Velvet Statik retweeted
Why did the head of the CIA meet with Epstein AFTER he was a convicted sex offender?
You know why.
This is actually crazy to think about now..
🚨STARTING SATURDAY🚨
Join us in Phoenix for the largest event in the movement:
Tucker Carlson
Steve Bannon
Don Jr.
Laura Ingraham
Candace Owens
Tim Pool
Josh Hawley
Kari Lake
Greg Gutfeld
KG
Matt Walsh
Harmeet Dhillon
Kayleigh McEnany
And more...
AMFEST.COM
Their newest grift of “everyone questioning the Charlie Kirk narrative is just a wine-drunk mommy sleuth who wants to free Tyler Robinson” is getting tired. 🥱
Replying to @Michael_McCoyy
There’s a very obvious attempt to lump everyone questioning the Charlie Kirk narrative into the same category as people who believe Lindsay Clancy is innocent, as if both are just examples of internet sleuths becoming emotionally attached to an accused killer.
That fundamentally misrepresents what many of us are saying, and you know that.
We’re not asking anyone to “free Tyler Robinson.” We’re asking whether the entire truth begins and ends with Tyler Robinson.
Those are VERY different positions.
If the evidence proves Tyler participated, hold him accountable. But if others planned, facilitated, assisted, or covered up any part of Charlie’s assassination, I want every single one of them held accountable too.
Questioning whether an accused person acted alone is not the same as declaring them innocent. We have very good reason to believe Tyler didn’t kill Charlie. And we have very good reason to believe that you already know that, Mikey.
Stop collapsing those two things. We see what you’re trying to do, but I assure you.. it won’t work.
This was 2 months before Charlie died.
Replying to @HarrisonHSmith
They would.
If Charlie turned heel on Israel, they would have someone shoot him at an open-air event and they have some idiot groyper with a genetically anomalous issue there to be the patsy/fall-guy.
Part of why you never make the deal with the Devil in the first place.
Velvet Statik retweeted
Golly Brandy!! @BrandyZadrozny
Is this really the quality of propaganda attacks and “Hatchet Jobs” in America these days?
You had better get yourself off to hatchet job finishing school.
That effort would not even get a placement in my loo - if I were Candace. @RealCandaceO
A D- at best. It’s quite embarrassing.
——
As usual, the truth, is where the greatest writing and audiences are to be found and both Charlie and Candace understood and understand that.
That is why they are popular and why their platforms expand.
One point of truth.
And this may help you understand the dynamic of what is occurring, Candace could never be described as Charlie’s “SideKick”.
Charlie and Candace were intellectual equals- at the very least.
Very often he learned from her.
And sometimes he evolved his philosophy from her observations and thoughts. (And she of course his ) This was all part of the dynamic and fun they had together.
In fact when they first came to the UK, it is a fact the the British powers in politics were as a matter of record far more interested in meeting Candace than Charlie.
Her Brand in Dec 2018 was already bigger here and Internationally than Charlie’s. The speed of increase of her Twitter X following shows that too. Charlie at that time was relatively unknown internationally.
As their hosts at the time it was actually slightly embarrassing.
It is fair to say that Candace was the power, at that point, that created a lot of the momentum - with her intellect.
It is she that the media really wanted to speak with when they arrived here in London and it was interesting Candace is the one ( not Charlie ) that was awarded personality of the year in 2018 by one of the top political journalists of the Sunday Times.
I don’t mention this to take away anything from Charlie.
He was very gracious about it at the time. He had recognised Candace and he absolutely loved it when she rose fast and he used all his power to back her up.
And for the purpose of accuracy everyone that they met with us loved them both.
She had her role he had his.
It was like watching a great winning doubles team at Wimbledon Tennis 🎾 tournament. Charlie serving and Candace at the net volleying. Then they would switch it up and Charlie would hit a smash volley- it was intoxicating and highly entertaining and captivating.
Charlie was great with donors and she was the intellectual driver that brought her life and energy to the game.
It was that combination of hard work, intellect, renewed hope and spiritual capacity that donors found irresistible.
So Candace a “sidekick”?
Not on your Nelly.
I realise that is it is extremely hard for non-creative types (who generally have a sort of permanent dull mental solidity) to conceive of the true inception point of the massive creation that was Turning Point.
But creation it was.
Once recognised by Charlie, Candace took the Turning Point Purpose to a whole new level with him.
But you would probably have had to have been there and witnessed this moments personally and to know who provided their energy and power in the moment to fully understand how and why it happened.
I hope this helps.
I’m afraid I don’t know who runs the best Hatchet Job finishing school these days, (so I can’t help with that).
It used to be the British Tabloid Gutter Press.
But to be fair, they have rather lost the plot too.
I think it has something to do with the fact that most of the journalists got three or four COVID jabs.
It seems to have rather lowered the standard of journalism across the boards.
Odd side effect, but there we go.
They could not get enough of them.
Velvet Statik retweeted
Replying to @ChewingTheVoid @ProjectConstitu @IanCarrollShow @Villgecrazylady @NihiloX @realhonestash @realstewpeters @AnaEscobarShow
2 words….Hunter Kozak
Velvet Statik retweeted
Replying to @JohnMappin
Charlie is very much here, and based on your posts, I know you feel him too. They want us not to speak this way because they also know he’s here. They know about his abilities. They know how he was able to predict his own death. Most importantly, they know which side he’s fighting for. Yes, he certainly is communicating from beyond and speaking through so many. Thank you, John.
Velvet Statik retweeted
Replying to @ArtifexMemor
Blake’s full-time job appears to be explaining why you shouldn’t listen to Candace. I thought the evidence was supposed to do that on its own?
If your case is as airtight as you say, you shouldn’t need to spend so much energy convincing everyone not to listen to the person asking questions.
They are scared and desperate.
Velvet Statik retweeted
Replying to @TrueLucas54612 @CinemaShogun
Charlie questioned the Warren Commission’s conclusions about JFK. He questioned the official account of Trump’s attempted assassination. It’s pretty safe to say he would have questions here too.
Asking questions isn’t a personality trait. It’s not fan behavior. It’s skepticism due to the fact that evidence deserves scrutiny…not blind acceptance simply because an authority said so.
Velvet Statik retweeted
Replying to @Rach4Patriarchy
Apparently independent thought no longer exists. If you ask questions, you’re automatically a “Candace fan.”
By that logic, you admit that Charlie was one too.
Hey @grok could an explosion activate iPhone crash detection and make an emergency call?
@Parodyjeffx @RealCandaceO
Velvet Statik retweeted
Replying to @AndrewKolvet
Andrew’s packing list: toothbrush, charger, feminine rage, Erika’s glitter, and Charlie’s “legacy” stuffed in the overhead bin.
Velvet Statik retweeted
Replying to @AndrewKolvet
Judas, you keep presenting stories of Erika being kind to people in her circle as if that disproves every lie or manipulation people have documented.
Bad character isn’t proven by someone being cruel to every person they’ve ever met. Manipulative people can be incredibly kind, generous and loyal to people they value.
“She was good to me” is not evidence that she has been honest with Charlie or the public.
You know the difference.









