You lie badly. Answer these questions your procurement officer 👮 won’t. 1. Please identify the complete sequence of Runbeck contracts and amendments governing the November 3, 2020 General Election, including the effective dates of each contract and amendment. 2. Which Disaster Recovery Plan was contractually in effect for the November 3, 2020 General Election? 3. Please identify the agreements, contracts, memoranda of understanding, the applicable Election Procedures Manual (EPM), or other governing documents relating to: Motor Vehicle Division terms and conditions with Elections; United States Postal Service election mail processing; First-level signature verification for the November 3, 2020 General Election; and Any applicable Election Procedures Manual provisions governing these activities. 4. If any of the documents identified in Question 3 do not exist, were not maintained, or cannot be produced, please state that directly. 5. Who is responsible for performing the initial evaluation of a citizen-reported concern that may involve laws, regulations, contracts, policies, procedures, or internal controls? 6. Who determines whether such a concern is a routine administrative matter or a potential compliance issue requiring formal review? 7. Is there an identified process requiring that determination before a concern is routed to one or more County departments? 8. If such a process exists, please identify the policy, procedure, administrative directive, ordinance, or other governing authority establishing that process. 9. When a citizen reports concerns involving governing contracts, the Election Procedures Manual, discrepancies in contract documentation, Disaster Recovery documentation, the inability to locate agreements or memoranda of understanding, or other apparent gaps involving contracts, policies, procedures, regulations, or internal controls, who determines whether those issues warrant formal compliance review? 10. If requested contracts, amendments, agreements, memoranda of understanding, the applicable Election Procedures Manual, or other governing documents cannot be produced, who determines whether that itself constitutes a compliance issue requiring further investigation or corrective action? 11. If a concern is determined to warrant formal compliance review, who is responsible for assigning ownership of the matter? 12. Who is responsible for coordinating any cross-department investigation? 13. Who determines whether corrective action is required? 14. Who verifies that corrective actions have been effectively implemented? 15. Who is responsible for monitoring for recurrence? 16. Who is responsible for formally closing the matter? 17. How is the reporting citizen informed of the outcome of the review? 18. If Maricopa County has a documented process addressing the questions above, I request that the County identify that process. If no such documented process exists, I request that the County state that directly.