Founded in 1957, the William & Mary Law Review is a general interest legal publication managed by the students of William & Mary Law School.

Williamsburg, Virginia
Joined November 2014
Volume 66, Issue 2 is now live! Take a break from law school exams, and read it here: wmlawreview.org This issue features an amazing lineup. For more information, see below!
1
2
2
380
Congratulations to Issue 2 Note author Natalie Hatton! Her Note—“Rights and Redress for Transgender Survivors of Prison Rape: The Failures of the Prison Rape Elimination Act”—can be read here: wmlawreview.org/sites/defaul…
1
2
100
Congratulations to Issue 2 Note author Kyle Saxon! His Note—“A Transformative Standard for Transformative Times: Protecting Student-Athlete Speech in the Era of Name, Image, and Likeness”—can be found here: wmlawreview.org/sites/defaul…
2
77
Check out this interesting @NewYorker piece featuring Prof. Annette Gordon-Reed (@agordonreed)! The Law Review will publish Prof. Gordon-Reed’s recent lecture on the Enlightenment and American history in Volume 66, Issue 3. newyorker.com/books/book-cur…
3
111
Please join us in welcoming our Volume 66 Editorial Board and Staff! We are excited to continue the tradition of excellent legal scholarship at @WMLawSchool!
1
3
5
392
Wᴍ. & Mᴀʀʏ L. Rᴇᴠ. retweeted
What are the implications of #Section230 for Black communities? Learn more in a law review written by @SpencerOverton and Catherine Powell that was published in @WMLawReview today: wmlawreview.org/implications…
1
1
223
Check out this @lawfare piece in which @ElenaChachko and @katerinalinos discuss their new Article in the William & Mary Law Review!
.@ElenaChachko and @katerinalinos argue that "emergency powers can, under limited conditions, be appropriately used not only to return a society to the status quo before the emergency but also to bring about societal transformations." lawfaremedia.org/article/eme…
1
2
440
Volume 66, Issue 1 is out! Read it here: wmlawreview.org/issues/66 This Issue features a wonderful lineup! For more information, see the 🧵below:
1
2
5
492
Our student notes include: Dulaney Marsh’s “Sackett v. EPA and the Future of Wetland protections” (wmlawreview.org/sackett-v-ep…) and John Thayer’s “Defamation or Impersonation? Working Towards a Legislative Remedy for Deepfake Election Misinformation” (wmlawreview.org/defamation-o…)
1
1
3
153
Thank you to all the authors and editors who made this incredible Issue!
2
113
Wᴍ. & Mᴀʀʏ L. Rᴇᴠ. retweeted
Prof. @cjbuccafusco builds his case for why copyright law does not need the independent creation doctrine, and would actually be better off without it in “There’s No Such Thing as Independent Creation, and It’s a Good Thing, Too.” (pub @WMLawReview) 🔗bit.ly/43E3NqU
5
16
1,867
Wᴍ. & Mᴀʀʏ L. Rᴇᴠ. retweeted
The second, Issues, is forthcoming @WMLawReview. I argue that the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure use the term “issue” in a variety of ways, some of which are ambiguous, creating interpretive challenges in the lower courts. /
Now up on SSRN are two draft Articles (comments welcome)! The Major Questions Doctrine in the States (forthcoming at @washulaw Review: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.… Issues (forthcoming at @WMLawReview): papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.… I’ll do a short thread about each. //
1
1
11
1,234
Thank you, @profjuliet! It was a pleasure!
In print! Always a pleasure to work through these issues with ⁦@ChrisOdinet⁩. Thanks to ⁦@WMLawReview⁩ for a terrific editing experience. As for the article, here’s a spoiler: it is NOT a how-to manual😀
1
288