From Survival to Stadiums: What the Rise of Sports Reveals About AI and Work Imagine trying to explain the Super Bowl to a farmer in 1800. Tens of thousands of people gathering in a stadium, millions more watching remotely, billions of dollars changing hands—all centered around a game. It wouldn’t just seem unlikely; it would seem irrational. And yet, this is exactly what happens when an economy moves beyond survival. As productivity rises, time and income are freed, and entirely new industries emerge—industries that depend not on necessity, but on human desire. This dynamic is at the heart of a recurring mistake in how we think about technology and work. Throughout history, every major wave of technological disruption has triggered the same fear: that machines would permanently eliminate human jobs. The Luddites smashed looms in the 1810s. Economists in the 1930s warned of “technological unemployment.” In the 1980s, experts predicted robots would hollow out factory work. Each time, the fear wasn’t entirely irrational—jobs were destroyed—but the conclusion was wrong. What those predictions missed is what economists call the Lump of Labor Fallacy: the assumption that there is a fixed amount of work to be done, so if a machine takes a job, a human loses one permanently. In reality, productivity doesn’t just redistribute work—it expands the set of things humans are able to want, afford, and spend time on. The Industrial Revolution is the clearest example. Before it, roughly 80–90% of the population was engaged in subsistence agriculture. Most people worked long hours just to meet basic needs. Under those conditions, industries built around leisure, entertainment, or personal fulfillment simply couldn’t exist at scale. But as productivity increased, the cost of survival fell. People began to have more discretionary income and, just as importantly, more discretionary time. And with that came entirely new categories of economic activity—many of which would have seemed absurd just a generation earlier. Professional sports is one of the most visible examples. When people no longer needed to spend nearly all of their time working, the idea of watching others compete became viable. What was once a pastime became a global industry worth hundreds of billions of dollars, employing not just athletes, but coaches, broadcasters, agents, stadium engineers, marketers, and sports psychologists. The same pattern repeated across other domains. Cinema and recorded music didn’t just create entertainers; they created entire ecosystems of new work—cinematographers, sound engineers, set designers, producers, talent agents, publicists, and now streaming platform architects. Pharmaceuticals and modern medicine expanded as rising wealth created both the demand and the funding for longer, healthier lives, supporting vast networks of researchers, clinicians, manufacturers, and regulators. Aviation and automobiles didn’t just produce vehicles; they gave rise to entire supporting infrastructures—highways, insurance, motels, drive-through restaurants, airport retail, air traffic control, and mass tourism. Even video games—an industry now larger than film and music combined—employ game designers, narrative writers, esports athletes, streamers, and modders, roles that would have been inconceivable just a few decades ago. In each case, the mechanism is the same: productivity gains compress the cost of necessities, which frees up both money and time, which in turn creates demand for new goods, services, and experiences. Human wants are not fixed. Once one layer of needs is satisfied, new desires emerge—often in forms that would have previously seemed trivial, indulgent, or even irrational. What begins as luxury becomes normal, and what seems unnecessary becomes an entire industry.

I started wearing hearing aids👂last week and it has profoundly changed my life… I believe everyone will be augmenting their hearing in the future - but I just got an early look because I damaged my ears at one too many rock concerts. A 🧵1/10