Lab testing per US FDA requirements for consumer injectables • Accuracy Matters. Results You Can Trust. • FDA #3034276914 • Women-Owned Small Business
Dorr, MI
Joined November 2024
- Tweets558
- Following91
- Followers1K
- Likes256
Pinned Tweet
Today a client told us:
“I use TrustPointe because I know if it passed your testing, my product would pass any other lab it was sent to.”
We talk about method validation and forced degradation, but that’s probably the simplest description of our value (and a high compliment).
A clean COA doesn't tell you if a peptide manufacturer can hit spec batch after batch.
Quality+ does: on-site cGMP audit + 30 vials pulled from the line and tested in our lab.
Vet your supplier before you commit.
trustpointeanalytics.com/pag…
I figured out social media cards. Thanks for the help @pepfessions 🙏
So pretty 🤩
TrustPointeAnalytics.com?v=2
Got our first testing order with NFCs. Researchers will be able to tap the vial with their phone to pull up the COA on our website.
Will be cool to see this come to life 🤩
Updated the python script for USP <905> Content Uniformity to include the Assay values and make the results human-readable
TrustPointe is now on @peptigrity
peptigrity.com/testing-labs/…
TrustPointe Analytics 🥼 retweeted
This is exactly where the industry needs to go. Tested batch linked to the actual vial in your hand. No more taking a vendor's word for it.
Introducing TrustPointe Quality+
Before you commit to a long-term peptide supplier, find out if they can actually hold spec.
We send an auditor on-site during production, pull 30 vials off the line, and test them in our lab with fully validated methods.
You get an FDA cGMP-based audit, ranked risks, and real capability data. Not just a COA.
Details: trustpointeanalytics.com/pag…
Something I found interesting about the Lilly lawsuits: they never present objective evidence of their safety claims.
They clearly have the resources to test grey market samples.
Like “marketed as reta but isn’t reta based on MS”.
TrustPointe Analytics 🥼 retweeted
Hot take:
People seeing the cost per vial from China are “outraged” by reseller pricing.
What they don’t see:
Spending all hours of the night on Whatsapp trying to find a legitimate supplier.
Hours of negotiation to arrive at pricing and a proforma invoice.
Taking a risk and wiring $20k overseas, knowing you may never see product.
If they ship it, there’s a 10% chance CBP deletes it at the border, and you have no recourse with the supplier.
If you do get it, you have to find a lab that tests it - and some are 2-3 weeks out. There’s a 20-30% chance it’s garbage. You are out the test money and the supplier will argue the results (or ghost you).
Then you sell it, and your processor fines you $50k for selling them. And people scam you by saying they never got the order.
It’s easy to see two numbers and not see all of the risk and losses between the two.
Prices will come down due to competition, but people are entitled to earn money for the risk and effort they put in.
TrustPointe Analytics 🥼 retweeted
We are very conservative on purity.
Unless we know what an atypical peak is, it is integrated and included in the purity value, causing it to be lower.
We have worked with willing manufacturers to inject multiple excipients on our methods to see if they align with the atypical peak - at which point we would be comfortable labeling that peak as an excipient and not including it in the purity calculation.
We’re working on something that might change how vendors in this space are viewed
More details on Tuesday
Vox populi, vox dei
Use code TPX1000 for 30% off all peptide testing, all week 👨🔬🥼🧪
trustpointeanalytics.com/
And there it is! Thank you @Xil3nt1
What are we doing for 1000 followers fam?
