Daniel G. retweeted
Angie Nixon: "They're spreading lies about me saying I want to abolish prisons... Why would I want to do that when I want [Ashley Moody] locked up and jailed."
CNN: "You want your Republican opponent locked up?"
Angie Nixon: "Yeah basically. I absolutely want that to happen."
Daniel G. retweeted
Dawn Staley asked if she tweaks anything going into this season after back-to-back national title losses compared to what she normally does:
"I think mentally is where we need to be stronger. Obviously, I think there's been breakdown in our mental strength."
@GamecockWBB
Daniel G. retweeted
There's a reason why some scientists don't want people to think sex is binary, and it has nothing to do with science and everything to do with activism. The sex binary is one of the most basic and recognizable facets of human life. Anyone who pretends otherwise has an agenda.
Daniel G. retweeted
Nobody has said the men behaved morally. Not one person.
In fact, every conservative I know who has talked about the case has said everyone involved is disgusting and that the men involved should be ashamed. As should Jane Ho, who clearly had consented to all of it. They’re all filthy and they all need Jesus (as do you).
You’re also correct that you haven’t assimilated, but that’s a separate topic for another time.
Daniel G. retweeted
Honestly, this will be an even worse railroading than Derek Chauvin. There will be huge Handmaiden’s Tale protests outside the courthouse. The jury will be majority-woman, and they’ll all be Tik Tok-watching maniacs. These boys will have a better chance of justice on Mars.
Reporter: "Attorney General, on your Facebook page three days ago, you wrote, ‘What this young woman has been forced to endure is horrific and unacceptable. I'm holding her in my heart and in my prayers. To her and to all survivors, you're not alone. We stand with you.’ Why did you affirm her allegations as fact without doing your own fact-finding investigation? And to the governor, why did you appoint an official who made a public statement affirming those allegations as fact as someone who's supposed to be doing an investigation?”
New York Governor Kathy Hochul (D): “I will answer that. I have every confidence in our Attorney General to do what she has always done. Look at the facts, examine the record, and draw the proper conclusions. That's exactly what's going to happen in this case. Attorney General, please.”
New York Attorney General Letitia James: “I will not comment on a Facebook post.”
Great question!
Daniel G. retweeted
This case is becoming such a political circus.
How do you appoint someone as a special prosecutor who has already publicly taken a position on the case prior to examining most of the relevant facts?
Daniel G. retweeted
One of the most pernicious lies the media has propagated is that journalists possess some special freedom of speech unavailable to everyone else. They do not. The First Amendment does not create a privileged caste called “the media.” Freedom of speech belongs to everyone, equally.
And “freedom of the press” does not mean special constitutional privileges for people carrying press credentials. The press is the means of publication and dissemination, historically the printing press. That freedom belongs to everyone too, because freedom of speech is worthless if you are forbidden from publishing or disseminating what you say.
This is elementary constitutional law. Yet media figures, including increasingly toxic voices at Fox News, continue pretending that calling yourself a journalist somehow entitles you to rights the rest of the country does not have. It doesn’t. That lie should be called out every single time it is repeated.
Today’s action revoking access for journalists from CNN, POLITICO, and MSNOW violates the First Amendment. The implications extend beyond these organizations: a standard used to exclude one news outlet because of its coverage could be applied to any outlet in the future. The American people, through a free and independent press, must be able to scrutinize those elected to power, regardless of whether government officials view it favorably. That’s why courts have repeatedly held that once the White House provides access to journalists, it cannot deny that access arbitrarily or based on the content of their reporting. The WHCA calls on the administration to immediately restore our colleagues' access.
- Jacqui Heinrich, WHCA President
Daniel G. retweeted
"The status of the Epstein investigation? Is that your question?"
"Yes, what is the status of the Epstein investigation?"
"Epstein is dead. His co-conspirator Maxwell is serving a 20 year sentence."
That is the status of the Epstein investigation.
Daniel G. retweeted
The Community Note here is as misleading as the people insisting that, in the end, the miscarriage problem turned out not to be that serious.
Leaving aside whether first trimester miscarriage can even be measured with the precision people now pretend, that was never the point. Fauci, Murthy, and Walensky were privately discussing specific risk indicators, including significant cytokine storm, fever, and concerns that mRNA might cause mutations in a developing fetus.
Days later, Fauci went on television and told the public there was no risk.
So it does not matter how all of this ultimately turned out. They identified specific risks in private, and Fauci then told the public there was no risk. Whatever the final numbers showed does not make that any less evil.
This quoted post is unavailable.
Daniel G. retweeted
Imagine risking your life just to display a flag with a cornball millennial cringe quote.
BREAKING: Two people have climbed to the top of the Empire State Building in New York City, holding a banner from the skyscraper's antenna reading, "When the power of love beats the love of power, the world knows peace."
As of now it's unclear how the pair reached the top of the building as police work to get them down from the spire, 1,454 feet above the ground.
Daniel G. retweeted
The entire leadership of the Govt and IRGC have been eliminated.
It has no Air Force or Navy.
It's only two means of striking out are indiscriminate missile attacks against its neighbors and holding shipping hostage in the Strait.
The world will not tolerate either one -- the focus will now be to make both of those insignificant.
The country is entirely open to penetration by outside intelligence services.
Iran's new enemies throughout the Gulf will now actively work with the US and Israel on how to finish the job on their own time frame.
When China has a new regular supply of oil, it won't have any further need to protect the Mullahs.
Daniel G. retweeted
The Judgment Fund isn’t a Trump invention. Congress created it in 1956. No judge sign-off required.
Obama’s DOJ used it for “discrimination” farm payouts and steered leftovers to nonprofits that filed zero claims.
DOJ paid Strzok and Page $2M from it too.
Funny how it only became a scandal once Trump tapped it.
Daniel G. retweeted
Replying to @shipwreckedcrew
There is no way dozens of top lawyers representing hundreds of plaintiffs would have refrained for so many years from suing multiple rich Epstein “clients”, if such existed. To entertain this ridiculous theory is an insult to attorneys. 😉
Daniel G. retweeted
There is no “list”. There has never been a list. The “collection of names” came up in the Maxwell trial. There is an exhibit under seal and Maxwell explain what it was in the interview with Blanche.
This has always been an invention of the plaintiffs’ lawyers in FL who have made millions keeping this fraud/grift alive via social media.
Daniel G. retweeted
The whole point is that there's nothing to blow open. The last time that Massie read names on the House floor, he defamed four random civilians who had nothing to do with Epstein other than being in a random police lineup with him.
Massie was a fraud, a faker, and now he's done
I’m begging @RepThomasMassie to go on the House floor asap & read all of the names in the #EpsteinFiles - you were a hero for survivors - you believed them & fought for them. Your actions were brave & heroic. Now pls blow the whole thing wide open. Thank you.
Daniel G. retweeted
Massie tweeted about Epstein a whopping three (3) times before 2025, which is three times more than the zero (0) times Ro Khanna mentioned Epstein before Trump took office in 2025.
The sanctimony is a bit much given that their only interest in Epstein is using him to clout chase online.
My good friend @RepThomasMassie lost tonight.
He lost because he had the guts to stand up to the Epstein class and against the war.
He won voters under 45 by 30 points.
Tonight, I say to this voters who feel rejected by Trump. We welcome you. Join our coalition to take on a rotten system and stand for the working class over the Epstein class.
We will build a movement to stand for Team America.
































