My heart absolutely breaks for @KirralieS, who lost her NSW Supreme court appeal to overturn an absurd decision of vilification + a $95,000 fine for bringing attention to men in women’s sport. Women in the league Kirralie was bringing attention to are now speaking out about the men in their women’s league. They don’t want them there. Men who claim to be women are not oppressed or marginalized. They are using ideologically captured institutions to have power over women & punish any who step out of line by saying “no”. $95,000 later, you’ll still be men. Deal with it.

“I have applied to the High Court after the Full Federal Court dismissed the Giggle v Tickle appeal. I am seeking a clear declaration that single-sex spaces for women are lawful and that “woman” remains a biological category in Australian law.” Me on last nights @SkyNewsAust 👇

It is the job of legislators to consider all intended & unintended consequences of amendments. @JuliaGillard’s answer here is an admission that her government did not do their job. Therefore, she remains Australia’s first woman prime minister who destroyed women’s rights, even if she didn’t mean to. It is, however, true that there is no evidence that legislators *did* intend for women’s sex based rights to be destroyed by adding gender identity to the sex discrimination act. That has happened because of ideological activists in the sex discrimination commission, the custodians of the act, who have interpreted the law to the point of removing women from it (but don’t worry, men who claim to be women are covered by law for potential pregnancy…). Also, the judiciary has arguably been legislating from the bench. This is my opinion: I don’t care how or why they did it at this point. I care about fixing it. The fact that *this week* the @AlboMP government has dismissed the issue, blocking both @SenatorCash & @PaulineHansonOz’s bills, will only serve to make him look even more foolish than Julia because he can’t hide behind not knowing the unintended consequences.