Study This...

Do I have: A clear process / routine which encapsulates the following: => Mindset & Psychological Framework => Risk Management Framework => Position Sizing Framework / Kelly Criterion => Clearly Defined Strategies => Knowing My Expectancy Behind Each Strategy => Having a Large Enough Sample Size Per Strategy => Can I Then Scale Up Those Strategies - I cant scale up randomness => Effectively Review Trades => Effectively Journal Trades & Track Performance / Metric - This is what I enjoy the most - and fine tune edge. If I were to start over or adopt a new trading strategy, I would begin by sizing down and placing full emphasis on both qualitative and quantitative journaling of my performance. We all have a tendency to throw capital at something we dont fully understand, this isnt trading an edge, its trading randomness. The goal would be to deeply understand the process and confirm that I have a positive expectancy, an edge over a good enough sample size, forward tested. Only once that edge is clear and proven would I consider scaling up with confidence and control, executing and managing risk while playing the probabilities, until that edge eventually fades or erodes and if not then is it a mindset issue. That above is the structure I wish I had when I was figuring out the game.