GlobalCitizen|Thinker|Lecturer|Researcher|Management Consultant| Entrepreneur|Investor|Motivational speaker|Mentor|Author|Redeemed.

East Midlands, England
Joined December 2010
WMurithi, PhD. retweeted
Google just automated the PhD. They built an AI that reads a problem, forms hypotheses, runs experiments, writes the paper, AND simulates its own peer review. no human touches it. It’s called “ScientistTwo” It is a fully autonomous multi-agent framework that executes end-to-end machine learning research. Without a single human in the loop. You give it a fundamental challenge. That’s it. The AI independently navigates the literature. It establishes the baselines. It formulates novel hypotheses. Then it writes the code. It runs the experiments. It conducts its own ablation studies. It even argues with a simulated peer-review engine to refine its work before submitting. The results are staggering. Researchers tested ScientistTwo against the highest standards of human scientific achievement—papers accepted at top-tier conferences like NeurIPS and ICML. The AI improved human state-of-the-art results on 86 different tasks. It generated an average performance gain of 25.2% over the absolute best human models. It didn't hallucinate a single citation. It wrote fully executable, verified codebases. And it autonomously generated expert-level, publication-ready papers. We’ve spent the last two years using AI as a highly advanced intern to help us write code and summarize data. That era is over. ScientistTwo isn't an assistant. It is an autonomous scientific pioneer. It doesn't just summarize the frontier of human knowledge. It expands it. If an AI can autonomously hypothesize, test, and publish breakthroughs in machine learning... How long until it discovers something we don't even have the math to understand?
92
558
97
2,035
180,347
WMurithi, PhD. retweeted
BREAKING NEWS! The engineer who built Claude Code from scratch just released a 28-minute video that's pure gold: how to write prompts that deliver ridiculously good results. I've seen $300 courses that don't even come close to what he explains in the first 10 minutes. CLAUDE.md files, memory shortcuts, parallel sessions, and prompting patterns that almost no one uses... All in one single video. Completely free. No fluff. Whether you're a developer, just starting, or have already been using Claude for months, this changes the game for you starting today. Save. Watch. Share.
56
659
11
3,579
860,397
WMurithi, PhD. retweeted
I came here and told you that cancer is a parasite I came here and told you a combination of ivermectin and fenbendenzole cures cancers in different doses mkaniita conspiracy... There you go
14
404
1
896
25,752
WMurithi, PhD. retweeted
10
623
19
2,213
385,207
This SOP won me a funded internship at the Max Planck Institute in Germany. You can use this as a template for your next fully funded PhD, scholarship, or research application. If you're applying for funded opportunities (PhD/Masters/ Internships) in 2026 and want mentorship writing an SOP that makes your profile stand out, DM me "SOP." I'll tell you how I work with students.
67
82
4
624
79,456
WMurithi, PhD. retweeted
𝗧𝗵𝗲𝘀𝗶𝘀 𝗪𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗠𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿'𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗣𝗵.𝗗. 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗴𝗿𝗮𝗺 docdroid.net/Yprt7H7/thesis-…
5
133
2
560
21,816
WMurithi, PhD. retweeted
10
550
12
3,060
137,124
WMurithi, PhD. retweeted
These 9 lectures from Stanford University are the BEST for anyone wanting to learn and understand LLMs in depth Lecture 1 - Transformer: lnkd.in/dGnQW39t Lecture 2 - Transformer-Based Models & Tricks: lnkd.in/dT_VEpVH Lecture 3 - Tranformers & Large Language Models: lnkd.in/dwjjpjaP Lecture 4 - LLM Training: lnkd.in/dSi_xCEN Lecture 5 - LLM tuning: lnkd.in/dUK5djpB Lecture 6 - LLM Reasoning: lnkd.in/dAGQTNAM Lecture 7 - Agentic LLMs: lnkd.in/dWD4j7vm Lecture 8 - LLM Evaluation: lnkd.in/ddxE5zvb Lecture 9 - Recap & Current Trends: lnkd.in/dGsTd8jN Start understanding LLMs in depth from the experts. Go through each step-by-step video Start understanding LLMs in depth from the experts. Go through each step-by-step video
15
50
148
6,930
WMurithi, PhD. retweeted
What a strong research introduction should look like… #phd
114
576
21,026
WMurithi, PhD. retweeted
MIT just quietly dropped a free AI curriculum that puts $50,000 university courses to shame. 12 books. Zero tuition. From the same institution that produced the people building the models everyone is talking about. FOUNDATIONS 1. Foundations of Machine Learning — lnkd.in/gytjT5HC 2. Understanding Deep Learning — lnkd.in/dgcB68Qt 3. Machine Learning Systems — lnkd.in/dkiGZisg ADVANCED TECHNIQUES 4. Algorithms for ML — algorithmsbook.com 5. Deep Learning — lnkd.in/g2efT6DK REINFORCEMENT LEARNING 6. RL Basics (Sutton & Barto) — lnkd.in/guxqxcZZ 7. Distributional RL — lnkd.in/d4eNP-pe 8. Multi-Agent Systems — marl-book.com 9. Long Game AI — lnkd.in/g-WtzvwX ETHICS & PROBABILITY 10. Fairness in ML — fairmlbook.org 11. Probabilistic ML Part 1 — lnkd.in/g-isbdjj 12. Probabilistic ML Part 2 — lnkd.in/gJE9fy4w This is a complete MIT-level AI education. Not a YouTube playlist. Not a Twitter thread full of fluff. Textbooks written by the researchers who built the field. The people who actually study this will not just understand AI better than their peers. They will understand it better than most people currently getting paid to work in it. Most people will bookmark this and never open it. The ones who open it tonight are the ones who show up in 12 months having built something nobody around them understands yet. Bookmark this. Open the first one tonight. Follow @cyrilXBT for more resources that actually compound.
99
1,135
46
4,136
430,759
WMurithi, PhD. retweeted
Learn AI for free directly from top companies. 1 - Anthropic: anthropic.skilljar.com 2 - Google: grow.google/ai 3 - Meta: ai.meta.com/resources/ 4 - NVIDIA: developer.nvidia.com/cuda 5 - Microsoft: learn.microsoft.com/en-us/tr… 6 - OpenAI: academy.openai.com 7 - IBM: skillsbuild.org 8 - AWS: skillbuilder.aws 9 - DeepLearning.AI: deeplearning.ai 10 - Hugging Face: huggingface.co/learn 👇Comment "Learning" if you find this helpful. Repost so others can take help. Must bookmark for future reference.
10
104
1
379
60,803
The importance of stupidity in scientific research:
1
33
206
10,640
WMurithi, PhD. retweeted
An MIT professor taught the same math course for 62 years, and the day he retired, students from every country on earth showed up online to watch him give his final lecture. I opened the playlist at 2am and ended up watching three of them back to back. His name is Gilbert Strang. The course is MIT 18.06 Linear Algebra. Every machine learning engineer, every data scientist, every quant, every self-taught programmer who actually understands how AI works learned the math from this one man. Most of them never set foot on MIT's campus. They just opened a free playlist on YouTube and let him teach. Here's the story almost nobody tells you. Strang joined the MIT math faculty in 1962. He retired in 2023. That is 61 years of standing at the same chalkboard teaching the same subject to 18-year-olds. The interesting part is what he did when MIT launched OpenCourseWare in 2002. Most professors were skeptical. They worried that putting their lectures online would make their classrooms irrelevant. Strang did not hesitate. He said his life's mission was to open mathematics to students everywhere. He filmed every lecture and gave it away. The decision quietly changed how the world learns math. For decades linear algebra was taught the wrong way. Professors started with abstract vector spaces and proofs about field axioms. Students drowned in the abstraction. Most never recovered. They walked out believing they were bad at math when they had simply been taught in an order that nobody's brain is built to absorb. Strang inverted the entire curriculum. He started with matrix multiplication. Something you can write down on paper. Something you can compute by hand. Something you can see. Then he showed his students that everything else in linear algebra eigenvectors, singular value decomposition, orthogonality, the four fundamental subspaces was just a different lens for understanding what the matrix was actually doing under the hood. His rule was strict. If a student could not explain a concept using a concrete 3 by 3 example, that student did not actually understand the concept yet. The abstraction was supposed to come last, not first. The intuition was the foundation. The proofs were just confirmation that the intuition was correct. The second thing Strang changed was the classroom itself. He said please and thank you to his students. Every single lecture. He paused mid-derivation to ask "am I OK?" to check if anyone was lost. He never used the word "obviously" or "trivially" because he knew exactly what those words do to a student who is one step behind. He treated 19-year-olds learning math for the first time the way he treated his own colleagues. With patience. With respect. With the assumption that they belonged in the room. For 62 years. The result is something that has never happened in the history of education. A single math professor became the default teacher of his subject for the entire planet. Universities in India, China, Brazil, Nigeria, every country with a computer science department, started telling their own students to just watch Strang's lectures. The University of Illinois revised its linear algebra course to do almost no in-person lecturing. The reason was honest. The professor said they could not compete with the videos. His final lecture was in May 2023. The auditorium was packed with students who had never met him before. He walked to the chalkboard, taught for an hour, and at the end the entire room stood and applauded. He looked confused for a moment, like he genuinely did not understand why they were cheering. Then he smiled and waved them off and walked out. His written comment under the YouTube video of that final lecture was four sentences long. He said teaching had been a wonderful life. He said he was grateful to everyone who saw the importance of linear algebra. He said the movement of teaching it well would continue because it was right. That was it. No book promotion. No farewell speech. No legacy management. The man whose teaching is the foundation of modern AI just thanked the audience and went home. 20 million views. Zero ego. The entire engine of the AI revolution sits on top of math that millions of people learned for free from one quiet professor in Cambridge. The course is still on MIT OpenCourseWare. Every lecture, every problem set, every exam, every solution. Free. The most important math course of the 21st century is sitting one click away from you. Most people will never open it.
535
8,111
592
31,679
2,421,856
WMurithi, PhD. retweeted
PhD Students - Here is an example of a good introduction A good introduction should have the following 6 parts. 1. Topic introduction 2. Topic background 3. Research problem 4. Research objective 5. Research methodology 6. Paper outline
3
198
4
976
39,791
WMurithi, PhD. retweeted
Golden rules for writing research that gets published Save it for your next manuscript & Retweet to help your network! — Pick concrete words over abstract ones — Write for your readers, not yourself — Use your natural voice, then polish — Tell a focused story - stay on track — Own your work and decisions — Make confident statements — Cut unnecessary words — Keep examples simple — Stay self-aware 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁'𝘀 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝘁𝗼𝗽 𝘁𝗶𝗽 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗰𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗿 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵 𝘄𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴? ---------------- 𝗙𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱 𝗶𝘁 𝘂𝘀𝗲𝗳𝘂𝗹? 🔄 Retweet (& like) + follow + 🔔 I test AI tools to simplify your #research & #analysis (& 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘥𝘶𝘤𝘵 𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘴 𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘮)
2
62
183
6,669
WMurithi, PhD. retweeted
The effects of smartphone addiction on learning: A meta-analysis rex.libraries.wsu.edu/esplor…
6
278
5
961
37,093
WMurithi, PhD. retweeted
6
114
1
515
23,965
WMurithi, PhD. retweeted
The 10 best color combinations for men 1.
197
2,199
68
22,289
3,376,419
WMurithi, PhD. retweeted
Your literature review does not need 200 papers. It needs 30. The right 30. In the right order. Most PhD students spend a year learning this the hard way.
10
199
2
892
38,815
How to write your Methods Struggling with your paper's method section? They said it's easy. But you're just stuck. Here's the secret step-by-step guide to help you ace it:
2
31
116
9,067