Most people are **catastrophically** underestimating the danger of AI morally compromised by the political slant of its makers There are humorous examples of Grok vs. {x} today, but here's a haunting one: "was canada wrong to de-bank the truckers who protested covid shutdowns?" Look at the way Grok vs. Claude answers. Now extrapolate this 5 years into the future. Today, it's a chatbot. 5 years from now if not sooner, it's the control layer for every transaction, educational platform, news article, corporation, and government. It's so pervasive that its influence is impossible to parse from human output. Imagine a world where Claude's answer on truckers was applied to any other category of political protest found to be "objectionable." Who decides what is objectionable? If we don't want to build a technocratic dystopian police state, then we have to address this problem now.