The Senate should stay in session continuously until the SAVE America Act is passed. Share if you agree.

Time to nuke the zombie filibuster And pass the SAVE America Act No excuses

Big win for the Constitution today. In Trump v. Slaughter, the Supreme Court correctly overruled *Humphrey’s Executor* and held that the President can remove FTC commissioners at will. The President is the head of the Executive Branch, and unelected bureaucrats with for-cause protections answer to no one. That’s not how our system was designed. Accountability flows through the people to their elected president. Glad to see the Court finally burying this 91-year-old mistake that Chief Justice Roberts described as a precedent “in search of a rationale.” Separation of powers restored.

We make it far too easy for senators in the minority to use the filibuster to kill bills supported by the majority. The whole idea behind the filibuster has, from the beginning, been to protect and prolong debate—not to cut off debate, forcing the Senate to abandon any bill that doesn’t immediately receive the support of at least 60 senators. Filibustering is supposed to require far more than opposing cloture. Especially for bills of exceptional national importance—like the SAVE America Act—senators should be required to hold the floor and speak. The minute filibustering senators stop doing that, the legislation can and should be passed at a simple-majority threshold. This is not a radical idea. This describes what the filibuster is, how it has historically operated, and how it should work today. Share this message if you agree that the Senate—and the country as a whole—would be well served by a return to this approach.

We have two choices: (1) enforce the talking filibuster, or (2) nuke the zombie filibuster. It’s time to pick a horse—and then ride it all the way to victory. The status quo perpetuates election fraud and precludes passage of much-needed reforms like the SAVE America Act.

The federal government makes you work months out of every year Then it uses that money to create horrible things that harm you Then it lies to you about it Time for a constitutional reset Share if you agree

We don’t have 60 votes for the House-passed SAVE America Act But we do have a simple majority Given the bill’s widespread bipartisan popularity, we could pass it with a simple majority—by debating it until it passes I explain how in this clip Share if you want this to happen

Nuking the filibuster is NOT the only option for passing the SAVE America Act There are other ways to break a filibuster that involve neither “nuking” it nor 60 votes They all involve exhausting the obstructing senators—by making them speak We haven’t done that We should—now!

Sometimes the best legislative strategy is the also simplest: (1) Put the SAVE America Act on the Senate floor, (2) Keep debating it until it passes, and (3) Even if that requires the Senate remain on the bill for weeks, eating into weekends and scheduled recesses as necessary

The Senate parliamentarian works for the Senate—not the other way around. She doesn’t rule; she advises. The Senate’s presiding officer is free to accept or reject her advice. And regardless, 51 senators can overturn any procedural ruling in the Senate.

The SAVE America Act is controversial only among Democrats in Congress Everywhere else it’s common sense Senate Republicans should focus on nothing else until it becomes law

Are you tired of Democrats setting the agenda and getting their way even when Republicans control the House, Senate, and White House? Tired of the “we don’t have 60 votes in the Senate” excuse? Me too It’s time to nuke the filibuster Pass it on if you agree

We can talk it out Or we can nuke it One way or another, we’ve got to break the filibuster against the SAVE America Act