It can be strange, in a way, that the book of Hebrews connects Christ's coming with a prophecy about Babylon.
For yet in a very little while,
He who is coming will come, and will not delay.
But My righteous one shall live by faith
— Hebrews 10:37-38
Habakkuk contains a vision of the impending invasion of Judah by the Babylonians around the early 6th century BC.
The author of Hebrews is speaking of Christ's second coming.
Is it strange to compare Christ's coming to that of a former enemy army?
Do distant stars have generations?
These are the generations of the heavens and the earth when they were created, in the day that Yahweh God made earth and heaven.
— Genesis 2:4
Physical planet and stars?
To Pharaoh:
And when I extinguish you,
I will cover the heavens and darken their stars;
I will cover the sun with a cloud,
And the moon will not give its light.
All the shining lights in the heavens
I will darken over you
— Ezekiel 32:7-8
What does it mean for God's Law/Torah to be placed upon His people's hearts and minds in the New Covenant?
I will put My laws upon their heart,
And on their mind I will write them
— Hebrews 10:16
Is the Bible about two stories or one story?
Both the physical universe and the covenant order? Or just covenant?
Well, does it describe a beginning and end for both? We should be consistent.
Which covenant? The old covenant before Sinai.
So God heard their groaning; and God remembered His covenant with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. And God saw the sons of Israel, and God knew them.
— Exodus 2:24-25
The old covenant people are called sons of Adam, sons of Abraham, and Israel (Jacob), yet some say the old covenant started at Sinai?
Great quote:
"We must make every attempt to set our English categories aside, to leave our cultural ideas behind, and try our best (as limited as the attempt might be) to understand the material in its cultural context without translating it." -John Walton
Replying to @KingOfSalt4
'It is far too easy to let our own ideas creep in and subtly (or at times not so subtly) bend or twist the material (Scripture) to fit our own context.
On the level of words, for example, there are Hebrew words that simply do not have matching words in English.
(...)
When we move to the level of culture, the same type of problem occurs. The very act of trying to translate the culture requires taking it out of its context and fitting it into ours. What does the text mean when it describes Sarah as “beautiful”? One not only has to know the meaning of the word, but also must have some idea of what defines beauty in the ancient world. When the Bible speaks of something as elemental as marriage, we are not wrong to think of it as the establishment of a socially and legally recognized relationship between a man and a woman. But marriage carries a lot more social nuance than that in our culture and not necessarily similar at all to the social nuances in the ancient culture. When marriages are arranged and represent alliances between families and exchange of wealth, the institution fills a far different place in the culture than what we know when feelings of love predominate. In that light the word marriage means something vastly different in ancient culture, even though the word is translated properly. We would seriously distort the text and interpret it incorrectly if we imposed all of the aspects of marriage in our culture into the text and culture of the Bible. The minute anyone (professional or amateur) attempts to translate the culture, we run the risk of making the text communicate something it never intended.
Rather than translating the culture, then, we need to try to enter the culture.
(...)
We must make every attempt to set our English categories aside, to leave our cultural ideas behind, and try our best (as limited as the attempt might be) to understand the material in its cultural context without translating it.'
“The Hebrew term raquia consistently refers to a physical surface that has been stretched out, like fabric stretched over a frame or like “hammered out gold leaf” (Ex 39:3; cf. Num 16:38). The Genesis text says God “made” or “fashioned” (asah) the raquia in the heavens, indicating that something material was “stretched out” by him (Ps 104:2). Paul Seely explains,
Standard Hebrew lexica… have defined the raquia (firmament) of Gen 1:6-8 as a solid dome over the earth… Only by taking Genesis 1 out of its historical context could one say that raquia means merely ‘an atmospheric expanse’ or, as more sophisticated conservatives say, “just phenomenal language.” In the ancient world the sky was not just phenomenal. The ancients did not just refer to the appearance of the sky as being solid. They concluded from the appearance that the sky really was solid… the raquia was for them literal physical part of the universe, just as solid as the earth itself.
Some scholars have tried to show that raquia, at least as used in the creation account, does not refer to a physical dome. However, within the Bible itself there is confirmation the day two raquia should be read as a physical vault. Psalm 104:2 reflects on creation day two with the words, “stretch[ed] out the heavens like a tent.” And the author of Job, reflecting on creation day two, wrote, “Can you, like him, spread out [raquia] the skies, hard as a cast metal mirror?” (Job 37:18). This perception is pervasive in the Bible. Exodus describes an encounter with God on Mount Sinai as a climb high enough to reach the dome of heaven and see through it to the feet of God: “There was under [God’s] feet as it were a pavement of sapphire stone, like the very heaven for clearness” (Ex 24:10). In that instance, God revealed “his feet” within the cultural expectations that his throne rested on the dome one the earth. Ezekiel saw a similar vision of God’s throne on top of a crystalline dome:
Over the heads of the living creatures there was the likeness of an expanse [raquia], shining like awe-inspiring crystal, spread out above their heads. And under the expanse [raquia] their wings were stretched out… And there came a voice from above the expanse [raqia] over their heads… And above the expanse [raquia] over their heads there was the likeness of a throne, in appearance like sapphire; and seated above the likeness of a throne was… the likeness of the glory of the LORD. (Ezek 1:22-28; cf. Ezek 10:1; Ps 104:1-3, 13)
The day two narrative envisions a physical vault fashioned by God, inserted into the midst of the waters, and then elevated to heft half of hotel waters into a suspended position over the earth. The description is like a knife slicing into a dinner roll, and then lifting the upper half of the roll from over the lower half. The firmament installed on day two is the backdrop for events on other creation days also. The heavenly lights were thought to be suspended from the heavenly dome, traveling their courses across its surface. Thus on day four God states, “Let there be lights in the firmament [raquia] of the heavens” (Gen 1:14), and on day five the birds were said to fly “across the face of the firmament of the heavens” (Gen 1:20).
Modern scientific tools have enabled humans to examine the skies — and even to visit them! We now know that there is no physical vault in the heavens. If, therefore, we were to judge the accuracy of the Bible by the degree to which the Spirit gave the prophets advanced scientific insight, then Gen 1:6-8 needs to be added to a long list of problem texts. But here, as throughout the Bible, the Scripture reveals heaven’s truths within the language and conventions of the original audience.”
Michael Lefebvre, The Liturgy of Creation (2019), pp. 154-155.
H/T Tim Martin
Tsynod retweeted
Jesus on Jerusalem: there will not be one stone upon another that will not be torn down (Matt 24).
Jeremiah on Babylon: "No stone shall be taken from you for a corner and no stone for a foundation, but you shall be a perpetual waste" (Jer 51).
Jesus describes the fall of Jerusalem as the fall of another Babylon, just like Revelation 17-18.
We see de-creation language of the "heavens and earth" in Jeremiah 4:23, and it relates to the covenant people of God.
Where do we see the beginning of and original creation of "heavens and earth" as it relates to the covenant people of God?
Tsynod retweeted
Replying to @RaymondessW @jasonstaples
Basic dynamic: Scattered among Gentiles, Israel becomes gentilized. When God gathers all Israel back to Himself, the Gentiles are included among the gentilized nations. Thus Gentiles become Israelized.
Warning to those in the old covenant.
Moth and rust.
Do not store up for yourselves treasures on earth, where moth and rust destroy, and where thieves break in and steal. But store up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust destroys
— Matthew 6:19-20






