TweetHero (@TweetHero1000) header
TweetHero (@TweetHero1000) profile picture

Likes banter, isn't a snowflake! Born and bred in Glasgows East end, supports Celtic FC. Love a good red 🍷 or Buckfast! Now residing further east! 😉

Edinburgh, Scotland
Joined February 2023
Photo by TweetHero (@TweetHero1000)Photo by TweetHero (@TweetHero1000)Photo by TweetHero (@TweetHero1000)Photo by TweetHero (@TweetHero1000)Photo by TweetHero (@TweetHero1000)Photo by TweetHero (@TweetHero1000)Photo by TweetHero (@TweetHero1000)Photo by TweetHero (@TweetHero1000)Photo by TweetHero (@TweetHero1000)Photo by TweetHero (@TweetHero1000)
TweetHero retweeted
Odd how wealthy middle-aged establishment luvvies who promote paedophilia in their work and use their positions in the media to push for the chemical castration of gay boys tend to have partners over three decades younger than them who look like their puberty was stunted at 15...
13
74
3
430
17,226
TweetHero retweeted
This is the future of the UK. If this mouthy cunt is your child you’ve failed badly as a parent. Well done 👏🏼
Kicking off in Edinburgh - The most abusive young people I've ever encountered!
58
108
4
1,103
31,006
TweetHero retweeted
Reminder that the only alleged “rape” he was convicted of occurred in 2009, 17 years ago, and wasn’t reported until 2023. It involved an allegation of non-consensual anal penetration during otherwise consensual sex. There is no physical evidence, only her testimony that it happened, along with testimony from her friends and others close to her that they recalled her saying, or at least implying, that it had happened. The supposed text messages he allegedly sent her afterwards to apologise were never recovered or presented as authenticated digital evidence. That’s interesting, because I’ve seen a lot of people defending Brand’s conviction online point to these messages in particular (even though, even if they did exist, they wouldn’t prove anything given how vague and non descriptive they supposedly were). The bar for being convicted for rape is currently in hell. Unless you are a migrant waiting in a park late at night to ambush a woman, in which case you can cozy up with Brand in a cell for 3 years for what is on paper the same crime as his, and you can count on an early release and some psychiatric care for not knowing any better because of your low IQ.
61
117
8
1,606
61,965
Amen to this!
If you're able to tuck a healthy child into a warm bed with a full belly in a safe home, you've won the lottery of life.
2
37
If a guy has a boner , that does not mean consent … So all you ladies who touched it , sucked it or put it up your nose are all RAPISTS. A boner is not consent being given and you might take this as a joke because we are MEN but MILLIONS of men are suffering in silence from having their erect penis touched without no consent being given whatsoever. We need mass trials for all these RAPISTS. Men can be raped too. Down with the MISANDRISTS ✊🏻
20
15
2
154
3,451
You will never convince me that anyone who waits 15-20 years to come forward with a rape allegation has actually been raped. Women lie all the time, and it's time we stopped pretending otherwise.
I'm not at all comfortable with someone being found guilty of rape 15-20 years after the alleged rape. With waiting so many years to report it, you can never prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, imo. I know I can't be the only one who thinks this.🤔
171
505
18
5,404
39,048
Dear Men , If she woke you up with a blowjob , she RAPED you because she did not ask for consent. Take her to court and get your compensation.
130
140
18
2,160
54,773
Absolute Cinema! Watch To The end. - @FreedomWatchGB, @PeterMcCormack.
1,492
4,549
338
30,146
3,723,119
TweetHero retweeted
So using the Russell Brand case as precedent, any woman can wait 20+ years and then go to police and say the sex she had on a particular night all those years ago wasn't consensual so the guy is then guilty. We're living in the twilight zone.
1,451
2,700
190
26,866
1,238,415
TweetHero retweeted
This is mad, she sucked his dick but objected to him grabbing a tit? The world's upside down.
These are the details of Russell Brand's rape conviction: - Brand met a fan at one of his gigs in 2009 and invited her backstage - She had a consensual threesome with him - "used her tongue on his anus" "within moments" of meeting him - Days later Brand invited her to his house for sex, she agrees - The Times attacks Brand in 2022 for joining Rumble and becoming a right wing "conspiracy theorist" - The Times and Channel 4 colaborate for a big documentary expose in 2023 - Times says it had the allegations since 2019 but waited until his political shift to release them for some reason - Complainants for his criminal case all come forward after the doc drops, some contacted and encouraged by journalists - Jury concludes the woman 17 years ago consented to everything except anal sex, at which point she was raped - Rape charge is bundled with other sexual assault charges, including him grabbing a woman's breasts (which jury concluded was forced) who then gave him oral sex (which jury found was not forced) Brand now faces anything from 8 to 15 years in jail.
168
584
36
13,768
3,621,717
The Russell Brand charges and verdict: GUILTY - Grabbed a woman's breast area at a party. NOT GUILTY - A woman said he tried to "orally rape" her at a bar in Soho. GUILTY - Brand met a woman at a gig music venue, they both went back to his house later, she claimed they had anal sex. She left that evening. She never complained. They never dated. She never texted him anything negative after that. She never filed a police report. She has no DNA evidence. She had no bruises or injuries to show, no photos. She never told any of her close friends she was raped. She waited 16 years to file a police report. GUILTY - 2004 or 2005, the accuser does not remember when, Brand grabbed her sexually at a radio station. She waited 21 years to make a police report. GUILTY - 2009 at a TV station Brand put his head in woman's lap and his nose was "near her vaginal area." She waited 16 years to file a police report.
1,133
1,408
255
9,009
1,728,700
TweetHero retweeted
A conviction based solely on the word of one witness, should never be seen as beyond a reasonable doubt. As, in a situation like that, if the alleged perp was actually guilty it means he committed the perfect crime as there is no corroborating evidence
54
8
1
127
10,263
The Russell Brand verdicts have set a precedent that consent to sexual activity can now be withdrawn long after the fact in the UK It also cements the creep of MSM outlets such as @Channel4 and the @thetimes having become de-facto police forces @FACTukorg
93
158
17
1,153
45,670
TweetHero retweeted
💥 A WARNING FOR ALL FUTURE MEN WHO ARE NOW YOUNG BOYS💥 Don't even AS MUCH sneeze near a woman of today! Or you'll find in litigation! A VERY SAD DAY FOR SOCIETY & our freedoms. Brand remanded in custody and told he faces 'significant custodial term' news.sky.com/story/russell-b…
158
47
21
266
77,824
“If an advert with a mixed race couple bothers you, you’re a racist cunt.” No. It’s the constant, deliberate, everywhere-you-look propaganda that bothers people. White British are still ~74% of England & Wales. Black people are ~4%. Mixed White & Black Caribbean is 0.9%. Mixed White & Black African is 0.4%. White British people in inter-ethnic relationships? Around 4%? Not even that. Yet every other advert, every billboard, every TV show is a mixed couple (usually Black man, White woman) presented as the normal “English” family. It isn’t. It’s a manufactured image. A soft push for race-mixing and the erosion of the historic English population while the actual numbers remain tiny. Representation should match the country, not the ideology of ad agencies and the anti-White class that runs them. Corporate media, ad agencies, the NGOs, the university departments, the civil service, all signed up to the same script. Diversity as the highest good. Whiteness as the original sin. Mixing as moral progress. Continuity of the English people as something to be dismantled quietly, one advert, one curriculum, one policy at a time. They push the opposite image to further their agenda. They push the opposite image because the image is the point. Normalise the replacement. Make the historic population feel like the odd ones out in their own country. Then call anyone who notices a “racist cunt” It isn’t organic. It isn’t “just how Britain looks now.” It’s a managed project with a preferred demographic outcome. The adverts are just the softest, most constant version of it.
If an advert with a mixed race couple in it bothers you, you’re a racist cunt. Hope that helps.
209
669
33
6,380
139,913
Today, David Walliams lost his bid for a permanent anonymity order at the High Court in London. However, a temporary anonymity order remains applicable to those in England & Wales pending appeal. He wished to prevent being named in a media sexual misconduct investigation.
311
1,115
160
7,809
3,141,980
TweetHero retweeted
Marriage is not what they sold you growing up. ​Ask married men. ​ ​Some of them sleep on the couch. In their own house. That they pay for. ​ ​Some go weeks without touch. Not because they stopped wanting it. Because the woman in the next room stopped caring. ​ ​Some don't eat at home. They stop at a restaurant. Eat alone. Then drive back to a house that doesn't feel like one. ​ ​Some haven't had a real conversation with their wife in days. Living together. Sleeping in the same bed. Complete strangers. ​ ​And some sit in their car in their own driveway. Just to get a few more minutes of peace before walking inside. ​ ​They're not single. But they're completely alone. Choose who you marry like your peace depends on it. Because it does.
55
157
6
731
27,459
Evidence that without make up, women like Helen Flanaghan are U. G. L. Y.
Helen Flanagan says she's 'probably going to be arrested' after furious altercation with a traffic warden as she rages: 'Hell hath no fury if you get my wrath!'
24
India is a shithole, which I suppose must be the inspiration for @theSNP turning Scotland into one.
In a fast-moving world, Scotland cannot afford to stand still. I make no apology for building relationships, attracting more investment and creating more opportunities. That's exactly what my visit to India was about. My reflections in @TheScotsman: scotsman.com/news/opinion/jo…
5