How when the Eu is imploding?!!!! And its debt to reach 1 TRILLION next year!
And how will Farners be helped? When Farmers are protesting all over the EU for their damaging policies?!!!
Liar liar liar โผ๏ธโผ๏ธโผ๏ธโผ๏ธ



























